# Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Dashboard KPI & Attention Truth Alignment

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning  
**Created**: 2026-04-03  
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Validation pass 1: complete.
- The spec stays bounded to the existing tenant dashboard surface family and explicitly rejects a new global tenant-posture component or persisted dashboard aggregate.
- The main validation focus was keeping tenant-level KPI, attention, compare, and recent surfaces aligned around the same tenant truth while preserving clear separation between posture, activity, and recency.