# Quickstart: Full Suite Failure Classification & CI Lane Baseline ## Purpose Use this package to classify whether the complete platform test suite is a reliable CI signal after Specs `293` and `294`. ## Before Implementation 1. Review: - `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/wt-plattform/specs/295-full-suite-ci-baseline/spec.md` - `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/wt-plattform/specs/295-full-suite-ci-baseline/plan.md` - `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/wt-plattform/specs/295-full-suite-ci-baseline/data-model.md` - `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/wt-plattform/specs/295-full-suite-ci-baseline/failure-classification.md` 2. Confirm the branch is clean. 3. Confirm no implementation step is about restoring TenantPanelProvider, `/admin/t/...`, or tenant-scoped legacy fallbacks. ## Primary Classification Flow Use only the pinned categories and seams from `failure-classification.md`: `ci-signal-restored`, `ci-wrapper-or-manifest-regression`, `artifact-publication-regression`, `budget-or-trend-baseline-drift`, `product-runtime-or-test-regression`, `browser-lane-regression`, `flaky-or-environment`, `follow-up-spec-required`, `resolved-or-not-needed`; and `raw-full-suite`, `fast-feedback-lane`, `confidence-lane`, `heavy-governance-lane`, `browser-lane`, `profiling-or-junit-support`, `lane-reporting`, `artifact-publication`, `budget-trend-baseline`, `legacy-cutover-regression-guard`, `provider-verification-regression-guard`. Run the raw full suite when feasible: ```bash export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && (cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact) ``` Record the outcome in `failure-classification.md`. If the raw full suite is too slow, noisy, or environment-blocked to classify, run the explicit lane split: ```bash export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-lane fast-feedback export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-lane confidence export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-lane heavy-governance export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-lane browser ``` ## CI Report and Artifact Flow After lane runs, generate lane reports when needed: ```bash export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-report fast-feedback export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-report confidence export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-report heavy-governance export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-report browser ``` Use artifact staging only if artifact publication itself is being validated: ```bash export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && ./scripts/platform-test-artifacts fast-feedback /tmp/tenantpilot-fast-feedback-artifacts ``` ## Fix Rules Fix in `295` only when the failure is directly and narrowly caused by: - `scripts/platform-test-lane` - `scripts/platform-test-report` - `scripts/platform-test-artifacts` - `apps/platform/tests/Support/TestLaneManifest.php` - `apps/platform/tests/Support/TestLaneReport.php` - `apps/platform/tests/Support/TestLaneBudget.php` - directly related CI guard tests under `apps/platform/tests/Feature/Guards/` Do not fix in `295` when the failure requires: - application runtime behavior changes - Filament page/resource changes - routes, middleware, policies, services, jobs, migrations, views, or models - provider/verification runtime changes beyond the completed Spec `294` - browser UI repair - tenant-cutover compatibility restoration Classify those as follow-up work instead. ## Expected Close-Out Close out with exactly one final readiness decision: - `restored-ci-signal` - `classified-follow-up-required` - `blocked-by-environment` Then run formatting for any changed PHP files: ```bash export PATH="/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH" && (cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent) ```