feat: verification report framework (074) (#89)

Implements the 074 verification checklist framework.

Highlights:
- Versioned verification report contract stored in operation_runs.context.verification_report (DB-only viewer).
- Strict sanitizer/redaction (evidence pointers only; no tokens/headers/payloads) + schema validation.
- Centralized BADGE-001 semantics for check status, severity, and overall report outcome.
- Deterministic start (dedupe while active) via shared StartVerification service; capability-first authorization (non-member 404, member missing capability 403).
- Completion audit event (verification.completed) with redacted metadata.
- Integrations: OperationRun detail viewer, onboarding wizard verification step, provider connection start surfaces.

Tests:
- vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Verification tests/Unit/Badges/VerificationBadgesTest.php
- vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@MacBookPro.fritz.box>
Reviewed-on: #89

app/Filament/Pages/Workspaces/ManagedTenantOnboardingWizard.php

@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
 namespace App\Filament\Pages\Workspaces;
 
 use App\Filament\Pages\TenantDashboard;
+use App\Filament\Support\VerificationReportViewer;
 use App\Jobs\ProviderComplianceSnapshotJob;
-use App\Jobs\ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob;
 use App\Jobs\ProviderInventorySyncJob;
 use App\Models\OperationRun;
 use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
@@ -15,15 +15,17 @@
 use App\Models\TenantOnboardingSession;
 use App\Models\User;
 use App\Models\Workspace;
+use App\Models\WorkspaceMembership;
 use App\Services\Audit\WorkspaceAuditLogger;
 use App\Services\Auth\TenantMembershipManager;
 use App\Services\OperationRunService;
 use App\Services\Providers\CredentialManager;
 use App\Services\Providers\ProviderOperationRegistry;
-use App\Services\Providers\ProviderOperationStartGate;
+use App\Services\Verification\StartVerification;
 use App\Support\Audit\AuditActionId;
 use App\Support\Auth\Capabilities;
 use App\Support\OperationRunLinks;
+use App\Support\Rbac\UiEnforcement;
 use App\Support\Workspaces\WorkspaceContext;
 use Filament\Actions\Action;
 use Filament\Forms\Components\CheckboxList;
@@ -37,6 +39,7 @@
 use Filament\Schemas\Components\Section;
 use Filament\Schemas\Components\Text;
 use Filament\Schemas\Components\Utilities\Get;
+use Filament\Schemas\Components\View;
 use Filament\Schemas\Components\Wizard;
 use Filament\Schemas\Components\Wizard\Step;
 use Filament\Schemas\Schema;
@@ -236,14 +239,21 @@ public function content(Schema $schema): Schema
                         ->schema([
                             Section::make('Verification')
                                 ->schema([
-                                    Text::make(fn (): string => 'Status: '.$this->verificationStatusLabel())
-                                        ->badge()
-                                        ->color(fn (): string => $this->verificationHasSucceeded() ? 'success' : 'warning'),
+                                    View::make('filament.components.verification-report-viewer')
+                                        ->viewData(fn (): array => [
+                                            'report' => $this->verificationReport(),
+                                        ]),
                                     SchemaActions::make([
+                                        UiEnforcement::forTableAction(
                                             Action::make('wizardStartVerification')
                                                 ->label('Start verification')
                                                 ->visible(fn (): bool => $this->managedTenant instanceof Tenant)
                                                 ->action(fn () => $this->startVerification()),
+                                            fn (): ?Tenant => $this->managedTenant,
+                                        )
+                                            ->preserveVisibility()
+                                            ->requireCapability(Capabilities::PROVIDER_RUN)
+                                            ->apply(),
                                         Action::make('wizardViewVerificationRun')
                                             ->label('View run')
                                             ->url(fn (): ?string => $this->verificationRunUrl())
@@ -467,6 +477,37 @@ private function verificationRunUrl(): ?string
         return OperationRunLinks::view($runId, $this->managedTenant);
     }
 
+    /**
+     * @return array<string, mixed>|null
+     */
+    private function verificationReport(): ?array
+    {
+        if (! $this->managedTenant instanceof Tenant) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        if (! $this->onboardingSession instanceof TenantOnboardingSession) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        $runId = $this->onboardingSession->state['verification_operation_run_id'] ?? null;
+
+        if (! is_int($runId)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        $run = OperationRun::query()
+            ->where('tenant_id', (int) $this->managedTenant->getKey())
+            ->whereKey($runId)
+            ->first();
+
+        if (! $run instanceof OperationRun) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        return VerificationReportViewer::report($run);
+    }
+
     private function bootstrapRunsLabel(): string
     {
         if (! $this->onboardingSession instanceof TenantOnboardingSession) {
@@ -819,6 +860,24 @@ public function startVerification(): void
             abort(404);
         }
 
+        if (! $user->canAccessTenant($tenant)) {
+            $workspaceMembership = WorkspaceMembership::query()
+                ->where('workspace_id', (int) $this->workspace->getKey())
+                ->where('user_id', (int) $user->getKey())
+                ->first();
+
+            $role = is_string($workspaceMembership?->role ?? null) ? (string) $workspaceMembership->role : 'readonly';
+
+            app(TenantMembershipManager::class)->addMember(
+                tenant: $tenant,
+                actor: $user,
+                member: $user,
+                role: $role,
+                source: 'manual',
+                sourceRef: 'managed_tenant_onboarding',
+            );
+        }
+
         $connection = $this->resolveSelectedProviderConnection($tenant);
 
         if (! $connection instanceof ProviderConnection) {
@@ -831,18 +890,9 @@ public function startVerification(): void
             return;
         }
 
-        $result = app(ProviderOperationStartGate::class)->start(
+        $result = app(StartVerification::class)->providerConnectionCheck(
             tenant: $tenant,
             connection: $connection,
-            operationType: 'provider.connection.check',
-            dispatcher: function (OperationRun $run) use ($tenant, $user, $connection): void {
-                ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob::dispatch(
-                    tenantId: (int) $tenant->getKey(),
-                    userId: (int) $user->getKey(),
-                    providerConnectionId: (int) $connection->getKey(),
-                    operationRun: $run,
-                );
-            },
             initiator: $user,
             extraContext: [
                 'wizard' => [

app/Filament/Resources/OperationRunResource.php

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 namespace App\Filament\Resources;
 
 use App\Filament\Resources\OperationRunResource\Pages;
+use App\Filament\Support\VerificationReportViewer;
 use App\Models\OperationRun;
 use App\Models\Tenant;
 use App\Support\Badges\BadgeDomain;
@@ -136,12 +137,35 @@ public static function infolist(Schema $schema): Schema
                     ->visible(fn (OperationRun $record): bool => ! empty($record->failure_summary))
                     ->columnSpanFull(),
 
+                Section::make('Verification report')
+                    ->schema([
+                        ViewEntry::make('verification_report')
+                            ->label('')
+                            ->view('filament.components.verification-report-viewer')
+                            ->state(fn (OperationRun $record): ?array => VerificationReportViewer::report($record))
+                            ->columnSpanFull(),
+                    ])
+                    ->visible(fn (OperationRun $record): bool => VerificationReportViewer::shouldRenderForRun($record))
+                    ->columnSpanFull(),
+
                 Section::make('Context')
                     ->schema([
                         ViewEntry::make('context')
                             ->label('')
                             ->view('filament.infolists.entries.snapshot-json')
-                            ->state(fn (OperationRun $record): array => $record->context ?? [])
+                            ->state(function (OperationRun $record): array {
+                                $context = $record->context ?? [];
+                                $context = is_array($context) ? $context : [];
+
+                                if (array_key_exists('verification_report', $context)) {
+                                    $context['verification_report'] = [
+                                        'redacted' => true,
+                                        'note' => 'Rendered in the Verification report section.',
+                                    ];
+                                }
+
+                                return $context;
+                            })
                             ->columnSpanFull(),
                     ])
                     ->columnSpanFull(),

app/Filament/Resources/ProviderConnectionResource.php

@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
 use App\Filament\Concerns\ScopesGlobalSearchToTenant;
 use App\Filament\Resources\ProviderConnectionResource\Pages;
 use App\Jobs\ProviderComplianceSnapshotJob;
-use App\Jobs\ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob;
 use App\Jobs\ProviderInventorySyncJob;
 use App\Models\OperationRun;
 use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
@@ -15,6 +14,7 @@
 use App\Services\Intune\AuditLogger;
 use App\Services\Providers\CredentialManager;
 use App\Services\Providers\ProviderOperationStartGate;
+use App\Services\Verification\StartVerification;
 use App\Support\Auth\Capabilities;
 use App\Support\Badges\BadgeDomain;
 use App\Support\Badges\BadgeRenderer;
@@ -175,29 +175,22 @@ public static function table(Table $table): Table
                             ->icon('heroicon-o-check-badge')
                             ->color('success')
                             ->visible(fn (ProviderConnection $record): bool => $record->status !== 'disabled')
-                            ->action(function (ProviderConnection $record, ProviderOperationStartGate $gate): void {
+                            ->action(function (ProviderConnection $record, StartVerification $verification): void {
                                 $tenant = Tenant::current();
                                 $user = auth()->user();
 
-                                if (! $tenant instanceof Tenant || ! $user instanceof User) {
-                                    return;
+                                if (! $tenant instanceof Tenant) {
+                                    abort(404);
                                 }
 
-                                $initiator = $user;
+                                if (! $user instanceof User) {
+                                    abort(403);
+                                }
 
-                                $result = $gate->start(
+                                $result = $verification->providerConnectionCheck(
                                     tenant: $tenant,
                                     connection: $record,
-                                    operationType: 'provider.connection.check',
-                                    dispatcher: function (OperationRun $operationRun) use ($tenant, $initiator, $record): void {
-                                        ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob::dispatch(
-                                            tenantId: (int) $tenant->getKey(),
-                                            userId: (int) $initiator->getKey(),
-                                            providerConnectionId: (int) $record->getKey(),
-                                            operationRun: $operationRun,
-                                        );
-                                    },
-                                    initiator: $initiator,
+                                    initiator: $user,
                                 );
 
                                 if ($result->status === 'scope_busy') {

app/Filament/Resources/ProviderConnectionResource/Pages/EditProviderConnection.php

@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
 
 use App\Filament\Resources\ProviderConnectionResource;
 use App\Jobs\ProviderComplianceSnapshotJob;
-use App\Jobs\ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob;
 use App\Jobs\ProviderInventorySyncJob;
 use App\Models\OperationRun;
 use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
@@ -14,6 +13,7 @@
 use App\Services\Intune\AuditLogger;
 use App\Services\Providers\CredentialManager;
 use App\Services\Providers\ProviderOperationStartGate;
+use App\Services\Verification\StartVerification;
 use App\Support\Auth\Capabilities;
 use App\Support\OperationRunLinks;
 use App\Support\Rbac\UiEnforcement;
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ protected function getHeaderActions(): array
                                 && $user->canAccessTenant($tenant)
                                 && $record->status !== 'disabled';
                         })
-                        ->action(function (ProviderConnection $record, ProviderOperationStartGate $gate): void {
+                        ->action(function (ProviderConnection $record, StartVerification $verification): void {
                             $tenant = Tenant::current();
                             $user = auth()->user();
 
@@ -185,18 +185,9 @@ protected function getHeaderActions(): array
 
                             $initiator = $user;
 
-                            $result = $gate->start(
+                            $result = $verification->providerConnectionCheck(
                                 tenant: $tenant,
                                 connection: $record,
-                                operationType: 'provider.connection.check',
-                                dispatcher: function (OperationRun $operationRun) use ($tenant, $initiator, $record): void {
-                                    ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob::dispatch(
-                                        tenantId: (int) $tenant->getKey(),
-                                        userId: (int) $initiator->getKey(),
-                                        providerConnectionId: (int) $record->getKey(),
-                                        operationRun: $operationRun,
-                                    );
-                                },
                                 initiator: $initiator,
                             );
 

app/Filament/Support/VerificationReportViewer.php

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+namespace App\Filament\Support;
+
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use App\Support\Verification\VerificationReportSanitizer;
+use App\Support\Verification\VerificationReportSchema;
+
+final class VerificationReportViewer
+{
+    /**
+     * @return array<string, mixed>|null
+     */
+    public static function report(OperationRun $run): ?array
+    {
+        $context = is_array($run->context) ? $run->context : [];
+        $report = $context['verification_report'] ?? null;
+
+        if (! is_array($report)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        $report = VerificationReportSanitizer::sanitizeReport($report);
+
+        if (! VerificationReportSchema::isValidReport($report)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        return $report;
+    }
+
+    public static function shouldRenderForRun(OperationRun $run): bool
+    {
+        $context = is_array($run->context) ? $run->context : [];
+
+        if (array_key_exists('verification_report', $context)) {
+            return true;
+        }
+
+        return in_array((string) $run->type, ['provider.connection.check'], true);
+    }
+}

app/Jobs/ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob.php

@@ -7,11 +7,14 @@
 use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
 use App\Models\Tenant;
 use App\Models\User;
+use App\Services\Audit\WorkspaceAuditLogger;
 use App\Services\OperationRunService;
 use App\Services\Providers\Contracts\HealthResult;
 use App\Services\Providers\MicrosoftProviderHealthCheck;
+use App\Support\Audit\AuditActionId;
 use App\Support\OperationRunOutcome;
 use App\Support\OperationRunStatus;
+use App\Support\Verification\VerificationReportWriter;
 use Illuminate\Bus\Queueable;
 use Illuminate\Contracts\Queue\ShouldQueue;
 use Illuminate\Foundation\Bus\Dispatchable;
@@ -83,17 +86,64 @@ public function handle(
 
         $this->updateRunTargetScope($this->operationRun, $connection, $entraTenantName);
 
