# Preparation Review Checklist: Compliance Evidence Mapping v1

**Purpose**: Validate repo-fit preparation quality after `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` are complete  
**Reviewed**: 2026-04-30  
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)  
**Supporting artifacts**: [plan.md](../plan.md), [research.md](../research.md), [data-model.md](../data-model.md), [quickstart.md](../quickstart.md), [tasks.md](../tasks.md), [compliance-evidence-mapping.openapi.yaml](../contracts/compliance-evidence-mapping.openapi.yaml)  
**Related standards**: [List Surface Review Checklist](../../../docs/product/standards/list-surface-review-checklist.md)

## Candidate Fit

- [x] The selected candidate still matches the active `Compliance Evidence Mapping v1` entry in `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`, the sequencing in `docs/product/roadmap.md`, and the moat blocker wording in `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`
- [x] Existing `specs/` coverage was checked so this package stays a new follow-up rather than duplicating Specs 249 through 258
- [x] The scope stays on one bounded interpretation overlay over existing canonical-control and review truth instead of reopening control foundations or packaging work
- [x] Governance-as-a-Service Packaging and framework-specific overlays are explicitly deferred rather than hidden inside this slice

## Constitution Fit

- [x] The package stays on the existing Filament v5 plus Livewire v4 admin plane and does not introduce panel or provider-registration work beyond the current `bootstrap/providers.php` truth
- [x] No new persistence table, no new report engine, no OperationRun workflow, no portal shell, and no destructive action surface are introduced
- [x] Workspace and tenant isolation remain explicit, including `404` for non-members and out-of-scope tenant targets and capability gating only on reused secondary evidence paths
- [x] One dominant safe action per changed surface is explicitly described, with workspace list and detail disclosure roles remaining consistent across spec, plan, and tasks
- [x] Global-search safety is preserved without introducing a new searchable resource or widening review/evidence discovery across tenant boundaries
- [x] Asset strategy remains unchanged; if later implementation unexpectedly registers assets, deployment still uses the existing `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` step

## Surface Guardrails

- [x] The package references and satisfies the repo's [List Surface Review Checklist](../../../docs/product/standards/list-surface-review-checklist.md) for the customer review workspace list surface
- [x] The customer review workspace remains the primary decision surface with one dominant `Open released review` path and no competing list-row proof action
- [x] The released-review detail surface remains explanation-first, read-only in customer-workspace mode, and keeps supporting evidence as explicit in-body drilldown
- [x] No page-local control taxonomy, framework naming, or second interpretation path is introduced across the changed surfaces

## Artifact Consistency

- [x] `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `data-model.md`, and the conceptual contract all target the same shared `control_interpretation` contract and the same workspace plus released-review detail flow
- [x] The primary released-review detail route now follows the same `404` posture described in the spec, with explicit `403` handling reserved only for gated secondary evidence routes
- [x] The workspace contract now models only entitled tenants with a released review, while the no-released-review case remains a page-level empty state instead of a parallel row model
- [x] The required prep artifact `checklists/requirements.md` exists and includes explicit review outcome and workflow outcome fields
- [x] The required `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh copilot` step is recorded as completed during planning

## Test Governance

- [x] Validation lanes remain explicitly bounded to `confidence` plus one existing `browser` smoke
- [x] The package reuses existing `TenantReview`, `CustomerReviewWorkspace`, and evidence proof test families instead of creating a new heavy-governance or browser family
- [x] Reviewer proof commands remain explicit and minimal for the touched workspace, detail, evidence, and audit surfaces
- [x] The package includes explicit close-out handling for global-search safety, shared-interpretation-path consistency, and audit-metadata reuse

## Notes

- Reviewed after `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `research.md`, `data-model.md`, `quickstart.md`, `tasks.md`, and the conceptual contract were aligned on 2026-04-30.
- This repository's preparation artifacts are intentionally implementation-oriented, so concrete routes, classes, list-surface standards, and validation commands are expected rather than treated as leakage.
- Implementation completed on 2026-04-30. The implementation keeps one shared `control_interpretation` contract, reuses existing audit events, preserves global-search disablement, and keeps the customer review workspace list surface released-review-only with one dominant inspect action.

## Review Outcome

- **Outcome class**: `acceptable-special-case`
- **Outcome**: `keep`
- **Reason**: The package keeps the new semantic layer bounded to one versioned interpretation overlay, records the list-surface guardrail expectations, aligns primary-route access semantics to the repo's `404` posture, and removes the extra no-review row branch so the implementation target stays narrow.
- **Workflow result**: Implemented and validated after the Spec Kit implementation loop.

## Implementation Review Outcome

- **Guardrail / Smoke Coverage**: PASS. Focused feature/browser tests and adjacent contract tests passed; Pint passed.
- **Shared interpretation path**: PASS. Composition writes one stored v1 interpretation; workspace and detail read it.
- **Audit metadata reuse**: PASS. Existing events carry `source_surface`, `review_id` where applicable, `tenant_filter_id`, and `interpretation_version`; no new event family was introduced.
- **Global-search safety**: PASS. Tenant review, review pack, and evidence resources remain globally disabled.
- **Residual risks**: none confirmed in scope after the implementation loop.