# Specification Quality Checklist: Remove Findings Lifecycle Backfill Runtime Surfaces **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning **Created**: 2026-04-28 **Feature**: specs/253-remove-findings-backfill-runtime-surfaces/spec.md ## Content Quality - [x] No language/framework/API design leakage; concrete repo surfaces, commands, and labels are named only because this cleanup deletes those exact shipped traces. - [x] Focused on user value and business needs - [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders - [x] All mandatory sections completed ## Requirement Completeness - [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain - [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous - [x] Success criteria are measurable - [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) - [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined - [x] Edge cases are identified - [x] Scope is clearly bounded - [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified ## Feature Readiness - [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria - [x] User scenarios cover primary flows - [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria - [x] No unintended implementation design leakage remains beyond the explicit cleanup special-case for named repo-visible traces ## Test Governance Review - [x] Lane fit is explicit: the package uses `fast-feedback` and `confidence`, plus one retained `heavy-governance` guard in `apps/platform/tests/Feature/OperationalControls/NoAdHocOperationalControlBypassTest.php` so operational-control bypass residue cannot survive the cleanup silently. - [x] No new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced; the retained guard stays explicit, bounded, and tied to operational-control source-trace removal only. - [x] Suite-cost outcome is net-negative: backfill-only tests, lane traces, and helper residue are removed in the same slice instead of widening shared defaults. ## Review Outcome - [x] Review outcome class: `acceptable-special-case` - [x] Workflow outcome: `keep` - [x] Review-note location is explicit: the heavy-governance retention note lives in `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, and the final preparation report. ## Notes - The spec intentionally names concrete routes, commands, labels, and catalog keys because the product value of this slice is the removal of those specific repo-visible runtime surfaces. - The slice stays small by deleting visible repair tooling only; acknowledged-status cleanup and creation-time invariant hardening remain explicit follow-up candidates. - Validation pass complete: no clarification markers remain, LEAN-001 cleanup posture is explicit, and tenant-owned findings continue to treat `workspace_id` plus `tenant_id` as required anchors.