+        $report = VerificationReportWriter::write(
+            run: $this->operationRun,
+            checks: [
+                [
+                    'key' => 'provider.connection.check',
+                    'title' => 'Provider connection check',
+                    'status' => $result->healthy ? 'pass' : 'fail',
+                    'severity' => $result->healthy ? 'info' : 'critical',
+                    'blocking' => ! $result->healthy,
+                    'reason_code' => $result->healthy ? 'ok' : ($result->reasonCode ?? 'unknown_error'),
+                    'message' => $result->healthy ? 'Connection is healthy.' : ($result->message ?? 'Health check failed.'),
+                    'evidence' => array_values(array_filter([
+                        [
+                            'kind' => 'provider_connection_id',
+                            'value' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+                        ],
+                        [
+                            'kind' => 'entra_tenant_id',
+                            'value' => (string) $connection->entra_tenant_id,
+                        ],
+                        is_numeric($result->meta['http_status'] ?? null) ? [
+                            'kind' => 'http_status',
+                            'value' => (int) $result->meta['http_status'],
+                        ] : null,
+                        is_string($result->meta['organization_id'] ?? null) ? [
+                            'kind' => 'organization_id',
+                            'value' => (string) $result->meta['organization_id'],
+                        ] : null,
+                    ])),
+                    'next_steps' => $result->healthy
+                        ? []
+                        : [[
+                            'label' => 'Review provider connection',
+                            'url' => \App\Filament\Resources\ProviderConnectionResource::getUrl('edit', [
+                                'record' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+                            ], tenant: $tenant),
+                        ]],
+                ],
+            ],
+            identity: [
+                'provider_connection_id' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+                'entra_tenant_id' => (string) $connection->entra_tenant_id,
+            ],
+        );
+
         if ($result->healthy) {
-            $runs->updateRun(
+            $run = $runs->updateRun(
                 $this->operationRun,
                 status: OperationRunStatus::Completed->value,
                 outcome: OperationRunOutcome::Succeeded->value,
             );
 
+            $this->logVerificationCompletion($tenant, $user, $run, $report);
+
             return;
         }
 
-        $runs->updateRun(
+        $run = $runs->updateRun(
             $this->operationRun,
             status: OperationRunStatus::Completed->value,
             outcome: OperationRunOutcome::Failed->value,
@@ -103,6 +153,8 @@ public function handle(
                 'message' => $result->message ?? 'Health check failed.',
             ]],
         );
+
+        $this->logVerificationCompletion($tenant, $user, $run, $report);
     }
 
     private function resolveEntraTenantName(ProviderConnection $connection, HealthResult $result): ?string
@@ -145,4 +197,34 @@ private function applyHealthResult(ProviderConnection $connection, HealthResult
             'last_error_message' => $result->healthy ? null : $result->message,
         ]);
     }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $report
+     */
+    private function logVerificationCompletion(Tenant $tenant, User $actor, OperationRun $run, array $report): void
+    {
+        $workspace = $tenant->workspace;
+
+        if (! $workspace) {
+            return;
+        }
+
+        $counts = $report['summary']['counts'] ?? [];
+        $counts = is_array($counts) ? $counts : [];
+
+        app(WorkspaceAuditLogger::class)->log(
+            workspace: $workspace,
+            action: AuditActionId::VerificationCompleted->value,
+            context: [
+                'metadata' => [
+                    'operation_run_id' => (int) $run->getKey(),
+                    'counts' => $counts,
+                ],
+            ],
+            actor: $actor,
+            status: $run->outcome === OperationRunOutcome::Succeeded->value ? 'success' : 'failed',
+            resourceType: 'operation_run',
+            resourceId: (string) $run->getKey(),
+        );
+    }
 }

app/Services/Verification/StartVerification.php

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+namespace App\Services\Verification;
+
+use App\Jobs\ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
+use App\Models\Tenant;
+use App\Models\User;
+use App\Services\Providers\ProviderOperationStartGate;
+use App\Services\Providers\ProviderOperationStartResult;
+use App\Support\Auth\Capabilities;
+use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Gate;
+use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Exception\NotFoundHttpException;
+
+final class StartVerification
+{
+    public function __construct(
+        private readonly ProviderOperationStartGate $providers,
+    ) {}
+
+    /**
+     * Start (or dedupe) a provider-connection verification run.
+     *
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $extraContext
+     */
+    public function providerConnectionCheck(
+        Tenant $tenant,
+        ProviderConnection $connection,
+        User $initiator,
+        array $extraContext = [],
+    ): ProviderOperationStartResult {
+        if (! $initiator->canAccessTenant($tenant)) {
+            throw new NotFoundHttpException;
+        }
+
+        Gate::forUser($initiator)->authorize(Capabilities::PROVIDER_RUN, $tenant);
+
+        return $this->providers->start(
+            tenant: $tenant,
+            connection: $connection,
+            operationType: 'provider.connection.check',
+            dispatcher: function (OperationRun $run) use ($tenant, $initiator, $connection): void {
+                ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob::dispatch(
+                    tenantId: (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+                    userId: (int) $initiator->getKey(),
+                    providerConnectionId: (int) $connection->getKey(),
+                    operationRun: $run,
+                );
+            },
+            initiator: $initiator,
+            extraContext: $extraContext,
+        );
+    }
+}

app/Support/Audit/AuditActionId.php

@@ -27,4 +27,6 @@ enum AuditActionId: string
     case ManagedTenantOnboardingStart = 'managed_tenant_onboarding.start';
     case ManagedTenantOnboardingResume = 'managed_tenant_onboarding.resume';
     case ManagedTenantOnboardingVerificationStart = 'managed_tenant_onboarding.verification_start';
+
+    case VerificationCompleted = 'verification.completed';
 }

app/Support/Badges/BadgeCatalog.php

@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ final class BadgeCatalog
         BadgeDomain::RestoreResultStatus->value => Domains\RestoreResultStatusBadge::class,
         BadgeDomain::ProviderConnectionStatus->value => Domains\ProviderConnectionStatusBadge::class,
         BadgeDomain::ProviderConnectionHealth->value => Domains\ProviderConnectionHealthBadge::class,
+        BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckStatus->value => Domains\VerificationCheckStatusBadge::class,
+        BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckSeverity->value => Domains\VerificationCheckSeverityBadge::class,
+        BadgeDomain::VerificationReportOverall->value => Domains\VerificationReportOverallBadge::class,
     ];
 
     /**

app/Support/Badges/BadgeDomain.php

@@ -28,4 +28,7 @@ enum BadgeDomain: string
     case RestoreResultStatus = 'restore_result_status';
     case ProviderConnectionStatus = 'provider_connection.status';
     case ProviderConnectionHealth = 'provider_connection.health';
+    case VerificationCheckStatus = 'verification_check_status';
+    case VerificationCheckSeverity = 'verification_check_severity';
+    case VerificationReportOverall = 'verification_report_overall';
 }

app/Support/Badges/Domains/VerificationCheckSeverityBadge.php

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Badges\Domains;
+
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeCatalog;
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeMapper;
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeSpec;
+use App\Support\Verification\VerificationCheckSeverity;
+
+final class VerificationCheckSeverityBadge implements BadgeMapper
+{
+    public function spec(mixed $value): BadgeSpec
+    {
+        $state = BadgeCatalog::normalizeState($value);
+
+        return match ($state) {
+            VerificationCheckSeverity::Info->value => new BadgeSpec('Info', 'gray', 'heroicon-m-information-circle'),
+            VerificationCheckSeverity::Low->value => new BadgeSpec('Low', 'info', 'heroicon-m-arrow-down'),
+            VerificationCheckSeverity::Medium->value => new BadgeSpec('Medium', 'warning', 'heroicon-m-exclamation-triangle'),
+            VerificationCheckSeverity::High->value => new BadgeSpec('High', 'danger', 'heroicon-m-exclamation-triangle'),
+            VerificationCheckSeverity::Critical->value => new BadgeSpec('Critical', 'danger', 'heroicon-m-x-circle'),
+            default => BadgeSpec::unknown(),
+        };
+    }
+}

app/Support/Badges/Domains/VerificationCheckStatusBadge.php

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Badges\Domains;
+
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeCatalog;
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeMapper;
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeSpec;
+use App\Support\Verification\VerificationCheckStatus;
+
+final class VerificationCheckStatusBadge implements BadgeMapper
+{
+    public function spec(mixed $value): BadgeSpec
+    {
+        $state = BadgeCatalog::normalizeState($value);
+
+        return match ($state) {
+            VerificationCheckStatus::Pass->value => new BadgeSpec('Pass', 'success', 'heroicon-m-check-circle'),
+            VerificationCheckStatus::Fail->value => new BadgeSpec('Fail', 'danger', 'heroicon-m-x-circle'),
+            VerificationCheckStatus::Warn->value => new BadgeSpec('Warn', 'warning', 'heroicon-m-exclamation-triangle'),
+            VerificationCheckStatus::Skip->value => new BadgeSpec('Skipped', 'gray', 'heroicon-m-minus-circle'),
+            VerificationCheckStatus::Running->value => new BadgeSpec('Running', 'info', 'heroicon-m-arrow-path'),
+            default => BadgeSpec::unknown(),
+        };
+    }
+}

app/Support/Badges/Domains/VerificationReportOverallBadge.php

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Badges\Domains;
+
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeCatalog;
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeMapper;
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeSpec;
+use App\Support\Verification\VerificationReportOverall;
+
+final class VerificationReportOverallBadge implements BadgeMapper
+{
+    public function spec(mixed $value): BadgeSpec
+    {
+        $state = BadgeCatalog::normalizeState($value);
+
+        return match ($state) {
+            VerificationReportOverall::Ready->value => new BadgeSpec('Ready', 'success', 'heroicon-m-check-circle'),
+            VerificationReportOverall::NeedsAttention->value => new BadgeSpec('Needs attention', 'warning', 'heroicon-m-exclamation-triangle'),
+            VerificationReportOverall::Blocked->value => new BadgeSpec('Blocked', 'danger', 'heroicon-m-x-circle'),
+            VerificationReportOverall::Running->value => new BadgeSpec('Running', 'info', 'heroicon-m-arrow-path'),
+            default => BadgeSpec::unknown(),
+        };
+    }
+}

app/Support/Verification/VerificationCheckSeverity.php

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Verification;
+
+enum VerificationCheckSeverity: string
+{
+    case Info = 'info';
+    case Low = 'low';
+    case Medium = 'medium';
+    case High = 'high';
+    case Critical = 'critical';
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<int, string>
+     */
+    public static function values(): array
+    {
+        return array_map(static fn (self $case): string => $case->value, self::cases());
+    }
+}

app/Support/Verification/VerificationCheckStatus.php

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Verification;
+
+enum VerificationCheckStatus: string
+{
+    case Pass = 'pass';
+    case Fail = 'fail';
+    case Warn = 'warn';
+    case Skip = 'skip';
+    case Running = 'running';
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<int, string>
+     */
+    public static function values(): array
+    {
+        return array_map(static fn (self $case): string => $case->value, self::cases());
+    }
+}

app/Support/Verification/VerificationReportOverall.php

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Verification;
+
+enum VerificationReportOverall: string
+{
+    case Ready = 'ready';
+    case NeedsAttention = 'needs_attention';
+    case Blocked = 'blocked';
+    case Running = 'running';
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<int, string>
+     */
+    public static function values(): array
+    {
+        return array_map(static fn (self $case): string => $case->value, self::cases());
+    }
+}

