spec: add 049 backup/restore job orchestration
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d4607c037
commit
99eb45cbd5
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Specification Quality Checklist: Backup/Restore Job Orchestration (049)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
||||||
|
**Created**: 2026-01-11
|
||||||
|
**Feature**: [specs/049-backup-restore-job-orchestration/spec.md](../spec.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Content Quality
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
||||||
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
||||||
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
||||||
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
||||||
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
||||||
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
||||||
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
||||||
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
||||||
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
||||||
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
||||||
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Feature Readiness
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
||||||
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
||||||
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
||||||
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Constitution alignment text references Microsoft Graph; this is a process requirement and not an implementation constraint.
|
||||||
148
specs/049-backup-restore-job-orchestration/spec.md
Normal file
148
specs/049-backup-restore-job-orchestration/spec.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Feature Specification: Backup/Restore Job Orchestration (049)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Feature Branch**: `feat/049-backup-restore-job-orchestration`
|
||||||
|
**Created**: 2026-01-11
|
||||||
|
**Status**: Draft
|
||||||
|
**Input**: Ensure Backup/Restore “start/execute” actions never run inline in an interactive request; they run via background processing with run records and visible progress.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Purpose
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
All Backup/Restore “Start/Execute” actions run exclusively via background processing with Run Records and visible progress. This prevents timeouts, double-click duplication, throttling issues, and improves reliability at MSP scale.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Non-Goals (Phase 1)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- No new directory/group inventory or name resolution features (separate initiative)
|
||||||
|
- No changes to external service contracts unless required for orchestration safety
|
||||||
|
- No new promotion feature (e.g., DEV→PROD) (separate initiative)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### User Story 1 - Capture snapshot runs in background (Priority: P1)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An admin can start a “capture snapshot” operation without the UI hanging or timing out, and can see progress plus the final result.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why this priority**: Snapshot capture is a core workflow and a common source of long-running requests.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Independent Test**: Starting a snapshot capture immediately returns to the UI with a queued Run Record that later transitions to a terminal state (success/failed/partial) and can be inspected.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Given** an admin has access to a tenant, **When** they start “capture snapshot”, **Then** the UI confirms it was queued and shows a link to the Run Record.
|
||||||
|
2. **Given** a capture snapshot run is executing, **When** the admin views the run, **Then** they see progress (items done vs total) and any safe error summaries.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### User Story 2 - Restore runs in background with per-item results (Priority: P1)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An admin can start a “restore to Intune” or “re-run restore” operation as a background run and later inspect item-level outcomes and errors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why this priority**: Restore is high-impact and must be resilient, observable, and safe under retries.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Independent Test**: Starting restore creates a Run Record and item results that remain accessible even if the external service is unavailable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Given** an admin starts a restore, **When** they confirm the action, **Then** the UI queues a run and returns immediately (no long-running request).
|
||||||
|
2. **Given** a restore run finishes with mixed outcomes, **When** the admin views the run details, **Then** they see succeeded/failed counts and a safe error summary per failed item.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### User Story 3 - Backup set create/capture runs in background (Priority: P2)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An admin can create a backup set and optionally start a capture/sync operation without the request doing heavy work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why this priority**: Creating backup sets is frequent and should not be coupled to long-running capture logic.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Independent Test**: Creating a backup set returns quickly and any capture/sync work appears as a run with progress.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Given** an admin creates a backup set with capture enabled, **When** they submit, **Then** the backup set is created and a capture run is queued.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### User Story 4 - Dry-run/preview runs in background (Priority: P2)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An admin can run a dry-run/preview without UI timeouts, and the preview results are persisted and shown in the UI.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why this priority**: Preview supports safe change management and must remain usable even when the external service is slow or down.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Independent Test**: Starting preview immediately creates a run; once finished, preview outputs are visible and reusable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Given** an admin starts a preview run, **When** the run completes, **Then** the UI shows preview results without requiring re-execution.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Edge Cases
