# Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 344 - Customer Review Workspace Density & Audience Mode Polish **Purpose**: Validate Spec 344 preparation completeness before implementation. **Created**: 2026-06-01 **Feature**: `specs/344-customer-review-workspace-density-audience-polish/spec.md` ## Candidate Selection Gate - [x] CHK001 The selected candidate is directly provided by the user as Spec 344 (follow-up after Specs 342–343). - [x] CHK002 The candidate aligns with current roadmap direction: customer-safe review consumption and operator workflow maturity on UI-038 (no portal/framework rewrite). - [x] CHK003 No existing `specs/344-*` package or `344-*` branch was found before this prep. - [x] CHK004 Related specs were checked for completed-spec signals and are treated as context only (337, 342, 343). - [x] CHK005 Close alternatives are deferred rather than hidden scope (governance inbox follow-through, localization adoption, provider readiness, PSA handoff). - [x] CHK006 Scope is narrowed to one strategic surface (`/admin/reviews/workspace`) and UI-only hierarchy changes. ## Content Quality - [x] CHK007 `spec.md` defines problem, user value, functional requirements, non-goals, acceptance criteria, assumptions, risks, and open questions. - [x] CHK008 `plan.md` lists likely affected repo surfaces and preserves repo-truth-first execution. - [x] CHK009 `tasks.md` is ordered into small phases with explicit test/browser/screenshot/validation tasks. - [x] CHK010 No unresolved template placeholders remain in `spec.md`, `plan.md`, or `tasks.md`. ## Constitution And Scope - [x] CHK011 Proportionality review is present and explicitly rejects new persistence, new status families, and new frameworks. - [x] CHK012 Workspace/environment isolation boundaries and deny-as-not-found posture are preserved (no authorization weakening). - [x] CHK013 UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are completed for UI-038 (strategic surface). - [x] CHK014 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture, panel provider location, destructive-action confirmation rules, asset strategy, and testing plan are explicit. ## Plan Quality - [x] CHK015 Plan sequencing is baseline inventory → hierarchy refactor → keep Spec 343 semantics → tests/browser → UI audit artifact decision. - [x] CHK016 Deployment/ops impact is explicit (no env/migrations/queues/scheduler/assets expected). - [x] CHK017 No Graph/provider calls during UI render are enforced by plan constraints. ## Task Quality - [x] CHK018 Tasks include concrete repo surfaces and avoid inventing new runtime paths beyond UI-038 touch points. - [x] CHK019 Tasks include Feature/Livewire tests and one bounded Browser smoke (strategic surface). - [x] CHK020 Tasks include screenshot artifacts and “unreachable state” handling without faking backend truth. - [x] CHK021 Tasks explicitly forbid new domain model/persistence and forbid rewriting completed specs. ## Spec Readiness Gate - [x] CHK022 `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` exist. - [x] CHK023 Open questions do not block safe implementation. - [x] CHK024 Scope is bounded enough for a later implementation loop. - [x] CHK025 Result: ready for implementation loop.