app/Support/Verification/VerificationReportSanitizer.php

@@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Verification;
+
+final class VerificationReportSanitizer
+{
+    /**
+     * @var array<int, string>
+     */
+    private const FORBIDDEN_KEY_SUBSTRINGS = [
+        'access_token',
+        'refresh_token',
+        'client_secret',
+        'authorization',
+        'password',
+        'cookie',
+        'set-cookie',
+    ];
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<string, mixed>
+     */
+    public static function sanitizeReport(array $report): array
+    {
+        $sanitized = [];
+
+        $schemaVersion = self::sanitizeShortString($report['schema_version'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+        if ($schemaVersion !== null) {
+            $sanitized['schema_version'] = $schemaVersion;
+        }
+
+        $flow = self::sanitizeShortString($report['flow'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+        if ($flow !== null) {
+            $sanitized['flow'] = $flow;
+        }
+
+        $generatedAt = self::sanitizeShortString($report['generated_at'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+        if ($generatedAt !== null) {
+            $sanitized['generated_at'] = $generatedAt;
+        }
+
+        if (is_array($report['identity'] ?? null)) {
+            $identity = self::sanitizeIdentity((array) $report['identity']);
+
+            if ($identity !== []) {
+                $sanitized['identity'] = $identity;
+            }
+        }
+
+        $summary = is_array($report['summary'] ?? null) ? (array) $report['summary'] : [];
+        $summary = self::sanitizeSummary($summary);
+
+        if ($summary !== null) {
+            $sanitized['summary'] = $summary;
+        }
+
+        $checks = is_array($report['checks'] ?? null) ? (array) $report['checks'] : [];
+        $checks = self::sanitizeChecks($checks);
+
+        if ($checks !== null) {
+            $sanitized['checks'] = $checks;
+        }
+
+        return $sanitized;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $identity
+     * @return array<string, int|string>
+     */
+    private static function sanitizeIdentity(array $identity): array
+    {
+        $sanitized = [];
+
+        foreach ($identity as $key => $value) {
+            if (! is_string($key) || trim($key) === '') {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            if (self::containsForbiddenKeySubstring($key)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            if (is_int($value)) {
+                $sanitized[$key] = $value;
+
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            if (! is_string($value)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $value = self::sanitizeValueString($value);
+
+            if ($value !== null) {
+                $sanitized[$key] = $value;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return $sanitized;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $summary
+     * @return array{overall: string, counts: array{total: int, pass: int, fail: int, warn: int, skip: int, running: int}}|null
+     */
+    private static function sanitizeSummary(array $summary): ?array
+    {
+        $overall = $summary['overall'] ?? null;
+
+        if (! is_string($overall) || ! in_array($overall, VerificationReportOverall::values(), true)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        $counts = is_array($summary['counts'] ?? null) ? (array) $summary['counts'] : [];
+
+        foreach (['total', 'pass', 'fail', 'warn', 'skip', 'running'] as $key) {
+            if (! is_int($counts[$key] ?? null) || $counts[$key] < 0) {
+                return null;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return [
+            'overall' => $overall,
+            'counts' => [
+                'total' => $counts['total'],
+                'pass' => $counts['pass'],
+                'fail' => $counts['fail'],
+                'warn' => $counts['warn'],
+                'skip' => $counts['skip'],
+                'running' => $counts['running'],
+            ],
+        ];
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<int, mixed>  $checks
+     * @return array<int, array<string, mixed>>|null
+     */
+    private static function sanitizeChecks(array $checks): ?array
+    {
+        if ($checks === []) {
+            return [];
+        }
+
+        $sanitized = [];
+
+        foreach ($checks as $check) {
+            if (! is_array($check)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $key = self::sanitizeShortString($check['key'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+            $title = self::sanitizeShortString($check['title'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+            $reasonCode = self::sanitizeShortString($check['reason_code'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+
+            if ($key === null || $title === null || $reasonCode === null) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $status = $check['status'] ?? null;
+            if (! is_string($status) || ! in_array($status, VerificationCheckStatus::values(), true)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $severity = $check['severity'] ?? null;
+            if (! is_string($severity) || ! in_array($severity, VerificationCheckSeverity::values(), true)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $messageRaw = $check['message'] ?? null;
+            if (! is_string($messageRaw) || trim($messageRaw) === '') {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $blocking = is_bool($check['blocking'] ?? null) ? (bool) $check['blocking'] : false;
+
+            $sanitized[] = [
+                'key' => $key,
+                'title' => $title,
+                'status' => $status,
+                'severity' => $severity,
+                'blocking' => $blocking,
+                'reason_code' => $reasonCode,
+                'message' => self::sanitizeMessage($messageRaw),
+                'evidence' => self::sanitizeEvidence(is_array($check['evidence'] ?? null) ? (array) $check['evidence'] : []),
+                'next_steps' => self::sanitizeNextSteps(is_array($check['next_steps'] ?? null) ? (array) $check['next_steps'] : []),
+            ];
+        }
+
+        return $sanitized;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<int, mixed>  $evidence
+     * @return array<int, array{kind: string, value: int|string}>
+     */
+    private static function sanitizeEvidence(array $evidence): array
+    {
+        $sanitized = [];
+
+        foreach ($evidence as $pointer) {
+            if (! is_array($pointer)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $kind = $pointer['kind'] ?? null;
+            if (! is_string($kind) || trim($kind) === '') {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            if (self::containsForbiddenKeySubstring($kind)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $value = $pointer['value'] ?? null;
+
+            if (is_int($value)) {
+                $sanitized[] = ['kind' => trim($kind), 'value' => $value];
+
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            if (! is_string($value)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $sanitizedValue = self::sanitizeValueString($value);
+
+            if ($sanitizedValue === null) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $sanitized[] = ['kind' => trim($kind), 'value' => $sanitizedValue];
+        }
+
+        return $sanitized;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<int, mixed>  $nextSteps
+     * @return array<int, array{label: string, url: string}>
+     */
+    private static function sanitizeNextSteps(array $nextSteps): array
+    {
+        $sanitized = [];
+
+        foreach ($nextSteps as $step) {
+            if (! is_array($step)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $label = self::sanitizeShortString($step['label'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+            $url = self::sanitizeShortString($step['url'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+
+            if ($label === null || $url === null) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $sanitized[] = [
+                'label' => $label,
+                'url' => $url,
+            ];
+        }
+
+        return $sanitized;
+    }
+
+    private static function sanitizeMessage(mixed $message): string
+    {
+        if (! is_string($message)) {
+            return '—';
+        }
+
+        $message = trim(str_replace(["\r", "\n"], ' ', $message));
+
+        $message = preg_replace('/\bAuthorization\s*:\s*[^\s]+(?:\s+[^\s]+)?/i', '[REDACTED_AUTH]', $message) ?? $message;
+        $message = preg_replace('/\bBearer\s+[A-Za-z0-9\-\._~\+\/]+=*\b/i', '[REDACTED_AUTH]', $message) ?? $message;
+
+        $message = preg_replace('/\b(access_token|refresh_token|client_secret|password)\b\s*[:=]\s*[^\s,;]+/i', '[REDACTED_SECRET]', $message) ?? $message;
+        $message = preg_replace('/"(access_token|refresh_token|client_secret|password)"\s*:\s*"[^"]*"/i', '"[REDACTED]":"[REDACTED]"', $message) ?? $message;
+
+        $message = preg_replace('/\b[A-Za-z0-9\-\._~\+\/]{64,}\b/', '[REDACTED]', $message) ?? $message;
+
+        $message = str_ireplace(
+            ['client_secret', 'access_token', 'refresh_token', 'authorization', 'bearer '],
+            '[REDACTED]',
+            $message,
+        );
+
+        $message = trim($message);
+
+        return $message === '' ? '—' : substr($message, 0, 240);
+    }
+
+    private static function sanitizeShortString(mixed $value, ?string $fallback): ?string
+    {
+        if (! is_string($value)) {
+            return $fallback;
+        }
+
+        $value = trim($value);
+
+        if ($value === '') {
+            return $fallback;
+        }
+
+        if (self::containsForbiddenKeySubstring($value)) {
+            return $fallback;
+        }
+
+        return substr($value, 0, 200);
+    }
+
+    private static function sanitizeValueString(string $value): ?string
+    {
+        $value = trim($value);
+
+        if ($value === '') {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        if (preg_match('/\bBearer\s+[A-Za-z0-9\-\._~\+\/]+=*\b/i', $value)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        if (strlen($value) > 512) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        if (preg_match('/\b[A-Za-z0-9\-\._~\+\/]{128,}\b/', $value)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        $lower = strtolower($value);
+        foreach (self::FORBIDDEN_KEY_SUBSTRINGS as $needle) {
+            if (str_contains($lower, $needle)) {
+                return null;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return $value;
+    }
+
+    private static function containsForbiddenKeySubstring(string $value): bool
+    {
+        $lower = strtolower($value);
+
+        foreach (self::FORBIDDEN_KEY_SUBSTRINGS as $needle) {
+            if (str_contains($lower, $needle)) {
+                return true;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return false;
+    }
+}

app/Support/Verification/VerificationReportSchema.php

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+<?php
+
+namespace App\Support\Verification;
+
+use DateTimeImmutable;
+
+final class VerificationReportSchema
+{
+    public const string CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION = '1.0.0';
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<string, mixed>|null
+     */
+    public static function normalizeReport(mixed $report): ?array
+    {
+        if (! is_array($report)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        if (! self::isValidReport($report)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        return $report;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $report
+     */
+    public static function isValidReport(array $report): bool
+    {
+        $schemaVersion = self::schemaVersion($report);
+        if ($schemaVersion === null || ! self::isSupportedSchemaVersion($schemaVersion)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($report['flow'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (! self::isIsoDateTimeString($report['generated_at'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (array_key_exists('identity', $report) && ! is_array($report['identity'])) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $summary = $report['summary'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_array($summary)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $overall = $summary['overall'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_string($overall) || ! in_array($overall, VerificationReportOverall::values(), true)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $counts = $summary['counts'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_array($counts)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        foreach (['total', 'pass', 'fail', 'warn', 'skip', 'running'] as $key) {
+            if (! self::isNonNegativeInt($counts[$key] ?? null)) {
+                return false;
+            }
+        }
+
+        $checks = $report['checks'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_array($checks)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        foreach ($checks as $check) {
+            if (! is_array($check) || ! self::isValidCheckResult($check)) {
+                return false;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $report
+     */
+    public static function schemaVersion(array $report): ?string
+    {
+        $candidate = $report['schema_version'] ?? null;
+
+        if (! is_string($candidate)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        $candidate = trim($candidate);
+
+        if ($candidate === '') {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        if (! preg_match('/^\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/', $candidate)) {
+            return null;
+        }
+
+        return $candidate;
+    }
+
+    public static function isSupportedSchemaVersion(string $schemaVersion): bool
+    {
+        $parts = explode('.', $schemaVersion, 3);
+
+        if (count($parts) !== 3) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $major = (int) $parts[0];
+
+        return $major === 1;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $check
+     */
+    private static function isValidCheckResult(array $check): bool
+    {
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($check['key'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($check['title'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $status = $check['status'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_string($status) || ! in_array($status, VerificationCheckStatus::values(), true)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $severity = $check['severity'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_string($severity) || ! in_array($severity, VerificationCheckSeverity::values(), true)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (! is_bool($check['blocking'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($check['reason_code'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($check['message'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $evidence = $check['evidence'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_array($evidence)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        foreach ($evidence as $pointer) {
+            if (! is_array($pointer) || ! self::isValidEvidencePointer($pointer)) {
+                return false;
+            }
+        }
+
+        $nextSteps = $check['next_steps'] ?? null;
+        if (! is_array($nextSteps)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        foreach ($nextSteps as $step) {
+            if (! is_array($step) || ! self::isValidNextStep($step)) {
+                return false;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $pointer
+     */
+    private static function isValidEvidencePointer(array $pointer): bool
+    {
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($pointer['kind'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        $value = $pointer['value'] ?? null;
+
+        return is_int($value) || self::isNonEmptyString($value);
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $step
+     */
+    private static function isValidNextStep(array $step): bool
+    {
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($step['label'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($step['url'] ?? null)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    private static function isNonEmptyString(mixed $value): bool
+    {
+        return is_string($value) && trim($value) !== '';
+    }
+
+    private static function isNonNegativeInt(mixed $value): bool
+    {
+        return is_int($value) && $value >= 0;
+    }
+
+    private static function isIsoDateTimeString(mixed $value): bool
+    {
+        if (! self::isNonEmptyString($value)) {
+            return false;
+        }
+
+        try {
+            new DateTimeImmutable((string) $value);
+
+            return true;
+        } catch (\Throwable) {
+            return false;
+        }
+    }
+}

app/Support/Verification/VerificationReportWriter.php

@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+namespace App\Support\Verification;
+
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+
+final class VerificationReportWriter
+{
+    /**
+     * Baseline reason code taxonomy (v1).
+     *
+     * @var array<int, string>
+     */
+    private const array BASELINE_REASON_CODES = [
+        'ok',
+        'not_applicable',
+        'missing_configuration',
+        'permission_denied',
+        'authentication_failed',
+        'throttled',
+        'dependency_unreachable',
+        'invalid_state',
+        'unknown_error',
+    ];
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<int, array<string, mixed>>  $checks
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $identity
+     * @return array<string, mixed>
+     */
+    public static function write(OperationRun $run, array $checks, array $identity = []): array
+    {
+        $flow = is_string($run->type) && trim($run->type) !== '' ? (string) $run->type : 'unknown';
+
+        $report = self::build($flow, $checks, $identity);
+        $report = VerificationReportSanitizer::sanitizeReport($report);
+
+        if (! VerificationReportSchema::isValidReport($report)) {
+            $report = VerificationReportSanitizer::sanitizeReport(self::buildFallbackReport($flow));
+        }
+
+        $context = is_array($run->context) ? $run->context : [];
+        $context['verification_report'] = $report;
+
+        $run->update(['context' => $context]);
+
+        return $report;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<int, array<string, mixed>>  $checks
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $identity
+     * @return array<string, mixed>
+     */
+    public static function build(string $flow, array $checks, array $identity = []): array
+    {
+        $flow = trim($flow);
+        $flow = $flow !== '' ? $flow : 'unknown';
+
+        $normalizedChecks = [];
+
+        foreach ($checks as $check) {
+            if (! is_array($check)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $normalizedChecks[] = self::normalizeCheckResult($check);
+        }
+
+        $counts = self::deriveCounts($normalizedChecks);
+
+        $report = [
+            'schema_version' => VerificationReportSchema::CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION,
+            'flow' => $flow,
+            'generated_at' => now()->toISOString(),
+            'summary' => [
+                'overall' => self::deriveOverall($normalizedChecks, $counts),
+                'counts' => $counts,
+            ],
+            'checks' => $normalizedChecks,
+        ];
+
+        if ($identity !== []) {
+            $report['identity'] = $identity;
+        }
+
+        return $report;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<string, mixed>
+     */
+    private static function buildFallbackReport(string $flow): array
+    {
+        return [
+            'schema_version' => VerificationReportSchema::CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION,
+            'flow' => $flow !== '' ? $flow : 'unknown',
+            'generated_at' => now()->toISOString(),
+            'summary' => [
+                'overall' => VerificationReportOverall::NeedsAttention->value,
+                'counts' => [
+                    'total' => 0,
+                    'pass' => 0,
+                    'fail' => 0,
+                    'warn' => 0,
+                    'skip' => 0,
+                    'running' => 0,
+                ],
+            ],
+            'checks' => [],
+        ];
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<string, mixed>  $check
+     * @return array{
+     *   key: string,
+     *   title: string,
+     *   status: string,
+     *   severity: string,
+     *   blocking: bool,
+     *   reason_code: string,
+     *   message: string,
+     *   evidence: array<int, array{kind: string, value: int|string}>,
+     *   next_steps: array<int, array{label: string, url: string}>
+     * }
+     */
+    private static function normalizeCheckResult(array $check): array
+    {
+        $key = self::normalizeNonEmptyString($check['key'] ?? null, fallback: 'unknown_check');
+        $title = self::normalizeNonEmptyString($check['title'] ?? null, fallback: 'Check');
+
+        return [
+            'key' => $key,
+            'title' => $title,
+            'status' => self::normalizeCheckStatus($check['status'] ?? null),
+            'severity' => self::normalizeCheckSeverity($check['severity'] ?? null),
+            'blocking' => is_bool($check['blocking'] ?? null) ? (bool) $check['blocking'] : false,
+            'reason_code' => self::normalizeReasonCode($check['reason_code'] ?? null),
+            'message' => self::normalizeNonEmptyString($check['message'] ?? null, fallback: '—'),
+            'evidence' => self::normalizeEvidence($check['evidence'] ?? null),
+            'next_steps' => self::normalizeNextSteps($check['next_steps'] ?? null),
+        ];
+    }
+
+    private static function normalizeCheckStatus(mixed $status): string
+    {
+        if (! is_string($status)) {
+            return VerificationCheckStatus::Fail->value;
+        }
+
+        $status = strtolower(trim($status));
+
+        return in_array($status, VerificationCheckStatus::values(), true)
+            ? $status
+            : VerificationCheckStatus::Fail->value;
+    }
+
+    private static function normalizeCheckSeverity(mixed $severity): string
+    {
+        if (! is_string($severity)) {
+            return VerificationCheckSeverity::Info->value;
+        }
+
+        $severity = strtolower(trim($severity));
+
+        return in_array($severity, VerificationCheckSeverity::values(), true)
+            ? $severity
+            : VerificationCheckSeverity::Info->value;
+    }
+
+    private static function normalizeReasonCode(mixed $reasonCode): string
+    {
+        if (! is_string($reasonCode)) {
+            return 'unknown_error';
+        }
+
+        $reasonCode = strtolower(trim($reasonCode));
+
+        if ($reasonCode === '') {
+            return 'unknown_error';
+        }
+
+        if (str_starts_with($reasonCode, 'ext.')) {
+            return $reasonCode;
+        }
+
+        $reasonCode = match ($reasonCode) {
+            'graph_throttled' => 'throttled',
+            'graph_timeout', 'provider_outage' => 'dependency_unreachable',
+            'provider_auth_failed' => 'authentication_failed',
+            'validation_error', 'conflict_detected' => 'invalid_state',
+            'unknown' => 'unknown_error',
+            default => $reasonCode,
+        };
+
+        return in_array($reasonCode, self::BASELINE_REASON_CODES, true) ? $reasonCode : 'unknown_error';
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<int, array{kind: string, value: int|string}>
+     */
+    private static function normalizeEvidence(mixed $evidence): array
+    {
+        if (! is_array($evidence)) {
+            return [];
+        }
+
+        $normalized = [];
+
+        foreach ($evidence as $pointer) {
+            if (! is_array($pointer)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $kind = self::normalizeNonEmptyString($pointer['kind'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+            $value = $pointer['value'] ?? null;
+
+            if ($kind === null) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            if (! is_int($value) && ! is_string($value)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            if (is_string($value) && trim($value) === '') {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $normalized[] = [
+                'kind' => $kind,
+                'value' => is_int($value) ? $value : trim($value),
+            ];
+        }
+
+        return $normalized;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @return array<int, array{label: string, url: string}>
+     */
+    private static function normalizeNextSteps(mixed $steps): array
+    {
+        if (! is_array($steps)) {
+            return [];
+        }
+
+        $normalized = [];
+
+        foreach ($steps as $step) {
+            if (! is_array($step)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $label = self::normalizeNonEmptyString($step['label'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+            $url = self::normalizeNonEmptyString($step['url'] ?? null, fallback: null);
+
+            if ($label === null || $url === null) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $normalized[] = [
+                'label' => $label,
+                'url' => $url,
+            ];
+        }
+
+        return $normalized;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<int, array{status: string, blocking: bool}>  $checks
+     * @return array{total: int, pass: int, fail: int, warn: int, skip: int, running: int}
+     */
+    private static function deriveCounts(array $checks): array
+    {
+        $counts = [
+            'total' => count($checks),
+            'pass' => 0,
+            'fail' => 0,
+            'warn' => 0,
+            'skip' => 0,
+            'running' => 0,
+        ];
+
+        foreach ($checks as $check) {
+            $status = $check['status'] ?? null;
+
+            if (! is_string($status) || ! array_key_exists($status, $counts)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            $counts[$status] += 1;
+        }
+
+        return $counts;
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @param  array<int, array{status: string, blocking: bool}>  $checks
+     * @param  array{total: int, pass: int, fail: int, warn: int, skip: int, running: int}  $counts
+     */
+    private static function deriveOverall(array $checks, array $counts): string
+    {
+        if (($counts['running'] ?? 0) > 0) {
+            return VerificationReportOverall::Running->value;
+        }
+
+        if (($counts['total'] ?? 0) === 0) {
+            return VerificationReportOverall::NeedsAttention->value;
+        }
+
+        foreach ($checks as $check) {
+            if (($check['status'] ?? null) === VerificationCheckStatus::Fail->value && ($check['blocking'] ?? false) === true) {
+                return VerificationReportOverall::Blocked->value;
+            }
+        }
+
+        if (($counts['fail'] ?? 0) > 0 || ($counts['warn'] ?? 0) > 0) {
+            return VerificationReportOverall::NeedsAttention->value;
+        }
+
+        return VerificationReportOverall::Ready->value;
+    }
+
+    private static function normalizeNonEmptyString(mixed $value, ?string $fallback): ?string
+    {
+        if (! is_string($value)) {
+            return $fallback;
+        }
+
+        $value = trim($value);
+
+        if ($value === '') {
+            return $fallback;
+        }
+
+        return $value;
+    }
+}

