# Specification Quality Checklist: MSP & Mittelstand Use-Case Pages **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning **Created**: 2026-05-26 **Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md) ## Content Quality - [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) - [x] Focused on user value and business needs - [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders - [x] All mandatory sections completed ## Requirement Completeness - [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain - [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous - [x] Success criteria are measurable - [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) - [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined - [x] Edge cases are identified - [x] Scope is clearly bounded - [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified ## Feature Readiness - [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria - [x] User scenarios cover primary flows - [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria - [x] No implementation details leak into specification ## Notes - Initial validation passed with no remaining clarification markers. - The spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`. - 2026-05-27 implementation close-out: `/use-cases/msp`, `/use-cases/mittelstand`, `/en/use-cases/msp`, and `/en/use-cases/mittelstand` were implemented with homepage, navigation, footer, and compact platform-page discoverability. - Browser validation passed via `corepack pnpm build`, `WEBSITE_PORT=4322 corepack pnpm test tests/smoke/public-routes.spec.ts tests/smoke/interaction.spec.ts`, and `WEBSITE_PORT=4322 corepack pnpm --filter @tenantatlas/website test` (`324 passed`, `6 skipped`). - Static forbidden-term scans over `apps/website/src`, `apps/website/public`, and `apps/website/dist` returned no matches; no `apps/website/public` or `apps/website/src/images` proof artifacts were added. - `corepack pnpm --filter @tenantatlas/website format:check` still reports nine pre-existing unrelated formatting issues outside this feature's touched files.