# Requirements Checklist: Spec 350 - Operator Resolution Guidance Framework v1

**Purpose**: Validate that Spec 350 is bounded, repo-based, constitution-aligned, and ready for a later implementation loop.  
**Created**: 2026-06-03  
**Feature**: `specs/350-operator-resolution-guidance-framework-v1/spec.md`

## Candidate Selection And Guardrail

- [x] CHK001 The package names the direct user-provided candidate source and its roadmap alignment with customer review, governance inbox, provider readiness, and environment-readiness productization.
- [x] CHK002 Completed or active related specs are treated as context only and are not reopened or normalized.
- [x] CHK003 The speculative Spec-347 follow-up number conflict is documented and handled without rewriting historical artifacts.
- [x] CHK004 The scope is narrowed to a derived contract, one required review-output adapter, and only bounded optional provider/operation adapters rather than a workflow engine or broad platform rebuild.

## Repo Truth And Architecture

- [x] CHK005 The spec and plan explicitly anchor the work to existing guidance producers: review output guidance, operation guidance, operator explanation, primary-next-step helpers, provider readiness summaries, and current strategic consumers.
- [x] CHK006 The artifacts state that any new case/action contract remains derived-only and request-scoped; no persistence is introduced.
- [x] CHK007 The plan forbids replacement-by-rewrite of `ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance`, `OperationUxPresenter`, and `OperatorExplanationPattern`.
- [x] CHK008 Optional consumers are bounded explicitly so Governance Inbox, provider readiness, and environment dashboard do not become hidden redesign scope.

## UI/Productization Coverage

- [x] CHK009 UI Surface Impact is explicit and consistent with the intended review-output-first rollout plus bounded optional consumers.
- [x] CHK010 UI/Productization Coverage reuses the existing page-report identities and target-experience briefs, and it resolves `UI-040` / `UI-077` through the current audit registry instead of inventing a new audit taxonomy.
- [x] CHK011 The spec requires one dominant issue and one dominant next action rather than equal-weight warning groups.
- [x] CHK012 Audience-aware disclosure keeps technical detail, source refs, and raw/support detail secondary.

## Testing And Validation

- [x] CHK013 Planned tests cover the shared contract, the required review-output adapter, the required review-output consumers, and one bounded browser smoke, with optional provider/operation tests only if those adapters are adopted.
- [x] CHK014 Validation commands explicitly rerun focused regressions for Specs 347 and 349, while treating Spec 346 / Governance Inbox and other non-review consumers as optional regressions only when those consumers are adopted.
- [x] CHK015 The artifacts name `pint --dirty` and `git diff --check` as final validation steps.

## Review Outcome

- [x] CHK016 Review outcome class: `documentation-required-exception`
- [x] CHK017 Workflow outcome: `keep`
- [x] CHK018 Final note location is the active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`.

## Notes

- This checklist validates preparation readiness only. No application implementation has been performed.
- The documented exception is the new cross-domain contract itself; it is acceptable only because the spec keeps the implementation derived-only, review-output-first, and bounded to real current consumers.