# Preparation Review Checklist: Customer Review Workspace Productization v1

**Purpose**: Validate repo-fit preparation quality after `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` are complete  
**Reviewed**: 2026-04-30  
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)  
**Supporting artifacts**: [plan.md](../plan.md), [tasks.md](../tasks.md), [research.md](../research.md), [data-model.md](../data-model.md), [quickstart.md](../quickstart.md), [customer-review-productization.openapi.yaml](../contracts/customer-review-productization.openapi.yaml)

## Candidate Fit

- [x] The selected candidate still matches the active P0 queue in `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`, the current priority order in `docs/product/roadmap.md`, and the open-gap wording in `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`
- [x] Existing `specs/` coverage was checked so this package stays a new productization follow-up rather than a duplicate of Specs 249, 253, 254, 255, or 257
- [x] The scope stays on the customer-review productization delta over the existing workspace and released-review detail flow instead of reopening review foundations
- [x] Broader baseline/control overlays and management-packaging follow-through are explicitly deferred rather than hidden inside this slice

## Constitution Fit

- [x] The package stays on the existing Filament v5 + Livewire v4 admin plane and does not introduce panel/provider-registration work beyond the current `bootstrap/providers.php` truth
- [x] No new persistence, customer identity plane, portal shell, authoring flow, publication engine, remediation flow, or destructive action surface is introduced
- [x] Workspace/tenant isolation and capability-first RBAC remain explicit, including `404` for non-members and optional capability gating only for secondary access paths
- [x] One dominant safe action per changed surface is explicitly described, with secondary proof affordances demoted out of peer header-action status
- [x] Global-search safety is preserved without introducing a new searchable resource or widening existing review/evidence discovery across tenant boundaries
- [x] Asset strategy remains unchanged; if later implementation unexpectedly registers assets, deployment still uses the existing `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` step

## Artifact Consistency

- [x] `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` all target the same workspace-summary plus released-review-detail follow-up
- [x] The likely repo surfaces and plan structure match the current repository layout, including `apps/platform/lang` rather than a fictional app-local language directory
- [x] Tasks directly cover RBAC, auditability, disclosure hierarchy, localization, access/unavailable states, and global-search safety
- [x] Supporting artifacts exist, no unresolved template markers remain, and the package stays implementation-ready without touching application code

## Test Governance

- [x] Validation lanes remain explicitly bounded to `confidence` plus one existing `browser` smoke
- [x] The package reuses the existing reviews test family instead of creating a new heavy-governance or browser family
- [x] Reviewer proof commands remain explicit and minimal for the touched workspace, detail, pack, and proof surfaces
- [x] The close-out path records the review outcome, guardrail status, and any `document-in-feature` vs `follow-up-spec` decision inside the spec package

## Notes

- Reviewed after artifact alignment on 2026-04-30.
- This repository's preparation artifacts are intentionally implementation-oriented, so concrete routes, classes, affected surfaces, and validation commands are expected rather than treated as leakage.
- No application implementation was performed while preparing or reviewing this package.
- Implementation close-out on 2026-04-30 passed the focused feature checks, bounded browser smoke, and Pint. Audit gaps were handled with bounded additive action IDs for workspace entry and proof-open events; global-search and asset strategy remained unchanged.

## Review Outcome

- **Outcome**: `keep`
- **Reason**: The package remains the narrow customer-review productization follow-up, explicitly records the baseline/control deferral, aligns the detail-page action hierarchy, and adds direct task coverage for global-search safety.
- **Workflow result**: Ready for `/speckit.implement` after this preparation review.

## Implementation Outcome

- **Outcome**: `implemented`
- **Workflow result**: Ready for manual review after the implementation loop. No confirmed in-scope findings remain after the focused confidence checks, browser smoke, formatting, and post-implementation analysis.