resources/views/filament/components/verification-report-viewer.blade.php

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+@php
+    $report = isset($getState) ? $getState() : ($report ?? null);
+    $report = is_array($report) ? $report : null;
+
+    $summary = $report['summary'] ?? null;
+    $summary = is_array($summary) ? $summary : null;
+
+    $counts = $summary['counts'] ?? null;
+    $counts = is_array($counts) ? $counts : [];
+
+    $checks = $report['checks'] ?? null;
+    $checks = is_array($checks) ? $checks : [];
+@endphp
+
+<div class="space-y-4">
+    @if ($report === null || $summary === null)
+        <div class="rounded-lg border border-gray-200 bg-white p-4 text-sm text-gray-600 shadow-sm dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-900 dark:text-gray-300">
+            <div class="font-medium text-gray-900 dark:text-white">
+                Verification report unavailable
+            </div>
+            <div class="mt-1">
+                This run doesn’t have a report yet. If it’s still running, refresh in a moment. If it already completed, start verification again.
+            </div>
+        </div>
+    @else
+        @php
+            $overallSpec = \App\Support\Badges\BadgeRenderer::spec(
+                \App\Support\Badges\BadgeDomain::VerificationReportOverall,
+                $summary['overall'] ?? null,
+            );
+        @endphp
+
+        <div class="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2">
+            <x-filament::badge :color="$overallSpec->color" :icon="$overallSpec->icon">
+                {{ $overallSpec->label }}
+            </x-filament::badge>
+
+            <x-filament::badge color="gray">
+                {{ (int) ($counts['total'] ?? 0) }} total
+            </x-filament::badge>
+            <x-filament::badge color="success">
+                {{ (int) ($counts['pass'] ?? 0) }} pass
+            </x-filament::badge>
+            <x-filament::badge color="danger">
+                {{ (int) ($counts['fail'] ?? 0) }} fail
+            </x-filament::badge>
+            <x-filament::badge color="warning">
+                {{ (int) ($counts['warn'] ?? 0) }} warn
+            </x-filament::badge>
+            <x-filament::badge color="gray">
+                {{ (int) ($counts['skip'] ?? 0) }} skip
+            </x-filament::badge>
+            <x-filament::badge color="info">
+                {{ (int) ($counts['running'] ?? 0) }} running
+            </x-filament::badge>
+        </div>
+
+        @if ($checks === [])
+            <div class="rounded-lg border border-gray-200 bg-white p-4 text-sm text-gray-600 shadow-sm dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-900 dark:text-gray-300">
+                No checks found in this report. Start verification again to generate a fresh report.
+            </div>
+        @else
+            <div class="space-y-3">
+                @foreach ($checks as $check)
+                    @php
+                        $check = is_array($check) ? $check : [];
+
+                        $title = $check['title'] ?? 'Check';
+                        $title = is_string($title) && trim($title) !== '' ? $title : 'Check';
+
+                        $message = $check['message'] ?? null;
+                        $message = is_string($message) && trim($message) !== '' ? $message : null;
+
+                        $statusSpec = \App\Support\Badges\BadgeRenderer::spec(
+                            \App\Support\Badges\BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckStatus,
+                            $check['status'] ?? null,
+                        );
+
+                        $severitySpec = \App\Support\Badges\BadgeRenderer::spec(
+                            \App\Support\Badges\BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckSeverity,
+                            $check['severity'] ?? null,
+                        );
+
+                        $evidence = $check['evidence'] ?? [];
+                        $evidence = is_array($evidence) ? $evidence : [];
+
+                        $nextSteps = $check['next_steps'] ?? [];
+                        $nextSteps = is_array($nextSteps) ? $nextSteps : [];
+                    @endphp
+
+                    <details class="rounded-lg border border-gray-200 bg-white p-4 shadow-sm dark:border-gray-800 dark:bg-gray-900">
+                        <summary class="flex cursor-pointer items-start justify-between gap-4">
+                            <div class="space-y-1">
+                                <div class="text-sm font-medium text-gray-900 dark:text-white">
+                                    {{ $title }}
+                                </div>
+                                @if ($message)
+                                    <div class="text-sm text-gray-600 dark:text-gray-300">
+                                        {{ $message }}
+                                    </div>
+                                @endif
+                            </div>
+
+                            <div class="flex shrink-0 flex-wrap items-center justify-end gap-2">
+                                <x-filament::badge :color="$severitySpec->color" :icon="$severitySpec->icon" size="sm">
+                                    {{ $severitySpec->label }}
+                                </x-filament::badge>
+                                <x-filament::badge :color="$statusSpec->color" :icon="$statusSpec->icon" size="sm">
+                                    {{ $statusSpec->label }}
+                                </x-filament::badge>
+                            </div>
+                        </summary>
+
+                        @if ($evidence !== [] || $nextSteps !== [])
+                            <div class="mt-4 space-y-4">
+                                @if ($evidence !== [])
+                                    <div>
+                                        <div class="text-xs font-semibold uppercase tracking-wide text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400">
+                                            Evidence
+                                        </div>
+                                        <ul class="mt-2 space-y-1 text-sm text-gray-700 dark:text-gray-200">
+                                            @foreach ($evidence as $pointer)
+                                                @php
+                                                    $pointer = is_array($pointer) ? $pointer : [];
+                                                    $kind = $pointer['kind'] ?? null;
+                                                    $value = $pointer['value'] ?? null;
+                                                @endphp
+
+                                                @if (is_string($kind) && $kind !== '' && (is_string($value) || is_int($value)))
+                                                    <li>
+                                                        <span class="font-medium">{{ $kind }}:</span>
+                                                        <span>{{ is_int($value) ? $value : $value }}</span>
+                                                    </li>
+                                                @endif
+                                            @endforeach
+                                        </ul>
+                                    </div>
+                                @endif
+
+                                @if ($nextSteps !== [])
+                                    <div>
+                                        <div class="text-xs font-semibold uppercase tracking-wide text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400">
+                                            Next steps
+                                        </div>
+                                        <ul class="mt-2 space-y-1 text-sm">
+                                            @foreach ($nextSteps as $step)
+                                                @php
+                                                    $step = is_array($step) ? $step : [];
+                                                    $label = $step['label'] ?? null;
+                                                    $url = $step['url'] ?? null;
+                                                    $isExternal = is_string($url) && (str_starts_with($url, 'http://') || str_starts_with($url, 'https://'));
+                                                @endphp
+
+                                                @if (is_string($label) && $label !== '' && is_string($url) && $url !== '')
+                                                    <li>
+                                                        <a
+                                                            href="{{ $url }}"
+                                                            class="text-primary-600 hover:underline dark:text-primary-400"
+                                                            @if ($isExternal)
+                                                                target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
+                                                            @endif
+                                                        >
+                                                            {{ $label }}
+                                                        </a>
+                                                    </li>
+                                                @endif
+                                            @endforeach
+                                        </ul>
+                                    </div>
+                                @endif
+                            </div>
+                        @endif
+                    </details>
+                @endforeach
+            </div>
+        @endif
+    @endif
+</div>

specs/074-verification-checklist/checklists/requirements.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# Specification Quality Checklist: Verification Checklist Framework (Enterprise-Ready)
+
+**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+**Created**: 2026-02-03
+**Feature**: [specs/074-verification-checklist/spec.md](../spec.md)
+
+## Content Quality
+
+- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
+- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+- [x] All mandatory sections completed
+
+## Requirement Completeness
+
+- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+- [x] Success criteria are measurable
+- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+- [x] Edge cases are identified
+- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
+- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+
+## Feature Readiness
+
+- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
+- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
+
+## Notes
+
+- Validation pass (2026-02-03): Spec avoids framework specifics and focuses on contract + UX outcomes. Next step is planning to translate these requirements into a minimal set of deliverables (report schema, viewer, authorization semantics, audit events, and adoption points).

specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/fail.json

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
+  "flow": "provider.connection.check",
+  "generated_at": "2026-02-03T22:00:00Z",
+  "identity": {
+    "provider_connection_id": 123
+  },
+  "summary": {
+    "overall": "blocked",
+    "counts": {
+      "total": 2,
+      "pass": 1,
+      "fail": 1,
+      "warn": 0,
+      "skip": 0,
+      "running": 0
+    }
+  },
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.token_acquisition",
+      "title": "Token acquisition works",
+      "status": "fail",
+      "severity": "high",
+      "blocking": true,
+      "reason_code": "authentication_failed",
+      "message": "The app cannot acquire a token with the configured credentials.",
+      "evidence": [
+        { "kind": "provider_connection_id", "value": 123 }
+      ],
+      "next_steps": [
+        { "label": "Review connection credentials", "url": "/admin/provider-connections/123/edit" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.permissions",
+      "title": "Required permissions are granted",
+      "status": "pass",
+      "severity": "info",
+      "blocking": false,
+      "reason_code": "ok",
+      "message": "The configured app permissions meet the required baseline.",
+      "evidence": [],
+      "next_steps": []
+    }
+  ]
+}

specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/pass.json

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
+  "flow": "provider.connection.check",
+  "generated_at": "2026-02-03T22:00:00Z",
+  "summary": {
+    "overall": "ready",
+    "counts": {
+      "total": 1,
+      "pass": 1,
+      "fail": 0,
+      "warn": 0,
+      "skip": 0,
+      "running": 0
+    }
+  },
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.health",
+      "title": "Provider connection is healthy",
+      "status": "pass",
+      "severity": "info",
+      "blocking": false,
+      "reason_code": "ok",
+      "message": "The provider connection passed all required health checks.",
+      "evidence": [],
+      "next_steps": []
+    }
+  ]
+}

specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/running.json

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
+  "flow": "provider.connection.check",
+  "generated_at": "2026-02-03T22:00:00Z",
+  "summary": {
+    "overall": "running",
+    "counts": {
+      "total": 3,
+      "pass": 1,
+      "fail": 0,
+      "warn": 0,
+      "skip": 0,
+      "running": 2
+    }
+  },
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.token_acquisition",
+      "title": "Token acquisition works",
+      "status": "running",
+      "severity": "info",
+      "blocking": false,
+      "reason_code": "ok",
+      "message": "Check is currently running.",
+      "evidence": [],
+      "next_steps": []
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.permissions",
+      "title": "Required permissions are granted",
+      "status": "running",
+      "severity": "info",
+      "blocking": false,
+      "reason_code": "ok",
+      "message": "Check is currently running.",
+      "evidence": [],
+      "next_steps": []
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.health",
+      "title": "Provider connection is healthy",
+      "status": "pass",
+      "severity": "info",
+      "blocking": false,
+      "reason_code": "ok",
+      "message": "The provider connection passed all required health checks.",
+      "evidence": [],
+      "next_steps": []
+    }
+  ]
+}

specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/warn.json

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
+  "flow": "provider.connection.check",
+  "generated_at": "2026-02-03T22:00:00Z",
+  "summary": {
+    "overall": "needs_attention",
+    "counts": {
+      "total": 2,
+      "pass": 1,
+      "fail": 0,
+      "warn": 1,
+      "skip": 0,
+      "running": 0
+    }
+  },
+  "checks": [
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.optional_metadata",
+      "title": "Optional metadata is present",
+      "status": "warn",
+      "severity": "medium",
+      "blocking": false,
+      "reason_code": "missing_configuration",
+      "message": "Some optional metadata is missing; this may reduce diagnostics quality.",
+      "evidence": [],
+      "next_steps": [
+        { "label": "Open provider connection settings", "url": "/admin/provider-connections" }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "key": "provider_connection.health",
+      "title": "Provider connection is healthy",
+      "status": "pass",
+      "severity": "info",
+      "blocking": false,
+      "reason_code": "ok",
+      "message": "The provider connection passed all required health checks.",
+      "evidence": [],
+      "next_steps": []
+    }
+  ]
+}

specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/reason-codes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+# Reason Codes (074)
+
+This file defines the baseline `reason_code` taxonomy for verification check results.
+
+## Rules
+
+- Reason codes are **stable** and **machine-readable**.
+- New codes must be appended (avoid renames) to keep support and automation stable.
+- Flow/check-specific codes must use the reserved namespace: `ext.*`.
+
+## Baseline Codes (v1)
+
+- `ok` — Check passed.
+- `not_applicable` — Check skipped because it doesn’t apply to this identity/scope.
+- `missing_configuration` — Required config is absent.
+- `permission_denied` — Insufficient permissions / consent missing.
+- `authentication_failed` — Token acquisition or auth precondition failed.
+- `throttled` — Remote dependency throttled (e.g., 429/503) and check could not complete.
+- `dependency_unreachable` — Remote dependency unavailable.
+- `invalid_state` — Local model state conflicts with required preconditions.
+- `unknown_error` — Failure could not be classified.
+
+## Reserved Extension Namespace
+
+- `ext.<flow>.<detail>` — Flow-specific extensions.
+  - Example: `ext.managed_tenant_onboarding.role_mapping_missing`

specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/verification-report.schema.json

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+{
+  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+  "$id": "https://tenantpilot.local/contracts/verification-report.schema.json",
+  "title": "VerificationReport",
+  "type": "object",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "required": [
+    "schema_version",
+    "flow",
+    "generated_at",
+    "summary",
+    "checks"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "schema_version": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "description": "Version of the verification report schema (SemVer)."
+    },
+    "flow": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "description": "Verification flow identifier (v1 aligns with OperationRun.type)."
+    },
+    "generated_at": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "format": "date-time"
+    },
+    "identity": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "description": "Scope identifiers for what is being verified.",
+      "additionalProperties": true
+    },
+    "summary": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "required": ["overall", "counts"],
+      "properties": {
+        "overall": {
+          "type": "string",
+          "enum": ["ready", "needs_attention", "blocked", "running"],
+          "description": "Overall state derived from check results."
+        },
+        "counts": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "additionalProperties": false,
+          "required": ["total", "pass", "fail", "warn", "skip", "running"],
+          "properties": {
+            "total": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 0},
+            "pass": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 0},
+            "fail": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 0},
+            "warn": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 0},
+            "skip": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 0},
+            "running": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 0}
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "checks": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "minItems": 0,
+      "items": {"$ref": "#/$defs/CheckResult"}
+    }
+  },
+  "$defs": {
+    "CheckResult": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "required": [
+        "key",
+        "title",
+        "status",
+        "severity",
+        "blocking",
+        "reason_code",
+        "message",
+        "evidence",
+        "next_steps"
+      ],
+      "properties": {
+        "key": {"type": "string"},
+        "title": {"type": "string"},
+        "status": {
+          "type": "string",
+          "enum": ["pass", "fail", "warn", "skip", "running"]
+        },
+        "severity": {
+          "type": "string",
+          "enum": ["info", "low", "medium", "high", "critical"]
+        },
+        "blocking": {"type": "boolean"},
+        "reason_code": {"type": "string"},
+        "message": {"type": "string"},
+        "evidence": {
+          "type": "array",
+          "items": {"$ref": "#/$defs/EvidencePointer"}
+        },
+        "next_steps": {
+          "type": "array",
+          "description": "Navigation-only CTAs (links) in v1.",
+          "items": {"$ref": "#/$defs/NextStep"}
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "EvidencePointer": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "required": ["kind", "value"],
+      "properties": {
+        "kind": {"type": "string"},
+        "value": {
+          "description": "Safe pointer value (ID/masked string/hash).",
+          "oneOf": [
+            {"type": "integer"},
+            {"type": "string"}
+          ]
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "NextStep": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "required": ["label", "url"],
+      "properties": {
+        "label": {"type": "string"},
+        "url": {"type": "string"}
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}

specs/074-verification-checklist/data-model.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+# Data Model: Verification Checklist Framework (074)
+
+## Overview
+
+This feature introduces a *versioned verification report document* attached to an existing `OperationRun`.
+No new database tables are required for v1.
+
+## Existing Entities Used
+
+### OperationRun (`operation_runs`)
+
+Selected fields:
+- `id`
+- `tenant_id`
+- `user_id`
+- `type` (used as the verification flow identifier)
+- `status` (`queued` | `running` | `completed`)
+- `outcome` (`pending` | `succeeded` | `failed`)
+- `summary_counts` (JSONB)
+- `failure_summary` (JSONB)
+- `context` (JSONB)
+- `started_at`, `completed_at`
+
+Idempotency:
+- DB-enforced dedupe for active runs via partial unique index on `(tenant_id, run_identity_hash)` where `status IN ('queued','running')`.
+
+## New Logical Data (stored inside OperationRun context)
+
+### VerificationReport (`operation_runs.context.verification_report`)
+
+- Stored as JSON in `context` under `verification_report`.
+- Versioned by `schema_version`.
+- Rendered DB-only (no external calls during view).
+
+High-level shape (see `contracts/verification-report.schema.json` for the canonical contract):
+- `schema_version`
+- `flow` (identifier; for v1 this can align with `operation_runs.type`)
+- `identity` (scope identifiers such as `tenant_id`, `provider_connection_id`, etc.)
+- `generated_at`
+- `summary` (counts, overall state)
+- `checks[]` (check results)
+
+### CheckResult (within `checks[]`)
+
+- `key`, `title`
+- `status`: `pass|fail|warn|skip|running`
+- `severity`: `info|low|medium|high|critical`
+- `blocking`: boolean
+- `reason_code`
+- `message`
+- `evidence[]`: safe pointers only
+- `next_steps[]`: links only in v1
+
+## Audit
+
+Verification start and completion are recorded in `audit_logs` using stable `action` identifiers (via `App\Support\Audit\AuditActionId`). Metadata is minimal and sanitized.
+
+## Notes / Constraints
+
+- Viewer must be DB-only: rendering the report must not dispatch jobs or perform HTTP.
+- Evidence must be redacted/safe: no secrets/tokens/payload dumps in stored or rendered report.

specs/074-verification-checklist/plan.md

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+# Implementation Plan: Verification Checklist Framework (Enterprise-Ready)
+
+**Branch**: `074-verification-checklist` | **Date**: 2026-02-03 | **Spec**: [spec.md](./spec.md)
+**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/074-verification-checklist/spec.md`
+
+**Note**: This file is generated from the plan template and then filled in by `/speckit.plan` workflow steps.
+
+## Summary
+
+- Introduce a versioned “verification report” contract that can be attached to an existing `OperationRun` and rendered consistently across multiple flows.
+- Provide a reusable, DB-only report viewer (no outbound calls during render/hydration/poll) that presents summary + per-check statuses + safe evidence pointers + navigation-only next steps.
+- Enforce enterprise semantics: stable reason codes, strict evidence redaction, deterministic active-run dedupe, and capability-first authorization aligned with RBAC-UX (non-members 404; members missing start capability 403).
+- Emit audit events for verification start + completion using stable action identifiers with redacted metadata.
+
+## Technical Context
+
+**Language/Version**: PHP 8.4 (Laravel 12)
+**Primary Dependencies**: Laravel 12 + Filament v5 + Livewire v4
+**Storage**: PostgreSQL (Sail) with JSONB (`operation_runs.context`)
+**Testing**: Pest (PHPUnit)
+**Target Platform**: Web application (Sail/Docker locally; container deploy via Dokploy)
+**Project Type**: web
+**Performance Goals**: Verification viewer renders fast from DB-only JSON (typical report ≤ 50 checks)
+**Constraints**: Viewer is read-only and must not trigger any outbound HTTP or job dispatch; evidence must not contain secrets/tokens/payloads; new status-like badges must use centralized BADGE-001 mapping.
+**Scale/Scope**: Multiple tenants/workspaces; many runs over time; verification used in onboarding + provider ops + future readiness flows
+
+## Constitution Check
+
+*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
+
+- Inventory-first, snapshots-second: PASS (this feature is run/report UX; no inventory semantics changed).
+- Read/write separation: PASS (viewer is read-only; start surfaces enqueue-only and already follow `OperationRun` patterns).
+- Graph contract path: PASS (viewer performs no Graph calls; verification execution remains in queued jobs that already follow provider gateway patterns).
+- Deterministic capabilities: PASS (start/view gates reference the existing capability registry; no role-string checks).
+- RBAC-UX: PASS (non-member tenant access is 404; member-but-missing-capability is 403; server-side gates enforce mutations/starts).
+- Run observability: PASS (verification is represented as `OperationRun`; active-run dedupe enforced by the existing partial unique index on `(tenant_id, run_identity_hash)` for active statuses).
+- Data minimization: PASS (report evidence constrained to safe pointers; audit metadata redacted; no secrets in stored report).
+- Badge semantics (BADGE-001): PASS (plan includes adding a centralized badge domain for check statuses/severity; no ad-hoc UI mappings).
+
+## Project Structure
+
+### Documentation (this feature)
+
+```text
+specs/074-verification-checklist/
+├── plan.md              # This file
+├── research.md          # Phase 0 output
+├── data-model.md        # Phase 1 output
+├── quickstart.md        # Phase 1 output
+├── contracts/           # Phase 1 output
+└── tasks.md             # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks)
+```
+
+### Source Code (repository root)
+
+```text
+app/
+├── Filament/
+├── Jobs/
+├── Models/
+├── Policies/
+├── Services/
+└── Support/
+
+config/
+database/
+resources/
+routes/
+tests/
+```
+
+**Structure Decision**: Single Laravel web application with Filament admin panel. The framework is implemented as:
+- contract + helpers under `app/Support/**`
+- report writer invoked from queued jobs under `app/Jobs/**` / `app/Services/**`
+- viewer UI as Filament schema components and Blade views under `app/Filament/**` and `resources/views/filament/**`
+- authorization via existing capabilities/gates/policies
+
+## Complexity Tracking
+
+No constitution violations required for this feature.
+
+## Phase 0 — Research (output: `research.md`)
+
+See: [research.md](./research.md)
+
+Goals:
+- Confirm the canonical storage location for the report (DB-only render) using existing `operation_runs.context` JSONB.
+- Confirm active-run dedupe behavior and ensure it matches the spec’s “dedupe while active only” requirement.
+- Confirm the correct approach for status-like UI badges in Filament (BADGE-001), so the viewer doesn’t introduce ad-hoc mappings.
+- Confirm the existing audit logger + redaction utilities and define stable action IDs for verification completion.
+
+## Phase 1 — Design & Contracts (outputs: `data-model.md`, `contracts/`, `quickstart.md`)
+
+See:
+- [data-model.md](./data-model.md)
+- [contracts/](./contracts/)
+- [quickstart.md](./quickstart.md)
+
+Design focus:
+- Report schema: versioned JSON document (checks + counts + timestamps + next steps) stored in `operation_runs.context.verification_report`.
+- Reason codes: baseline set + reserved `ext.*` namespace.
+- Evidence redaction: strict sanitizer so reports never store or render secrets/tokens/payloads.
+- Viewer: reusable Filament view entry / component that renders summary + per-check details without any outbound calls.
+- Authorization: view allowed for tenant-scoped members; start requires capability; non-member access is deny-as-not-found.
+- Auditing: start + completion events logged with minimal redacted metadata.
+
+## Phase 2 — Implementation Outline (tasks created in `/speckit.tasks`)
+
+- Contract: create a canonical report schema (JSON Schema + example) and a small baseline reason-code list.
+- Writer: add a `VerificationReportWriter` (or equivalent) that normalizes check results, enforces redaction rules, and writes the report into `OperationRun->context`.
+- Viewer: add a reusable Filament UI renderer (Blade view + helper) that displays summary, counts, statuses, and next steps (links-only).
+- Integration points:
+  - Show the verification report section in Monitoring → Operations run detail when present.
+  - Embed the same viewer in onboarding and provider connection verification flows.
+- RBAC & UX:
+  - Enforce “view vs start” split (view allowed for tenant members; start capability required).
+  - Preserve RBAC-UX semantics (non-members 404; members missing capability 403).
+- Audit:
+  - Keep existing start audit event; add a completion audit event emitted when the verification run finalizes.
+- Tests (Pest):
+  - Viewer is DB-only (Http::fake + render assertion).
+  - Evidence redaction rules (report contains no forbidden keys/values).
+  - Dedupe semantics reuse active run (leveraging the existing partial unique index behavior).
+
+## Constitution Check (Post-Design)
+
+Re-check result: PASS. Design artifacts keep verification viewing DB-only, align with run observability + dedupe, enforce RBAC-UX semantics, and centralize status badge mappings.

