## Summary
- normalize provider-neutral target-scope and identity contracts across provider connection resolution, operation-start gating, verification reporting, and boundary configuration
- align provider connection resource, onboarding, tenant summaries, and operation follow-up on the same shared scope contract while keeping Microsoft-specific profile details in provider-owned metadata
- add Spec 281 artifacts and focused feature/browser coverage for the new provider-scope contract
- move the tenant dashboard context-chip rail into Filament header widgets so the metadata row renders directly under the page subtitle
## Validation
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Providers/ProviderConnectionTargetScopeNeutralityTest.php tests/Feature/Providers/ProviderIdentityResolutionNeutralityTest.php tests/Feature/Providers/ProviderOperationStartGateTargetScopeContextTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/ProviderConnectionResourceScopeSummaryTest.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/ManagedTenantOnboardingProviderConnectionScopeTest.php tests/Feature/Guards/ProviderConnectionMicrosoftScopeLeakGuardTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Browser/Spec281ProviderConnectionScopeSmokeTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Dashboard/TenantDashboardProductizationSummaryTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Browser/Dashboard/TenantDashboardProductizationSmokeTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
## Notes
- Filament remains on v5 with Livewire v4-compatible surfaces only.
- Provider registration location is unchanged; Laravel 11+ providers stay in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php`.
- `ProviderConnectionResource` remains non-globally-searchable and still exposes View/Edit pages.
- No new asset registration was added; deploy-time `filament:assets` expectations are unchanged.
- No new destructive action path was introduced; existing server authorization and confirmation handling remain in place where applicable.
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #339
## Summary
- replace the legacy Tenant and TenantMembership core models with ManagedEnvironment and ManagedEnvironmentMembership
- propagate the managed environment naming and key changes across Filament resources, pages, controllers, jobs, models, and supporting runtime paths
- add feature 279 spec artifacts and focused managed-environment test coverage for model behavior, route binding, panel context, authorization, and legacy guardrails
## Validation
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/ManagedEnvironment/LegacyTenantCoreGuardTest.php tests/Feature/ManagedEnvironment/ManagedEnvironmentAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/ManagedEnvironment/ManagedEnvironmentPanelContextTest.php tests/Feature/ManagedEnvironment/ManagedEnvironmentRouteBindingTest.php tests/Unit/ManagedEnvironment/ManagedEnvironmentContextResolverTest.php tests/Unit/ManagedEnvironment/ManagedEnvironmentModelTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
## Notes
- branch pushed from commit `1123b122`
- browser smoke test file was added but not run in this pass
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #335
## Summary
- add a shared provider target-scope descriptor, normalizer, identity-context metadata, and surface-summary layer
- update provider connection list, detail, create, edit, and onboarding surfaces to use neutral target-scope vocabulary while keeping Microsoft identity contextual
- align provider connection audit and resolver output with the neutral target-scope contract and add focused guard/unit/feature coverage for regressions
## Validation
- browser smoke: opened the tenant-scoped provider connection list, drilled into detail, and verified the edit/create surfaces in local admin context
## Notes
- this PR comes from the session branch created for the active feature work
- no additional runtime or persistence layer was introduced in this slice
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #274
