# Requirements Checklist: Spec 358 - OperationRun Queue Truth Foundation

**Purpose**: Preparation analysis for Spec 358 readiness  
**Created**: 2026-06-06  
**Feature**: `specs/358-operationrun-queue-truth-foundation/spec.md`

## Candidate Selection And Guardrails

- [x] CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided draft plus repo-verified current code truth.
- [x] CHK002 No `specs/358-*` package existed before this prep.
- [x] CHK003 Related historical specs are treated as context only: 149, 160, 233, 268, 270, and 272.
- [x] CHK004 The selected slice is narrow and reviewable: generic queue-truth alignment only, with no new persistence or adapter framework.
- [x] CHK005 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in `spec.md`.

## Required Prep Artifacts

- [x] CHK006 `spec.md` exists and contains no template placeholders.
- [x] CHK007 `plan.md` exists and is repo-aware.
- [x] CHK008 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
- [x] CHK009 This checklist exists.

## Spec Quality

- [x] CHK010 Spec Candidate Check is completed.
- [x] CHK011 The spec keeps `OperationRun` truth derived-only and does not introduce new persisted lifecycle state.
- [x] CHK012 The spec clearly separates current repo reconciliation truth from the user's broader future-framework wording.
- [x] CHK013 The spec states clear goals, non-goals, requirements, risks, and acceptance criteria.
- [x] CHK014 The proportionality review rejects a new queue-health subsystem or adapter registry by default.

## Plan / Task Alignment

- [x] CHK015 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change.
- [x] CHK016 The plan explicitly preserves existing scheduled and adapter reconciliation commands as out-of-scope context.
- [x] CHK017 The plan keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider-registration location visible.
- [x] CHK018 The tasks include tests-first work and explicit runtime validation commands.
- [x] CHK019 The task list keeps scope bounded and includes anti-creep guardrails against persistence or framework expansion.

## UI / Monitoring Coverage

- [x] CHK020 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim no-impact.
- [x] CHK021 The changed surfaces are correctly classified as existing monitoring family follow-through, not a new strategic customer surface.
- [x] CHK022 No new page-report identity or route-inventory expansion is required for this bounded monitoring-family wording fix.
- [x] CHK023 Audience-aware disclosure and no-overclaim wording boundaries are explicit.

## Test Governance

- [x] CHK024 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Unit plus focused Feature.
- [x] CHK025 No broad new browser or heavy-governance family is introduced.
- [x] CHK026 Planned validation commands are explicit and file-scoped.

## Readiness Gate Outcome

- [x] CHK027 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
- [x] CHK028 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
- [x] CHK029 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
- [x] CHK030 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.

## Review Outcome

- [x] Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
- [x] Workflow outcome: keep
- [x] Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`
- [x] Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based artifact review checklist; no standalone local `speckit.analyze` command was available in this repo surface
- [x] Tooling note: the repo-generated branch number advanced to `1000`, and local `setup-plan.sh` rejected that 4-digit prefix; the final prep artifacts were therefore authored manually under the user-requested `358` package without changing application runtime code