# Platform Readiness Report — Spec 345

**Branch**: `345-platform-productization-readiness-roadmap-reconciliation-gate`  
**Date**: 2026-06-02  

## Readiness Table

| Area | Current state | Readiness state (1–6) | Evidence (repo paths) | Blockers | Recommended action | Next spec? |
|---|---|---:|---|---|---|---|
| Workspace/Environment Shell | Workspace hubs vs environment-bound pages are stable, route-owned, and recently browser-verified. | 1 | `specs/338-workspace-environment-resource-scope-contract/spec.md`; `specs/340-post-scope-contract-browser-verification-gate/audit-report.md`; `specs/341-canonical-link-query-cleanup/spec.md`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-001-workspace-overview.md`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-002-environment-dashboard.md` | No structural blocker found; only minor helper-copy follow-up (`B-340-001`) remains. | Keep the shell frozen; do not reopen scope/navigation unless fresh regression evidence appears. | No |
| Customer Review Workspace | Customer-safe review consumption, acknowledgement, accepted-risk visibility, and density hierarchy are repo-real and heavily covered. | 1 | `specs/312-customer-review-workspace-v1-completion/spec.md`; `specs/342-customer-review-workspace-final-consumption-productization/spec.md`; `specs/343-customer-review-attestation-accepted-risk-lifecycle/spec.md`; `specs/344-customer-review-workspace-density-audience-polish/spec.md`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec342CustomerReviewWorkspaceConsumptionSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec343CustomerReviewAttestationAcceptedRiskSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec344CustomerReviewWorkspaceDensitySmokeTest.php`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-006-customer-review-workspace.md` | Residual wording/localization QA may still surface in operator use, but the lane is no longer a platform-critical missing feature. | Treat this lane as closed for now; only reopen for narrow polish proven by operator feedback. | No |
| Evidence / Review Packs | Evidence overview, review-pack generation, download, and customer-safe linkage are strong, but retained-artifact lifecycle and stored-report clarity remain less mature. | 2 | `specs/329-evidence-audit-log-disclosure-productization/spec.md`; `specs/337-evidence-review-pack-product-process-flow-alignment/spec.md`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Monitoring/EvidenceOverview.php`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Resources/ReviewPackResource.php`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Resources/StoredReportResource.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Feature/Monitoring/Spec329EvidenceAuditDisclosureProductizationTest.php`; `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` | Artifact lifecycle/state truth and retained-report product clarity still lag behind review-pack flow maturity. | Keep current review/evidence flow stable and handle retained-artifact follow-through as a separate lane. | Later: `specs/267-artifact-lifecycle-retention/` if chosen |
| Governance Inbox / Decision Register | Decision register is strong and proof-linked; governance inbox still reads more like a dense admin queue than a calm operator workbench. | 2 | `specs/327-governance-inbox-decision-first-workbench-productization/spec.md`; `specs/265-decision-register-approval/spec.md`; `specs/306-decision-register-reconciliation/decision-register-reconciliation.md`; `specs/307-decision-register-evidence-operationrun-link-polish/spec.md`; `specs/308-decision-register-summary-review-pack/spec.md`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Governance/GovernanceInbox.php`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Governance/DecisionRegister.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec327GovernanceInboxProductizationSmokeTest.php`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-004-governance-inbox.md`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-005-decision-register.md` | Dominant next action, clearer queue-clearing posture, calmer evidence ordering, and downstream customer-safe wording are still open. | Make this the next platform-critical productization spec. | Yes |
| Findings / Accepted Risks | Findings queues, accepted-risk lifecycle, and review integration are repo-real and operator-usable. | 2 | `specs/343-customer-review-attestation-accepted-risk-lifecycle/spec.md`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Resources/FindingExceptionResource.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Feature/Findings/FindingExceptionWorkflowTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Feature/Findings/*`; `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-012-finding-exceptions-queue.md` | Broader retained-artifact presentation, expiry/re-review storytelling, and management summary framing still depend on later governance/artifact work. | Keep this inside governance/artifact follow-through; do not split into a new standalone program now. | Merge into governance/artifact follow-through |
| Provider Readiness / Onboarding | Provider connection scope, onboarding, and permission posture are functional and trustable, but the main surface still feels admin-heavy. | 2 | `specs/339-provider-connection-scope-hardening/spec.md`; `specs/281-provider-connection-scope/spec.md`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Resources/ProviderConnectionResource.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec281ProviderConnectionScopeSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec340PostScopeContractVerificationSmokeTest.php`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-009-provider-connections.md` | Health/permission summary, dangerous-action guidance, and calmer trust copy remain open. | Schedule as a should-do-next platform productization slice after governance workflow closure. | Later |
| Monitoring / Ops / Alerts / Audit | Operations, alerts, evidence, and audit surfaces are broad and strong; remaining gaps are semantic consistency and a few polish follow-ups, not missing foundations. | 2 | `specs/328-operations-hub-decision-first-workbench-productization/spec.md`; `specs/329-evidence-audit-log-disclosure-productization/spec.md`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec328OperationsHubProductizationSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec329EvidenceAuditDisclosureSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Monitoring/AuditLog.php`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-003-operations.md`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-008-audit-log.md`; `specs/278-cross-domain-indicator-audit/spec.md` | Cross-domain indicator semantics and some export/raw drilldown follow-ups remain open. | Defer broad change; only take bounded semantics follow-up when it becomes release pressure. | No |
| Localization / Copy | Foundation and major neutralization/customer-facing passes exist, but wording consistency is still a guardrail rather than a fully closed theme. | 2 | `specs/275-customer-facing-localization-adoption/spec.md`; `specs/286-ui-copy-ia-localization-neutralization/spec.md`; `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-006-customer-review-workspace.md`; `docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-009-provider-connections.md` | Remaining gaps are QA/polish and future external-surface wording, not a missing v1 foundation. | Keep as bounded follow-through; do not make it the next main spec. | No |
| Test / Browser Confidence | Strategic surfaces have strong targeted Feature/Browser evidence, but broad merge-readiness is not freshly proven in this docs-only gate. | 2 | `specs/340-post-scope-contract-browser-verification-gate/audit-report.md`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec327GovernanceInboxProductizationSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec342CustomerReviewWorkspaceConsumptionSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec343CustomerReviewAttestationAcceptedRiskSmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec344CustomerReviewWorkspaceDensitySmokeTest.php`; `apps/platform/tests/Feature/Monitoring/Spec329EvidenceAuditDisclosureProductizationTest.php` | No fresh full-suite run; unrelated hidden debt cannot be disproven from repo inspection alone. | Use targeted smoke/tests in the next implementation spec; do not block on a broad full-suite rerun unless regressions appear. | No |

