# Specification Quality Checklist: Governance-as-a-Service Packaging v1

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and repo fit before planning  
**Created**: 2026-05-01  
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details leak into the feature contract beyond repo-real route and surface references needed for local convention fit
- [x] The spec is focused on user value, trust, sellability, and behavior rather than an implementation diff
- [x] The spec is written so non-technical stakeholders can understand the product outcome and scope boundaries
- [x] All mandatory sections requested by the repo template and constitution are completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic enough to validate product outcome rather than code shape
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions are identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover the primary packaging flows
- [x] The feature stays on one bounded on-demand package for one released review context
- [x] The spec explicitly depends on the shared customer-safe interpretation layer and forbids bypassing it
- [x] The roadmap phrase `open decisions` is narrowed to repo-real exception or risk-acceptance governance decision truth
- [x] No new panel, package domain, report engine, schedule, or campaign system is introduced
- [x] Existing review, review-pack, evidence, and stored-report surfaces remain the reuse path

## Test Governance

- [x] Planned validation stays bounded to focused `confidence` coverage plus one explicit `browser` smoke
- [x] The spec reuses existing review, tenant-review, review-pack, and evidence test families instead of introducing a new heavy family
- [x] Reviewer handoff and minimal proof commands are explicit

## Notes

- Reviewed against `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`, `docs/product/roadmap.md`, `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`, `specs/257-governance-decision-convergence/spec.md`, `specs/258-customer-review-productization/spec.md`, `specs/259-compliance-evidence-mapping/spec.md`, and `.specify/memory/constitution.md` on 2026-05-01.
- No application implementation was performed while preparing this spec.

## Review Outcome

- **Outcome class**: `repo-fit-ready`
- **Outcome**: `keep`
- **Reason**: The spec stays narrowly on one management-ready package over existing released-review truth, explicitly records the interpretation dependency, narrows the ambiguous `open decisions` phrase to repo-real governance decision truth, and avoids introducing a second package domain.
- **Workflow result**: Ready for `/speckit.plan`