specs/074-verification-checklist/quickstart.md

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+# Quickstart: Verification Checklist Framework (074)
+
+This quickstart explains how to *write* and *render* a verification report attached to an `OperationRun`.
+
+## 1) Writing a report (queued job / service)
+
+**Goal**: produce a `verification_report` JSON document and store it in `OperationRun->context`.
+
+Guidelines:
+- Generate reports inside queued execution (not in a Filament page render).
+- Keep evidence pointer-only (IDs/masked/hashes), never raw payloads or tokens.
+- Keep next steps navigation-only in v1.
+
+Pseudo-code sketch:
+
+```php
+$context = is_array($run->context) ? $run->context : [];
+
+$context['verification_report'] = [
+    'schema_version' => '1.0',
+    'flow' => $run->type,
+    'generated_at' => now('UTC')->toIso8601String(),
+    'identity' => [
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $run->tenant_id,
+        'provider_connection_id' => (int) data_get($run->context, 'provider_connection_id', 0),
+    ],
+    'summary' => [
+        'overall' => 'needs_attention',
+        'counts' => [
+            'total' => 5,
+            'pass' => 3,
+            'fail' => 2,
+            'warn' => 0,
+            'skip' => 0,
+            'running' => 0,
+        ],
+    ],
+    'checks' => [
+        [
+            'key' => 'provider_connection.token_acquisition',
+            'title' => 'Token acquisition works',
+            'status' => 'fail',
+            'severity' => 'high',
+            'blocking' => true,
+            'reason_code' => 'permission_denied',
+            'message' => 'The app cannot acquire a token with the configured credentials.',
+            'evidence' => [
+                ['kind' => 'provider_connection_id', 'value' => (int) data_get($run->context, 'provider_connection_id')],
+            ],
+            'next_steps' => [
+                ['label' => 'Review connection credentials', 'url' => '/admin/...'],
+                ['label' => 'Microsoft docs: app permissions', 'url' => 'https://learn.microsoft.com/...'],
+            ],
+        ],
+    ],
+];
+
+$run->update(['context' => $context]);
+```
+
+## 2) Rendering the report (Filament, DB-only)
+
+Recommended integration points:
+- Monitoring → Operations: in the `OperationRun` view page, show a “Verification report” section when `context.verification_report` exists.
+- Flow pages (e.g., onboarding wizard): embed the same viewer component using the run ID stored in wizard state.
+
+**Hard requirement**: rendering must not trigger any outbound HTTP (no Graph calls, no jobs dispatched, no side effects).
+
+## 3) Authorization split
+
+- Viewing a report: allowed for tenant-scoped members.
+- Starting verification: requires a specific capability.
+- Non-members: deny-as-not-found (404) for tenant-scoped pages and actions.
+
+## 4) Tests to add
+
+- Viewer DB-only render test: `Http::fake()` + assert no requests during render.
+- Evidence redaction test: report JSON contains none of `access_token`, `client_secret`, `Authorization`, bearer tokens, or raw payload dumps.
+- Dedupe test: repeated starts while active reuse the same run.

specs/074-verification-checklist/research.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# Research: Verification Checklist Framework (074)
+
+**Date**: 2026-02-03  
+**Phase**: Phase 0 (Foundational Research)  
+**Status**: Complete
+
+---
+
+## Decisions
+
+### D-001 — Canonical storage location for verification reports
+
+**Decision**: Store the verification report in `operation_runs.context.verification_report` (JSONB).
+
+**Rationale**:
+- Monitoring pages must be DB-only at render time (constitution: Operations / Run Observability Standard).
+- `OperationRun` is the canonical operational record; keeping the report attached avoids new tables/indexing for v1.
+- The existing UI already renders `OperationRun.context` safely as JSON, so we can progressively enhance into a structured viewer.
+
+**Alternatives considered**:
+- Dedicated `verification_reports` table: rejected for v1 to keep adoption lightweight; can be introduced later if querying/indexing becomes necessary.
+
+---
+
+### D-002 — Idempotency / dedupe mechanism
+
+**Decision**: Use the existing `OperationRunService::ensureRunWithIdentity()` mechanism and the DB partial unique index on `(tenant_id, run_identity_hash)` for active statuses (`queued`, `running`).
+
+**Rationale**:
+- This repo already enforces active-run dedupe at the DB level via `operation_runs_active_unique`.
+- Matches the clarified spec policy: dedupe only while a run is active; completed runs allow a new run.
+
+**Alternatives considered**:
+- Application-only locks/dedupe: rejected as non-race-safe.
+
+---
+
+### D-003 — Flow identifier and identity scope
+
+**Decision**: Treat `OperationRun.type` as the primary flow identifier for the verification run, and keep additional flow details (wizard step, etc.) in `context`.
+
+**Rationale**:
+- Existing operations already key UX semantics (labels, polling, related links) off `OperationRun.type`.
+- Dedupe identity hashing already includes `type`, making flow part of the dedupe boundary.
+
+**Alternatives considered**:
+- Separate `flow_id` column: rejected for v1 (schema change not required).
+
+---
+
+### D-004 — Reason code taxonomy and extensions
+
+**Decision**: Maintain a small baseline set of cross-cutting reason codes, and reserve `ext.*` for flow/check-specific extensions.
+
+**Rationale**:
+- Prevents brittle UI parsing and enables future automation.
+- Keeps room for flow-specific details without polluting the baseline vocabulary.
+
+**Alternatives considered**:
+- Free-form codes everywhere: rejected due to support/automation cost.
+
+---
+
+### D-005 — Evidence policy (strict safe pointers)
+
+**Decision**: Evidence fields in check results are *strictly* structured safe pointers only (IDs, masked strings, hashes). No payloads, tokens, claims, headers, or full error bodies.
+
+**Rationale**:
+- Aligns with constitution data-minimization and safe logging rules.
+- Avoids accidentally persisting secrets inside run context.
+
+**Alternatives considered**:
+- Storing raw error payloads: rejected for security and compliance risk.
+
+---
+
+### D-006 — UI semantics for statuses and badges
+
+**Decision**: Render status-like values (check status, severity) via centralized badge semantics (BADGE-001), not ad-hoc mappings in feature pages.
+
+**Rationale**:
+- Prevents drift in meaning/colors across the suite.
+- Enables straightforward regression tests for new/changed status values.
+
+**Alternatives considered**:
+- Inline color mapping inside a Blade view: rejected (violates BADGE-001).

specs/074-verification-checklist/spec.md

@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+# Feature Specification: Verification Checklist Framework (Enterprise-Ready)
+
+**Feature Branch**: `074-verification-checklist`  
+**Created**: 2026-02-03  
+**Status**: Draft  
+**Input**: User description: "Replace binary verification UX with a structured, reusable verification checklist attached to verification runs; DB-only viewing; enterprise semantics (reason codes, audit, idempotency, RBAC)."
+
+## Clarifications
+
+### Session 2026-02-03
+
+- Q: What idempotency policy do we want for “Start verification”? → A: Dedupe only while a run is active (queued/running); once completed/failed, “Start verification” creates a new run.
+- Q: Who should be allowed to view verification reports? → A: Any authenticated workspace member with access to the tenant scope may view reports; starting verification requires a separate capability.
+- Q: What policy should we use for `reason_code` taxonomy? → A: Versioned central taxonomy with a small baseline set + reserved `ext.*` namespace for feature-specific extensions.
+- Q: What’s the required evidence/redaction policy for `evidence` in check results? → A: Evidence is strictly structured safe pointers only (internal IDs, masked strings, hashes); never raw payloads, tokens, claims, headers, or full error bodies.
+- Q: Should “Next steps” CTAs be links only, or can they trigger server-side actions? → A: Links only (navigation-only) in v1.
+
+## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
+
+<!--
+  IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
+  Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
+  you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
+  
+  Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
+  Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
+  - Developed independently
+  - Tested independently
+  - Deployed independently
+  - Demonstrated to users independently
+-->
+
+### User Story 1 - Operator sees what’s wrong (Priority: P1)
+
+As a workspace member onboarding or operating a managed tenant, I can run “Verify access” and see a structured checklist that clearly shows which checks passed, which failed, and what to do next.
+
+**Why this priority**: This is the primary value of verification: reduce ambiguity and enable fast, correct remediation.
+
+**Independent Test**: Seed a verification run with a report containing mixed outcomes and confirm the viewer renders an accurate summary, per-check status, and next steps without making any external calls.
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** a completed verification run with 2 failed checks, **When** I open the verification report viewer, **Then** I see an overall summary (“Needs attention” or “Blocked”), counts, and the two failed checks with actionable next steps.
+2. **Given** a verification run that is still in progress, **When** I open the viewer, **Then** I see a “Running” state and partial results (if available) without errors.
+
+---
+
+### User Story 2 - Deterministic starts (idempotency / dedupe) (Priority: P2)
+
+As an operator, if I click “Start verification” multiple times for the same tenant + provider connection + flow, the system behaves deterministically: it does not start duplicate active runs and guides me to the already-running run.
+
+**Why this priority**: Prevents confusing duplicates, reduces load, and makes support/debugging repeatable.
+
+**Independent Test**: Attempt to start verification twice for the same identity and assert that only one active run exists and the UI returns a consistent “already running” outcome.
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** an active verification run exists for the same identity, **When** I click “Start verification”, **Then** no duplicate run is started and I am directed to view the active run/report.
+2. **Given** no active verification run exists (including when the most recent run is completed or failed), **When** I click “Start verification”, **Then** a new run starts and I can view its report as it progresses.
+
+---
+
+### User Story 3 - Least-privilege and safe disclosure (Priority: P3)
+
+As a workspace member with access to the tenant scope (including read-only), I can view verification reports but cannot start verification unless I have the start capability. As a non-member, I cannot discover that a tenant or report exists.
+
+**Why this priority**: Verification data can leak operational posture; access must follow least-privilege and “deny-as-not-found” for non-members.
+
+**Independent Test**: Validate both authorization paths: read-only can view but cannot start; non-member receives a not-found response for all tenant-scoped verification routes.
+
+**Acceptance Scenarios**:
+
+1. **Given** I am a workspace member without the “start verification” capability, **When** I open the verification page, **Then** I can view past reports but the “Start verification” action is disabled and cannot be executed.
+2. **Given** I am not a member of the workspace/tenant scope, **When** I attempt to access the verification report route, **Then** I receive a not-found response with no identifying hints.
+
+---
+
+### Edge Cases
+
+- Report missing or malformed (e.g., run exists but report is absent or partial) → viewer shows a safe “Report unavailable” state and guidance.
+- Unknown check keys or unknown reason codes (newer schema written by a newer verifier) → viewer degrades gracefully, still showing status/message/next steps when present.
+- Large reports (near upper bound, e.g., 50 checks) → viewer remains responsive and summary counts remain correct.
+- A run transitions from running → complete while the user is viewing → the viewer refreshes safely or the user can re-open without inconsistent states.
+- Evidence contains unexpected fields → redaction rules prevent sensitive values from being displayed.
+
+## Out of Scope
+
+- Introducing a separate monitoring/observability platform beyond the existing run tracking and audit log.
+- Any workflow that requires client-side handling of secrets.
+- A full overhaul of onboarding wizards beyond replacing/embedding verification status with the checklist viewer.
+- Provider job orchestration redesign unrelated to running verification checks.
+- Server-side actions triggered directly from the checklist viewer (v1 is navigation-only).
+
+## Requirements *(mandatory)*
+
+**Constitution alignment (required):** If this feature introduces any external provider calls, any write/change behavior,
+or any long-running/background work, the spec MUST describe safety gates (preview/confirmation/audit), tenant isolation,
+run observability (run identity, visibility, and outcomes), and tests. If security-relevant DB-only actions intentionally
+skip run tracking, the spec MUST describe the audit log entries.
+
+**Constitution alignment (RBAC-UX):** If this feature introduces or changes authorization behavior, the spec MUST:
+- state which authorization plane(s) are involved (tenant-scoped admin area vs platform/system admin area),
+- ensure any cross-plane access is deny-as-not-found (404),
+- explicitly define 404 vs 403 semantics:
+  - non-member / not entitled to tenant scope → 404 (deny-as-not-found)
+  - member but missing capability → 403
+- describe how authorization is enforced server-side (Gates/Policies) for every mutation/operation-start/credential change,
+- reference the canonical capability registry (no raw capability strings; no role-string checks in feature code),
+- ensure global search is tenant-scoped and non-member-safe (no hints; inaccessible results treated as 404 semantics),
+- ensure destructive-like actions require explicit user confirmation,
+- include at least one positive and one negative authorization test, and note any RBAC regression tests added/updated.
+
+**Constitution alignment (OPS-EX-AUTH-001):** OIDC/SAML login handshakes may perform synchronous outbound HTTP (e.g., token exchange)
+on `/auth/*` endpoints without an `OperationRun`. This MUST NOT be used for Monitoring/Operations pages.
+
+**Constitution alignment (BADGE-001):** If this feature changes status-like badges (status/outcome/severity/risk/availability/boolean),
+the spec MUST describe how badge semantics stay centralized (no ad-hoc mappings) and which tests cover any new/changed values.
+
+### Functional Requirements
+
+- **FR-001 — Canonical verification report contract**: The system MUST generate a versioned “Verification Report” document for each verification run, including: schema version, flow identifier, identity/scope, generated timestamp, summary counts, and a list of check results.
+
+- **FR-002 — Check result contract**: Each check result MUST include: stable key, title, status (pass/fail/warn/skip/running), severity (info/low/medium/high/critical), blocking flag, reason code, human-readable message, safe evidence pointers, and one or more “next steps” actions (where applicable).
+
+  Evidence MUST be strictly limited to structured safe pointers (internal IDs, masked strings, hashes) and MUST NOT contain raw payloads, tokens, claims, headers, or full error bodies.
+
+  Next steps in v1 MUST be navigation-only (links to internal pages or external documentation) and MUST NOT trigger server-side actions.
+
+- **FR-003 — Stable reason code taxonomy**: The system MUST use stable, documented reason codes for failed/warned/skipped outcomes so that support, automation, and future UI changes remain consistent.
+
+  The taxonomy MUST include a small baseline set of cross-cutting codes and MUST reserve an `ext.*` namespace for flow-specific or check-specific extensions.
+
+- **FR-004 — DB-only viewing**: Viewing a verification checklist MUST be read-only and MUST NOT trigger any external calls (e.g., no provider API calls, no HTTP calls, no background jobs started as a side effect of rendering).
+
+- **FR-005 — Start verification creates a run**: Starting verification MUST create (or reuse, per dedupe policy) a new verification run record and begin executing the verification checks using existing background processing.
+
+- **FR-006 — Dedupe / idempotency**: If a verification run is already active for the same identity (tenant + provider connection + flow), the system MUST NOT start a duplicate active run; it MUST present a clear “already running” outcome and an affordance to view the active run/report.
+
+  If no run is active (including when the most recent run is completed or failed), “Start verification” MUST create a new run.
+
+- **FR-007 — Capability-first authorization**: Permission checks for viewing and starting verification MUST reference the canonical capability registry (no string-literal capability checks in feature code).
+
+- **FR-008 — RBAC UX semantics**: Non-members attempting to access tenant-scoped verification pages/routes MUST receive not-found responses. Members lacking the “start” capability MUST be able to view reports but MUST NOT be able to start verification (UI disabled + server-side enforcement).
+
+  Viewing reports MUST NOT require the start capability.
+
+- **FR-009 — Standardized UI semantics**: The viewer MUST render consistent status labels, a summary banner (e.g., Ready / Needs attention / Blocked), and per-check expandable details with standardized “Next steps” calls-to-action.
+
+- **FR-010 — Reuse across suite**: The framework MUST be adoptable by multiple verification flows without re-implementing viewer logic, including: managed tenant onboarding verification, provider connection verification, RBAC setup verification, consent & permission verification, and future readiness/health checks.
+
+- **FR-011 — Auditing**: Starting and completing verification MUST emit audit events with stable action identifiers and redaction rules, recording minimal metadata (workspace/tenant identifiers, run identifier, and result counts).
+
+### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
+
+- **Verification Flow**: A named verification context (e.g., managed tenant onboarding) that defines which checks run.
+- **Verification Identity (Scope)**: The set of identifiers that uniquely represent “what is being verified” (tenant + provider connection + flow).
+- **Verification Run**: A single execution attempt for a given identity that produces a report (and is auditable).
+- **Verification Report**: A versioned, structured document attached to a run, containing summary and check results.
+- **Check Definition**: A reusable definition of an atomic readiness check (key, title, expected preconditions, severity, blocking behavior).
+- **Check Result**: The outcome of executing a check within a report.
+- **Reason Code**: A stable, machine-readable classification of why a check is pass/fail/warn/skip.
+- **Next Step**: An actionable remediation hint (label + optional destination/action) that helps the operator resolve a failed check.
+- **Evidence Pointer**: Safe references that support diagnostics (IDs, masked strings, hashes), without exposing secrets.
+
+### Assumptions
+
+- A run-tracking mechanism already exists and can store an attached, versioned verification report per run.
+- A canonical capability registry exists and is the source of truth for permission checks.
+- An audit logging mechanism exists that can record start/complete events with redaction.
+- Verification execution uses existing background processing patterns (no new observability platform is introduced).
+
+### Dependencies
+
+- Workspace membership and tenant-scoped authorization boundaries are already modeled.
+- Run visibility rules support “deny-as-not-found” behavior for non-members.
+- UI surfaces exist (or can be added) where “Next steps” can route users for remediation.
+
+## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
+
+### Measurable Outcomes
+
+- **SC-001 (Clarity)**: In a usability test with a pre-seeded failed report, 90% of operators can identify the top blocking failure and the recommended next step within 60 seconds.
+- **SC-002 (Determinism)**: When “Start verification” is triggered repeatedly for the same identity while a run is active, the system starts at most 1 active run (0 duplicates) and always provides a path to view the active run.
+- **SC-003 (Safety / data minimization)**: Verification reports contain no secrets or tokens; evidence is limited to safe pointers (validated by automated tests and/or static checks).
+- **SC-004 (Performance)**: The verification report viewer renders within 200ms server time for a typical report of up to 50 checks.
+- **SC-005 (Authorization)**: Non-member access to tenant-scoped verification pages results in not-found responses in 100% of tested cases; members without the start capability cannot execute start actions in 100% of tested cases.

