---
title: Policy Evidence
slug: en/docs/policy-evidence
description: How Tenantial frames policy evidence as readable review context and why evidence should be more than a loose collection of screenshots or exports.
editUrl: false
lastUpdated: false
---

In Tenantial, evidence is not decorative output. It is the part of the review story that makes clear what a finding, exception, or decision is actually grounded in.

## What this page covers

- what policy evidence means in the public Tenantial context
- how known states, observations, and review questions are tied together
- why evidence should not be mistaken for broad proof guarantees

## What evidence means here

Policy evidence ties together known configuration states, relevant changes, and explanatory context. Its job is to stabilize review conversations, not to dump raw material without framing.

## What reviewers should be able to read from it

- which known state acts as the reference point
- which observations or differences matter for the current question
- how findings, accepted risks, and next steps connect back to that basis

## Why this matters for buyers

When evidence only exists as a folder of screenshots, the next decision stays unclear. A readable evidence base shortens conversations between delivery, security, management, and audit stakeholders.

## Boundaries of this page

This page does not promise gapless or court-proof proof. It only explains how Tenantial frames evidence in its public product narrative as a review aid.

## Related links

- [Drift detection](/en/docs/drift-detection/)
- [Review packs & decisions](/en/docs/review-packs-decisions/)
- [Findings, exceptions & accepted risk](/en/docs/findings-exceptions-accepted-risk/)
- [Review packs](/en/platform/review-packs)