## Sellable-Platform Blockers (P0–P3)

- **P0**
  - Governance Inbox still lacks the calm, dominant queue-clearing operator workflow expected from the central decision surface (`docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-004-governance-inbox.md`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Governance/GovernanceInbox.php`).
- **P1**
  - Provider connection/readiness surface remains trust-critical but still admin-heavy in its first-read summary (`docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/page-reports/ui-009-provider-connections.md`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Resources/ProviderConnectionResource.php`).
  - Retained-artifact lifecycle/state truth is still weaker than review-pack generation/download truth (`specs/267-artifact-lifecycle-retention/spec.md`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Resources/StoredReportResource.php`; `apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Monitoring/EvidenceOverview.php`).
  - Broad sellability claims should stay qualified because Spec 345 did not rerun the full suite (`specs/340-post-scope-contract-browser-verification-gate/audit-report.md` is targeted proof only).
- **P2**
  - Cross-domain indicator semantics still need a runtime follow-through after the docs-only audit in `specs/278-cross-domain-indicator-audit/`.
  - Residual retained-report / artifact consumption polish may still be needed even with the stored-report runtime present.
- **P3**
  - Helper naming and dead-code cleanup should happen only when fresh repo evidence proves value; they are not a release gate.

## Executive Answer (repo-truth grounded)

- **MSP/operator daily usable?**: Yes. The control plane is strong enough for daily operator use across shell, reviews, evidence, findings, provider readiness, and operations.
- **Demoable?**: Yes. The strongest demo path is now review-driven governance, evidence/review-pack outputs, and provider readiness—not a speculative customer portal.
- **Sellable (MVP)?**: Almost, but not yet cleanly repeatable as a calm MSP/operator platform.
- **Why/why not**: The platform is beyond foundation-only and is already stronger than the backlog wording implies, but one central workflow gap remains: governance decision closure on `/admin/governance/inbox`. Provider readiness trust framing and retained-artifact lifecycle clarity are the next most visible follow-through gaps. Customer portal work should remain deferred until those operator-first seams are calmer.