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Double-clicking an action rapidly
|
||||||
|
- Retrying while an identical run is already queued or running
|
||||||
|
- External service is unavailable (e.g., throttling or outage)
|
||||||
|
- A run gets stuck or exceeds expected duration
|
||||||
|
- Permissions change after a run was queued
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Constitution alignment (required):** If this feature introduces any Microsoft Graph calls or any write/change behavior,
|
||||||
|
the spec MUST describe contract registry updates, safety gates (preview/confirmation/audit), tenant isolation, and tests.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Functional Requirements
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-001 Job-only execution**: The system MUST execute the following operations via background processing and MUST NOT perform heavy work inline during the interactive request:
|
||||||
|
- Capture snapshot
|
||||||
|
- Backup set create with capture/sync (when capture is triggered)
|
||||||
|
- Restore to Intune
|
||||||
|
- Re-run restore
|
||||||
|
- Restore dry-run/preview
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-002 Run Records**: Each operation start MUST create (or deterministically re-use) a Run Record before the work begins, containing:
|
||||||
|
- Tenant identity
|
||||||
|
- Initiator identity (user reference or audit reference)
|
||||||
|
- Operation type and optional target object reference
|
||||||
|
- Status lifecycle: queued → running → (succeeded | failed | partial | canceled)
|
||||||
|
- Started/finished timestamps
|
||||||
|
- Item counts: total / succeeded / failed
|
||||||
|
- Safe error code and safe error context (no secrets)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-003 Progress visibility**: While a run is executing, the system MUST provide visible progress in the admin UI and MUST emit in-app notifications for key state transitions (queued/running/completed/failed).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-004 Idempotency & concurrency control**: The system MUST prevent uncontrolled duplicate execution due to double-clicks/retries by enforcing a deterministic de-duplication rule keyed by (tenant + operation type + target object) or (tenant + run id). When an identical run is already queued/running, the UI MUST show “already queued/running” and link to the existing run.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-005 Deterministic outcome persistence**: The system MUST persist per-item outcomes for operations that act on multiple items, including status and a safe error summary, so results can be viewed later without relying on logs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-006 Tenant isolation & authorization**: Run visibility and execution MUST be tenant-scoped. Only authorized admins can start operations, and users MUST NOT be able to view or start runs across tenants.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-007 Safety rules**: Preview/dry-run MUST be safe (no writes). Live restore MUST remain guarded with explicit confirmation and an auditable trail consistent with existing safety practices.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-008 Resilience**: The system MUST handle external service throttling/outages gracefully, including retries with backoff when appropriate, and MUST end runs in a clear terminal state (failed/partial) rather than silently failing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-009 Safe logging & data minimization**: The system MUST NOT store secrets/tokens in Run Records, notifications, or error contexts. Error context MUST be limited to a defined, safe set of fields.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Acceptance Checks
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Starting any in-scope operation returns quickly with a queued Run Record link.
|
||||||
|
- A Run Record always exists before background work begins and reaches a terminal state.
|
||||||
|
- Progress and state changes are visible in the UI via progress display and in-app notifications.
|
||||||
|
- Duplicate start attempts for the same tenant + operation + target do not create uncontrolled duplicate execution.
|
||||||
|
- Item-level outcomes and safe error summaries are viewable after completion.
|
||||||
|
- Preview/dry-run never performs writes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Run Record**: A tenant-scoped record representing one started operation and its lifecycle, progress, and summary outcome.
|
||||||
|
- **Run Item Result**: A tenant-scoped record representing the outcome for a single item processed as part of a Run Record.
|
||||||
|
- **Notification Event**: A tenant-scoped event surfaced to the admin UI to communicate run state changes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Measurable Outcomes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **SC-001**: For 95% of operation starts, the UI confirms “queued” within 2 seconds.
|
||||||
|
- **SC-002**: Double-clicking an operation start results in at most one queued/running run for the same tenant + operation + target.
|
||||||
|
- **SC-003**: 99% of runs end in a clear terminal state (succeeded/failed/partial/canceled) with a human-readable summary.
|
||||||
|
- **SC-004**: Admins can locate the latest run status for an operation in under 30 seconds without requiring access to system logs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Assumptions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- This feature builds on the UI safety constraints from 048: admin pages must remain usable even when the external service API is unavailable.
|
||||||
|
- Run Records and item results are retained long enough to support operational troubleshooting and audits, with retention managed as a separate policy.
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user