# Specification Quality Checklist: RBAC Troubleshooting & Tenant UI Bugfix Pack v1

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-01-31
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details beyond constitution-required constraints (RBAC semantics, canonical capability registry references)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders (with minimal, clearly-scoped technical constraints where required)
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification (outside the minimal, constitution-required constraints)

## Notes

- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`

- Open issues identified by consistency analysis:
	- Diagnostics + duplicates repair lacks explicit test coverage (spec FR-006).
	- Repair actions require explicit audit trail tasks/tests (spec FR-008).
	- SC-001 relies on an undefined “standard click paths” set.
	- Spec/plan include some implementation-detail language that should be reduced.

- Status:
	- Duplicate membership coverage is addressed by tasks T019 and T023.
	- Repair audit trail coverage is addressed by tasks T020 and T023.
	- SC-001 was reworded to remove the undefined 95% threshold.
	- Plan template placeholders were removed.
