# Specification Quality Checklist: Public Website Positioning & Content Architecture

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning

**Created**: 2026-05-25

**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Validation pass 1 completed on 2026-05-25.
- No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain; the supplied positioning, provider posture, and trust boundaries were specific enough to avoid open questions.
- Repository/workspace contract references and validation commands are intentional delivery guards, not framework-selection leakage.
- Existing downstream planning artifacts under `specs/404-public-content-messaging/` predate this refreshed spec and should be reconciled before implementation continues.