# Specification Quality Checklist: Finding Governance Health & Resolution Semantics Surface Hardening

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning  
**Created**: 2026-03-27  
**Feature**: [spec.md](/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/specs/166-finding-governance-health/spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No code-level implementation mechanics (new classes, schema, jobs, or algorithms) are prescribed
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for product, design, and implementation stakeholders in repo-native spec language
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No code-level implementation mechanics leak into the specification beyond required route, RBAC, operator-surface contract detail, and UI Action Matrix location references

## Notes

- Validation pass 1 completed against the finished spec.
- No open clarification markers remain.
- Proportionality review completed: the spec explicitly records that it adds no new source of truth, persistence, abstraction, state family, or cross-domain taxonomy.
- The spec intentionally references existing route surfaces and shared semantic primitives because this repo's spec template requires operator-surface and constitution alignment details; it does not prescribe implementation mechanics.