# Specification Quality Checklist: Workspace Chooser v1 (Enterprise) **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning **Created**: 2026-02-22 **Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md) ## Content Quality - [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) - Note: Spec references existing codebase components by name for context (WorkspaceContext, AuditActionId) but requirements are behavior-focused. Framework names appear in UI Action Matrix as required by template. - [x] Focused on user value and business needs - [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders (user stories are plain language) - [x] All mandatory sections completed ## Requirement Completeness - [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain - [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous - [x] Success criteria are measurable - [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) - [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined - [x] Edge cases are identified (zero memberships, archived workspace, stale session, forced chooser) - [x] Scope is clearly bounded (v1 vs v2 backlog explicit) - [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified (existing infrastructure documented in Context section) ## Feature Readiness - [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria - [x] User scenarios cover primary flows (auto-resume single, auto-resume last-used, chooser fallback, revoked membership, manual switch, audit) - [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria - [x] No implementation details leak into specification (behavior-first language throughout) ## Constitution Alignment - [x] RBAC-UX: authorization plane stated (workspace /admin scope) - [x] RBAC-UX: 404 vs 403 semantics defined (non-member → 404) - [x] RBAC-UX: server-side enforcement described (middleware) - [x] RBAC-UX: capability registry referenced (Capabilities::WORKSPACE_MANAGE) - [x] Audit: audit events defined with payloads - [x] UX-001: exemption documented (context selector, not CRUD page) - [x] UI Action Matrix completed ## Notes - Spec deliberately uses `users.last_workspace_id` (existing column) instead of proposing a new `user_preferences` table, aligning with current codebase patterns. - Middleware algorithm is specified in detail because it's the core business logic of the feature; still expressed as behavior rules, not code. - All items pass. Spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`.