# Requirements Checklist: Spec 359 - OperationRun Reconciliation Adapter Framework & Review Compose Adapter

**Purpose**: Preparation analysis for Spec 359 readiness  
**Created**: 2026-06-06  
**Feature**: `specs/359-operationrun-reconciliation-adapter-framework-review-compose-adapter/spec.md`

## Candidate Selection And Guardrails

- [x] CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided draft plus repo-verified current code truth.
- [x] CHK002 No `specs/359-*` package existed before this prep.
- [x] CHK003 Related existing specs were checked for completed/prepared/runtime signals and are treated as context only: 357, 358, and 311.
- [x] CHK004 The active candidate queue's `no safe automatic next-best-prep target` note is respected; this package is an intentional manual promotion rather than an auto-selected queue item.
- [x] CHK005 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in `spec.md`, especially the existing restore adapter precedent and current reconciliation metadata seam.

## Required Prep Artifacts

- [x] CHK006 `spec.md` exists and contains no template placeholders.
- [x] CHK007 `plan.md` exists and is repo-aware.
- [x] CHK008 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
- [x] CHK009 This checklist exists.

## Spec Quality

- [x] CHK010 Spec Candidate Check is completed and scored above the approval threshold.
- [x] CHK011 The spec keeps `OperationRun` persistence unchanged and explicitly forbids a new status/reconciled column.
- [x] CHK012 The spec explains why a narrow adapter contract is justified now despite the constitution's anti-abstraction bias.
- [x] CHK013 The spec keeps scope bounded to review-compose truth, duplicate recovery, and existing monitoring/review-start surfaces.
- [x] CHK014 The proportionality review rejects a universal reconciliation engine, schema expansion, and cross-domain adapter sprawl.

## Plan / Task Alignment

- [x] CHK015 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change, including the current restore adapter precedent and current review-compose seams.
- [x] CHK016 The plan keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider-registration location visible.
- [x] CHK017 The plan explicitly requires a PGSQL lane for duplicate-index and lock behavior.
- [x] CHK018 The tasks start with repo truth and failing tests before runtime edits.
- [x] CHK019 The tasks include explicit anti-creep guardrails against new persistence, universal adapters, and destructive cleanup.

## UI / Monitoring / Review Coverage

- [x] CHK020 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim a new page family.
- [x] CHK021 The changed surfaces are correctly classified as existing monitoring/detail and review-start feedback follow-through, not a new strategic customer surface.
- [x] CHK022 No new page-report identity or route-inventory expansion is required unless implementation proves a materially new visible hierarchy.
- [x] CHK023 Audience-aware disclosure and no-raw-SQL wording boundaries are explicit.

## Test Governance

- [x] CHK024 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Unit + Feature + one bounded Browser smoke, with PGSQL lane coverage for duplicate-index truth.
- [x] CHK025 No heavy-governance family is introduced.
- [x] CHK026 Planned validation commands are explicit and include Spec 358 plus review/report regressions.

## Readiness Gate Outcome

- [x] CHK027 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
- [x] CHK028 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
- [x] CHK029 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
- [x] CHK030 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.

## Review Outcome

- [x] Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
- [x] Workflow outcome: keep
- [x] Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`
- [x] Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based artifact review checklist; no standalone local `speckit.analyze` command was available in this repo surface
- [x] Tooling note: Spec Kit branch/spec creation succeeded via `create-new-feature.sh`, `setup-plan.sh` generated the plan file, and `tasks.md` plus this checklist were authored manually because this repo surface does not expose standalone local tasks/analyze generators