# Specification Quality Checklist: Commercial Entitlements and Billing-State Maturity

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and readiness before planning or implementation.
**Created**: 2026-04-28
**Feature**: [../spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Review Outcome

- [x] Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
- [x] Workflow outcome: keep
- [x] Test-governance impact is explicitly recorded in the spec

## Notes

- Repo-specific surface names and existing product terms are used to anchor the spec to current truth, but the spec does not prescribe languages, frameworks, APIs, or low-level implementation design.
- No open clarification markers remain. The bounded assumptions are the default `active_paid` resolution for unset workspaces and the distinct `grace` behavior that freezes onboarding expansion without blocking in-scope review-pack starts.
- Implementation close-out keeps the workflow outcome as `keep`. The Livewire browser-smoke finding was fixed inside scope by making workspace route resolution accept Livewire serialized workspace parameters; no follow-up spec is required.