specs/074-verification-checklist/tasks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+# Tasks: 074 Verification Checklist Framework
+
+**Input**: Design documents from `/specs/074-verification-checklist/`
+**Prerequisites**: plan.md (required), spec.md (required for user stories), research.md, data-model.md, contracts/
+
+**Tests**: Required (Pest).
+
+---
+
+## Phase 1: Foundational (Blocking Prerequisites)
+
+- [x] T001 [US1] Add example reports under specs: `specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/*.json` (pass/fail/warn/running) aligned to `contracts/verification-report.schema.json`.
+- [x] T002 [P] [US1] Add a small schema validation helper for reports (pure PHP, no external deps) in `app/Support/Verification/VerificationReportSchema.php` (version parsing + shape validation + graceful fallback).
+- [x] T003 [P] [US1] Add report redaction/sanitization utility in `app/Support/Verification/VerificationReportSanitizer.php` (denylist keys/values; enforce evidence pointers only).
+- [x] T004 [US1] Add value objects (or typed arrays) for report/check concepts in `app/Support/Verification/*` (status/severity enums or constants) to avoid ad-hoc strings throughout UI.
+
+**RBAC & UX prereqs**
+
+- [x] T005 [US3] Decide and document the start capability used per verification flow (v1: use `Capabilities::PROVIDER_RUN` for `provider.connection.check`; prefer existing constants in `app/Support/Auth/Capabilities.php`).
+- [x] T006 [US3] Add/confirm central UI enforcement helper usage for “visible-but-disabled with tooltip” in verification start UI (use tenant-scoped `app/Support/Rbac/UiEnforcement.php` with a resolved `Tenant` record).
+
+**Badges (BADGE-001)**
+
+- [x] T007 [P] [US1] Add badge domains for verification status/severity in `app/Support/Badges/BadgeDomain.php`.
+- [x] T008 [P] [US1] Add domain mappers in `app/Support/Badges/Domains/*` (e.g., `VerificationCheckStatusBadge`, `VerificationCheckSeverityBadge`).
+- [x] T009 [US1] Register domains in `app/Support/Badges/BadgeCatalog.php`.
+- [x] T010 [US1] Add mapping tests for new badge domains in `tests/Unit/Badges/*`.
+
+**Checkpoint**: Report contract + sanitizer + badge domains exist; UI work can start.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 2: User Story 1 — Operator sees what’s wrong (Priority: P1)
+
+**Goal**: Render a structured, DB-only verification report viewer for a run.
+
+**Independent Test**: Seed an `OperationRun` with `context.verification_report` and assert the viewer renders the correct summary + per-check details, with no outbound HTTP.
+
+### Tests (write first)
+
+- [x] T011 [US1] Add a viewer DB-only test (no outbound HTTP, no job dispatch) in `tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationReportViewerDbOnlyTest.php` using `Http::fake()` + `Bus::fake()` and asserting no requests / no dispatch during page render (including a second render to cover Livewire refresh/poll paths).
+- [x] T012 [US1] Add a redaction test in `tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationReportRedactionTest.php` to ensure forbidden keys/values never appear in stored/rendered evidence.
+- [x] T013 [US1] Add a “malformed/missing report” viewer test in `tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationReportMissingOrMalformedTest.php` (safe empty state).
+
+### Implementation
+
+- [x] T014 [US1] Create a reusable viewer Blade partial in `resources/views/filament/components/verification-report-viewer.blade.php` (summary banner + counts + collapsible checks + next steps links-only).
+- [x] T015 [US1] Create a Filament view entry/helper to render the viewer from an `OperationRun` in `app/Filament/Support/VerificationReportViewer.php` (or existing Filament helpers location), using only DB values.
+- [x] T016 [US1] Integrate viewer into Monitoring → Operations run view page: update `app/Filament/Resources/OperationRunResource.php` (infolist) to show the verification report section when `context.verification_report` exists.
+
+**Checkpoint**: A seeded report is readable in Monitoring; viewer is DB-only.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 3: User Story 2 — Deterministic starts (Priority: P2)
+
+**Goal**: Starting verification is idempotent while active (dedupe) and guides users to the active run.
+
+**Independent Test**: Start verification twice for the same identity and assert a single active run is used.
+
+### Tests
+
+- [x] T017 [US2] Add a dedupe regression test in `tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationStartDedupeTest.php` asserting repeated starts reuse the same active run (leveraging the existing `OperationRunService::ensureRunWithIdentity()` behavior).
+- [x] T018 [US2] Add a “new run after completion” test in `tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationStartAfterCompletionTest.php`.
+
+### Implementation
+
+- [x] T019 [US2] Add (or adapt) a small “start verification” service wrapper in `app/Services/Verification/StartVerification.php` that: authorizes, creates/reuses a run identity, enqueues a verifier job, and returns the run.
+- [x] T020 [US2] Update the managed tenant onboarding verification step to route through the shared starter and replace the binary status UI with the shared verification report viewer (or a safe empty state) in `app/Filament/Pages/Workspaces/ManagedTenantOnboardingWizard.php`.
+- [x] T021 [US2] Update provider connection verification start surface(s) (where present) to route through the same shared starter.
+
+**Checkpoint**: Starts are deterministic and route users to the active run.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 4: User Story 3 — Least-privilege and safe disclosure (Priority: P3)
+
+**Goal**: View vs start capability split; non-members get 404; members lacking start capability get 403 on execution.
+
+**Independent Test**: Readonly member can view report but cannot start; non-member cannot discover tenant/run.
+
+### Tests
+
+- [x] T022 [US3] Add authorization tests for view vs start in `tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationAuthorizationTest.php` covering:
+  - tenant non-member → 404 on view + start
+  - tenant member without start capability → can view, start returns forbidden (403)
+  - tenant member with start capability → can start
+
+### Implementation
+
+- [x] T023 [US3] Ensure start actions enforce server-side authorization via Gate/Policy (no UI-only enforcement) and use capability constants from `app/Support/Auth/Capabilities.php`.
+- [x] T024 [US3] Ensure tenant-scope non-membership yields deny-as-not-found behavior for verification routes/actions (align with existing tenant routing patterns and helpers).
+
+**Checkpoint**: Authorization behavior matches RBAC-UX contract.
+
+---
+
+## Phase 5: Audit & Completion Events (Cross-cutting)
+
+- [x] T025 [US1] Add a stable audit action ID for verification completion in `app/Support/Audit/AuditActionId.php`.
+- [x] T026 [US1] Emit a completion audit event when a verification run finalizes (where run completion is set) using `app/Services/Audit/WorkspaceAuditLogger.php` with redacted metadata (run id + counts only).
+- [x] T030 [US1] Add a report writer in `app/Support/Verification/VerificationReportWriter.php` that builds `context.verification_report`, derives `summary.overall` deterministically, enforces reason codes + evidence pointer-only policy, and runs sanitizer before persistence.
+- [x] T031 [US1] Integrate the report writer into `app/Jobs/ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob.php` so `provider.connection.check` writes a compliant `verification_report` to the run (both success and failure paths) before marking the run completed.
+- [x] T032 [US1] Add a report-writing integration test in `tests/Feature/Verification/ProviderConnectionHealthCheckWritesReportTest.php` ensuring the run ends with a valid, sanitized `context.verification_report` (and no forbidden evidence fields).
+
+---
+
+## Phase 6: Polish & Regression Guards
+
+- [x] T027 [P] Add UI polish for empty/missing report state in the viewer (no leaks of internal details).
+- [x] T028 Run formatting: `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty`.
+- [x] T029 Run targeted tests: `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Verification`.
+
+---
+
+## Dependencies & Execution Order
+
+- Phase 1 (Foundational) blocks all other phases.
+- US1 can start after Phase 1; US2/US3 can proceed after Phase 1 but should reuse US1 primitives (viewer + sanitizer + badges).
+- Audit completion (Phase 5) depends on the shared verification job/service that finalizes runs.

tests/Feature/Verification/ProviderConnectionHealthCheckWritesReportTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Jobs\ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob;
+use App\Models\AuditLog;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
+use App\Models\ProviderCredential;
+use App\Services\Graph\GraphClientInterface;
+use App\Services\Graph\GraphResponse;
+use App\Services\OperationRunService;
+use App\Services\Providers\MicrosoftProviderHealthCheck;
+use App\Support\Audit\AuditActionId;
+use App\Support\Verification\VerificationReportSchema;
+
+it('writes a sanitized verification report for failed provider connection checks', function (): void {
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+
+    $connection = ProviderConnection::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'provider' => 'microsoft',
+        'entra_tenant_id' => fake()->uuid(),
+    ]);
+
+    ProviderCredential::factory()->create([
+        'provider_connection_id' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+        'payload' => [
+            'tenant_id' => (string) $connection->entra_tenant_id,
+            'client_id' => fake()->uuid(),
+            'client_secret' => fake()->sha1(),
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'user_id' => (int) $user->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'running',
+        'outcome' => 'pending',
+        'context' => [
+            'provider_connection_id' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    $this->mock(GraphClientInterface::class, function ($mock): void {
+        $mock->shouldReceive('getOrganization')
+            ->once()
+            ->andReturn(new GraphResponse(false, [], 401, ['Bearer super-secret-token']));
+    });
+
+    $job = new ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob(
+        tenantId: (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        userId: (int) $user->getKey(),
+        providerConnectionId: (int) $connection->getKey(),
+        operationRun: $run,
+    );
+
+    $job->handle(
+        healthCheck: app(MicrosoftProviderHealthCheck::class),
+        runs: app(OperationRunService::class),
+    );
+
+    $run = $run->fresh();
+
+    expect($run)->not->toBeNull();
+    expect($run->status)->toBe('completed');
+    expect($run->outcome)->toBe('failed');
+
+    $context = is_array($run->context) ? $run->context : [];
+    $report = $context['verification_report'] ?? null;
+
+    expect($report)->toBeArray();
+    expect(VerificationReportSchema::isValidReport($report))->toBeTrue();
+    expect(json_encode($report))->not->toContain('Bearer ');
+    expect($report['checks'][0]['reason_code'] ?? null)->toBe('authentication_failed');
+
+    foreach (($report['checks'] ?? []) as $check) {
+        expect($check)->toBeArray();
+
+        foreach (($check['evidence'] ?? []) as $pointer) {
+            expect($pointer)->toBeArray();
+            expect(array_keys($pointer))->toEqualCanonicalizing(['kind', 'value']);
+        }
+    }
+
+    $audit = AuditLog::query()
+        ->where('workspace_id', (int) $tenant->workspace_id)
+        ->where('action', AuditActionId::VerificationCompleted->value)
+        ->latest('id')
+        ->first();
+
+    expect($audit)->not->toBeNull();
+    expect($audit?->metadata)->toMatchArray([
+        'operation_run_id' => (int) $run->getKey(),
+    ]);
+});
+
+it('writes a verification report for successful provider connection checks', function (): void {
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+
+    $connection = ProviderConnection::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'provider' => 'microsoft',
+        'entra_tenant_id' => fake()->uuid(),
+    ]);
+
+    ProviderCredential::factory()->create([
+        'provider_connection_id' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+        'payload' => [
+            'tenant_id' => (string) $connection->entra_tenant_id,
+            'client_id' => fake()->uuid(),
+            'client_secret' => fake()->sha1(),
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'user_id' => (int) $user->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'running',
+        'outcome' => 'pending',
+        'context' => [
+            'provider_connection_id' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    $this->mock(GraphClientInterface::class, function ($mock): void {
+        $mock->shouldReceive('getOrganization')
+            ->once()
+            ->andReturn(new GraphResponse(true, [
+                'id' => 'org_123',
+                'displayName' => 'Org 123',
+            ], 200));
+    });
+
+    $job = new ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob(
+        tenantId: (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        userId: (int) $user->getKey(),
+        providerConnectionId: (int) $connection->getKey(),
+        operationRun: $run,
+    );
+
+    $job->handle(
+        healthCheck: app(MicrosoftProviderHealthCheck::class),
+        runs: app(OperationRunService::class),
+    );
+
+    $run = $run->fresh();
+
+    expect($run)->not->toBeNull();
+    expect($run->status)->toBe('completed');
+    expect($run->outcome)->toBe('succeeded');
+
+    $context = is_array($run->context) ? $run->context : [];
+    $report = $context['verification_report'] ?? null;
+
+    expect($report)->toBeArray();
+    expect(VerificationReportSchema::isValidReport($report))->toBeTrue();
+    expect($report['summary']['counts'] ?? [])->toMatchArray([
+        'total' => 1,
+        'pass' => 1,
+        'fail' => 0,
+    ]);
+});

tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationAuthorizationTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Filament\Resources\OperationRunResource;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
+use App\Models\Tenant;
+use App\Services\Verification\StartVerification;
+use Illuminate\Auth\Access\AuthorizationException;
+use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Queue;
+use Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\Exception\NotFoundHttpException;
+
+it('returns 404 for non-members on verification view and start', function (): void {
+    Queue::fake();
+
+    $tenant = Tenant::factory()->create();
+    $otherTenant = Tenant::factory()->create();
+
+    [$user] = createUserWithTenant($otherTenant, role: 'readonly');
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'completed',
+        'outcome' => 'failed',
+        'context' => [
+            'verification_report' => json_decode(
+                (string) file_get_contents(base_path('specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/fail.json')),
+                true,
+                512,
+                JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR,
+            ),
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    $this->actingAs($user)
+        ->get(OperationRunResource::getUrl('view', ['record' => $run], tenant: $tenant))
+        ->assertStatus(404);
+
+    $connection = ProviderConnection::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+    ]);
+
+    expect(fn () => app(StartVerification::class)->providerConnectionCheck(
+        tenant: $tenant,
+        connection: $connection,
+        initiator: $user,
+    ))->toThrow(NotFoundHttpException::class);
+});
+
+it('allows readonly members to view verification reports but forbids starting verification', function (): void {
+    Queue::fake();
+
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'readonly');
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'user_id' => (int) $user->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'completed',
+        'outcome' => 'failed',
+        'context' => [
+            'verification_report' => json_decode(
+                (string) file_get_contents(base_path('specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/fail.json')),
+                true,
+                512,
+                JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR,
+            ),
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    $this->actingAs($user)
+        ->get(OperationRunResource::getUrl('view', ['record' => $run], tenant: $tenant))
+        ->assertOk()
+        ->assertSee('Verification report');
+
+    $connection = ProviderConnection::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+    ]);
+
+    expect(fn () => app(StartVerification::class)->providerConnectionCheck(
+        tenant: $tenant,
+        connection: $connection,
+        initiator: $user,
+    ))->toThrow(AuthorizationException::class);
+});
+
+it('allows members with start capability to start verification', function (): void {
+    Queue::fake();
+
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+
+    $connection = ProviderConnection::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'provider' => 'microsoft',
+        'entra_tenant_id' => fake()->uuid(),
+    ]);
+
+    $result = app(StartVerification::class)->providerConnectionCheck(
+        tenant: $tenant,
+        connection: $connection,
+        initiator: $user,
+    );
+
+    expect($result->status)->toBe('started');
+    expect($result->run->type)->toBe('provider.connection.check');
+    expect($result->run->tenant_id)->toBe((int) $tenant->getKey());
+    expect($result->run->context)->toMatchArray([
+        'provider_connection_id' => (int) $connection->getKey(),
+    ]);
+});

tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationReportMissingOrMalformedTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Filament\Resources\OperationRunResource\Pages\ViewOperationRun;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use Filament\Facades\Filament;
+use Livewire\Livewire;
+
+it('shows a safe empty state when a verification report is missing', function (): void {
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+    $this->actingAs($user);
+
+    $tenant->makeCurrent();
+    Filament::setTenant($tenant, true);
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'user_id' => (int) $user->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'completed',
+        'outcome' => 'failed',
+        'context' => [],
+    ]);
+
+    assertNoOutboundHttp(function () use ($run): void {
+        Livewire::test(ViewOperationRun::class, ['record' => $run->getRouteKey()])
+            ->assertSee('Verification report')
+            ->assertSee('Verification report unavailable');
+    });
+});
+
+it('shows a safe empty state when a verification report is malformed', function (): void {
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+    $this->actingAs($user);
+
+    $tenant->makeCurrent();
+    Filament::setTenant($tenant, true);
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'user_id' => (int) $user->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'completed',
+        'outcome' => 'failed',
+        'context' => [
+            'verification_report' => [
+                'schema_version' => '1.0.0',
+                'flow' => 'provider.connection.check',
+            ],
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    assertNoOutboundHttp(function () use ($run): void {
+        Livewire::test(ViewOperationRun::class, ['record' => $run->getRouteKey()])
+            ->assertSee('Verification report')
+            ->assertSee('Verification report unavailable');
+    });
+});

tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationReportRedactionTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Filament\Resources\OperationRunResource\Pages\ViewOperationRun;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use Filament\Facades\Filament;
+use Livewire\Livewire;
+
+it('redacts forbidden evidence fields in rendered verification reports', function (): void {
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+    $this->actingAs($user);
+
+    $tenant->makeCurrent();
+    Filament::setTenant($tenant, true);
+
+    $report = json_decode(
+        (string) file_get_contents(base_path('specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/fail.json')),
+        true,
+        512,
+        JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR,
+    );
+
+    $report['checks'][0]['evidence'][] = ['kind' => 'authorization', 'value' => 'Bearer abc.def.ghi'];
+    $report['checks'][0]['evidence'][] = ['kind' => 'access_token', 'value' => 'super-secret'];
+    $report['checks'][0]['message'] = 'Authorization: Bearer abc.def.ghi access_token=super-secret';
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'user_id' => (int) $user->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'completed',
+        'outcome' => 'failed',
+        'context' => [
+            'verification_report' => $report,
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    assertNoOutboundHttp(function () use ($run): void {
+        Livewire::test(ViewOperationRun::class, ['record' => $run->getRouteKey()])
+            ->assertSee('Verification report')
+            ->assertSee('Token acquisition works')
+            ->assertDontSee('access_token')
+            ->assertDontSee('Bearer abc.def.ghi')
+            ->assertDontSee('super-secret');
+    });
+});

tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationReportViewerDbOnlyTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Filament\Resources\OperationRunResource\Pages\ViewOperationRun;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use Filament\Facades\Filament;
+use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Bus;
+use Livewire\Livewire;
+
+it('renders the verification report viewer DB-only (no outbound HTTP, no job dispatch)', function (): void {
+    Bus::fake();
+
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+    $this->actingAs($user);
+
+    $tenant->makeCurrent();
+    Filament::setTenant($tenant, true);
+
+    $report = json_decode(
+        (string) file_get_contents(base_path('specs/074-verification-checklist/contracts/examples/fail.json')),
+        true,
+        512,
+        JSON_THROW_ON_ERROR,
+    );
+
+    $run = OperationRun::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => (int) $tenant->getKey(),
+        'user_id' => (int) $user->getKey(),
+        'type' => 'provider.connection.check',
+        'status' => 'completed',
+        'outcome' => 'failed',
+        'context' => [
+            'verification_report' => $report,
+        ],
+    ]);
+
+    assertNoOutboundHttp(function () use ($run): void {
+        $component = Livewire::test(ViewOperationRun::class, ['record' => $run->getRouteKey()])
+            ->assertSee('Verification report')
+            ->assertSee('Blocked')
+            ->assertSee('Token acquisition works');
+
+        $component
+            ->call('$refresh')
+            ->assertSee('Token acquisition works');
+    });
+
+    Bus::assertNothingDispatched();
+});

tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationStartAfterCompletionTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Jobs\ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
+use App\Services\OperationRunService;
+use App\Services\Verification\StartVerification;
+use App\Support\OperationRunOutcome;
+use App\Support\OperationRunStatus;
+use Filament\Facades\Filament;
+use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Queue;
+
+it('creates a new verification run after the previous run is completed', function (): void {
+    Queue::fake();
+
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+    $this->actingAs($user);
+
+    $tenant->makeCurrent();
+    Filament::setTenant($tenant, true);
+
+    $connection = ProviderConnection::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => $tenant->getKey(),
+        'provider' => 'microsoft',
+        'entra_tenant_id' => fake()->uuid(),
+    ]);
+
+    $starter = app(StartVerification::class);
+
+    $first = $starter->providerConnectionCheck(
+        tenant: $tenant,
+        connection: $connection,
+        initiator: $user,
+    );
+
+    /** @var OperationRun $firstRun */
+    $firstRun = $first->run->refresh();
+
+    app(OperationRunService::class)->updateRun(
+        $firstRun,
+        status: OperationRunStatus::Completed->value,
+        outcome: OperationRunOutcome::Succeeded->value,
+    );
+
+    $second = $starter->providerConnectionCheck(
+        tenant: $tenant,
+        connection: $connection,
+        initiator: $user,
+    );
+
+    expect($second->status)->toBe('started');
+    expect($second->run->getKey())->not->toBe($firstRun->getKey());
+
+    expect(OperationRun::query()
+        ->where('tenant_id', $tenant->getKey())
+        ->where('type', 'provider.connection.check')
+        ->count())->toBe(2);
+
+    Queue::assertPushed(ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob::class, 2);
+});

tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationStartDedupeTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Jobs\ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob;
+use App\Models\OperationRun;
+use App\Models\ProviderConnection;
+use App\Services\Verification\StartVerification;
+use Filament\Facades\Filament;
+use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Queue;
+
+it('dedupes verification starts while a run is active', function (): void {
+    Queue::fake();
+
+    [$user, $tenant] = createUserWithTenant(role: 'operator');
+    $this->actingAs($user);
+
+    $tenant->makeCurrent();
+    Filament::setTenant($tenant, true);
+
+    $connection = ProviderConnection::factory()->create([
+        'tenant_id' => $tenant->getKey(),
+        'provider' => 'microsoft',
+        'entra_tenant_id' => fake()->uuid(),
+    ]);
+
+    $starter = app(StartVerification::class);
+
+    $first = $starter->providerConnectionCheck(
+        tenant: $tenant,
+        connection: $connection,
+        initiator: $user,
+        extraContext: ['wizard' => ['flow' => 'managed_tenant_onboarding']],
+    );
+
+    $second = $starter->providerConnectionCheck(
+        tenant: $tenant,
+        connection: $connection,
+        initiator: $user,
+        extraContext: ['wizard' => ['flow' => 'managed_tenant_onboarding']],
+    );
+
+    expect($first->run->getKey())->toBe($second->run->getKey());
+    expect($first->status)->toBe('started');
+    expect($second->status)->toBe('deduped');
+
+    expect(OperationRun::query()
+        ->where('tenant_id', $tenant->getKey())
+        ->where('type', 'provider.connection.check')
+        ->count())->toBe(1);
+
+    Queue::assertPushed(ProviderConnectionHealthCheckJob::class, 1);
+});

tests/Unit/Badges/VerificationBadgesTest.php

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+<?php
+
+declare(strict_types=1);
+
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeCatalog;
+use App\Support\Badges\BadgeDomain;
+
+it('maps verification check status values to canonical badge semantics', function (): void {
+    $pass = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckStatus, 'pass');
+    expect($pass->label)->toBe('Pass');
+    expect($pass->color)->toBe('success');
+
+    $fail = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckStatus, 'fail');
+    expect($fail->label)->toBe('Fail');
+    expect($fail->color)->toBe('danger');
+
+    $warn = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckStatus, 'warn');
+    expect($warn->label)->toBe('Warn');
+    expect($warn->color)->toBe('warning');
+
+    $skip = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckStatus, 'skip');
+    expect($skip->label)->toBe('Skipped');
+    expect($skip->color)->toBe('gray');
+
+    $running = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckStatus, 'running');
+    expect($running->label)->toBe('Running');
+    expect($running->color)->toBe('info');
+});
+
+it('maps verification check severity values to canonical badge semantics', function (): void {
+    $info = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckSeverity, 'info');
+    expect($info->label)->toBe('Info');
+    expect($info->color)->toBe('gray');
+
+    $low = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckSeverity, 'low');
+    expect($low->label)->toBe('Low');
+    expect($low->color)->toBe('info');
+
+    $medium = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckSeverity, 'medium');
+    expect($medium->label)->toBe('Medium');
+    expect($medium->color)->toBe('warning');
+
+    $high = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckSeverity, 'high');
+    expect($high->label)->toBe('High');
+    expect($high->color)->toBe('danger');
+
+    $critical = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationCheckSeverity, 'critical');
+    expect($critical->label)->toBe('Critical');
+    expect($critical->color)->toBe('danger');
+});
+
+it('maps verification report overall values to canonical badge semantics', function (): void {
+    $ready = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationReportOverall, 'ready');
+    expect($ready->label)->toBe('Ready');
+    expect($ready->color)->toBe('success');
+
+    $needsAttention = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationReportOverall, 'needs_attention');
+    expect($needsAttention->label)->toBe('Needs attention');
+    expect($needsAttention->color)->toBe('warning');
+
+    $blocked = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationReportOverall, 'blocked');
+    expect($blocked->label)->toBe('Blocked');
+    expect($blocked->color)->toBe('danger');
+
+    $running = BadgeCatalog::spec(BadgeDomain::VerificationReportOverall, 'running');
+    expect($running->label)->toBe('Running');
+    expect($running->color)->toBe('info');
+});