## Summary
- add a shared cross-resource navigation layer with canonical navigation context and related-context rendering
- wire findings, policy versions, baseline snapshots, backup sets, and canonical operations surfaces into consistent drill-down flows
- extend focused Pest coverage for canonical operations links, related navigation, and tenant-context preservation
## Testing
- focused Pest coverage for spec 131 was added and the task list marks the implementation verification and Pint steps as completed
## Follow-up
- manual QA checklist item `T036` in `specs/131-cross-resource-navigation/tasks.md` is still open and should be completed during review
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #160
## Summary
- replace the baseline snapshot detail page with a structured summary-first rendering flow
- add a presenter plus renderer registry with RBAC, compliance, and fallback renderers
- add grouped policy-type browsing, fidelity and gap badges, and workspace authorization coverage
- add Feature 130 spec, plan, contract, research, quickstart, and completed task artifacts
## Testing
- focused Pest coverage was added for structured rendering, fallback behavior, degraded states, authorization, presenter logic, renderer resolution, and badge mapping
- I did not rerun the full validation suite in this final PR step
## Notes
- base branch: `dev`
- feature branch: `130-structured-snapshot-rendering`
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #158
Kontext / Ziel
Diese PR standardisiert Tenant‑RBAC Enforcement in der Filament‑UI: statt ad-hoc Gate::*, abort_if/abort_unless und kopierten ->visible()/->disabled()‑Closures gibt es jetzt eine zentrale, wiederverwendbare Implementierung für Actions (Header/Table/Bulk).
Links zur Spec:
spec.md
plan.md
quickstart.md
Was ist drin
Neue zentrale Helper-API: UiEnforcement (Tenant-plane RBAC‑UX “source of truth” für Filament Actions)
Standardisierte Tooltip-Texte und Context-DTO (UiTooltips, TenantAccessContext)
Migration vieler tenant‑scoped Filament Action-Surfaces auf das Standardpattern (ohne ad-hoc Auth-Patterns)
CI‑Guard (Test) gegen neue ad-hoc Patterns in app/Filament/**:
verbietet Gate::allows/denies/check/authorize, use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Gate, abort_if/abort_unless
Legacy-Allowlist ist aktuell leer (neue Verstöße failen sofort)
RBAC-UX Semantik (konsequent & testbar)
Non-member: UI Actions hidden (kein Tenant‑Leak); Execution wird blockiert (Filament hidden→disabled chain), Defense‑in‑depth enthält zusätzlich serverseitige Guards.
Member ohne Capability: Action visible aber disabled + Standard-Tooltip; Execution wird blockiert (keine Side Effects).
Member mit Capability: Action enabled und ausführbar.
Destructive actions: über ->destructive() immer mit ->requiresConfirmation() + klare Warntexte (Execution bleibt über ->action(...)).
Wichtig: In Filament v5 sind hidden/disabled Actions typischerweise “silently blocked” (200, keine Ausführung). Die Tests prüfen daher UI‑State + “no side effects”, nicht nur HTTP‑Statuscodes.
Sicherheit / Scope
Keine neuen DB-Tabellen, keine Migrations, keine Microsoft Graph Calls (DB‑only bei Render; kein outbound HTTP).
Tenant Isolation bleibt Isolation‑Boundary (deny-as-not-found auf Tenant‑Ebene, Capability erst nach Membership).
Kein Asset-Setup erforderlich; keine neuen Filament Assets.
Compliance Notes (Repo-Regeln)
Filament v5 / Livewire v4.0+ kompatibel.
Keine Änderungen an Provider‑Registrierung (Laravel 11+/12: providers.php bleibt der Ort; hier unverändert).
Global Search: keine gezielte Änderung am Global‑Search-Verhalten in dieser PR.
Tests / Qualität
Pest Feature/Unit Tests für Member/Non-member/Tooltip/Destructive/Regression‑Guard.
Guard-Test: “No ad-hoc Filament auth patterns”.
Full suite laut Tasks: vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact → 837 passed, 5 skipped.
Checklist: requirements.md vollständig (16/16).
Review-Fokus
API‑Usage in neuen/angepassten Filament Actions: UiEnforcement::forAction/forTableAction/forBulkAction(...)->requireCapability(...)->apply()
Guard-Test soll “red” werden, sobald jemand neue ad-hoc Auth‑Patterns einführt (by design).
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@MacBookPro.fritz.box>
Reviewed-on: #81
