# Specification Quality Checklist: Tenantial Enterprise UI Audit Foundation

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness, preparation quality, and readiness before implementation.
**Created**: 2026-05-17
**Feature**: `specs/323-tenantial-enterprise-ui-audit-foundation/spec.md`

## Candidate Selection Gate

- [x] Explicit user-provided Spec 323 request was selected as the source of truth for this preparation pass.
- [x] The additional user requirement that 323 becomes an ongoing Design Coverage Gate baseline is included.
- [x] Completed-spec guardrail checked that no existing `specs/323-*` package or `323-*` branch was present before generation.
- [x] Specs 318, 319, 320, 321, and 322 were treated as dependency/historical context and not rewritten.
- [x] Roadmap/spec-candidate queue was reviewed; active auto-prep queue is empty, so this package proceeds only because the user directly supplied/promoted Spec 323.
- [x] Close alternatives were deferred to Specs 324, 325, 326, and 327.
- [x] The selected slice is docs-first UI audit foundation plus ongoing registry gate only.

## Content Quality

- [x] Problem statement is product-visible and tied to route/page design-coverage debt.
- [x] User value is clear: every reachable page receives a design decision or an explicit unresolved/internal/deprecated marker.
- [x] Scope is bounded to audit docs, screenshots, page reports, matrix, follow-up grouping, registry gate, Spec Kit process templates/prompts, PR template, and PR guard script.
- [x] No runtime redesign or application implementation is included in preparation artifacts.
- [x] No migration, seeder, package, env var, queue, scheduler, storage, route, auth, runtime deployment, or deployment asset change is planned.
- [x] No unresolved `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain.
- [x] Mandatory Spec Candidate Check is complete.
- [x] Spec includes explicit non-goals and stop conditions.

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] Functional requirements are testable and unambiguous.
- [x] Requirements cover audit structure, route inventory, screenshots, page reports, coverage matrix, strategic surfaces, grouped follow-ups, unresolved pages, dangerous actions, customer-safe review, context ambiguity, misleading status, ongoing gate, Constitution principle, Spec Kit templates, implementation prompts, PR template, and PR guard script.
- [x] Non-functional requirements cover repo truth, Markdown stability, screenshot naming, bounded responsive review, no runtime frameworking, and validation.
- [x] Success criteria are measurable by artifact existence, counts, links, and validation result.
- [x] User stories include independent test descriptions and acceptance scenarios.
- [x] Edge cases cover auth blocks, seeded-data needs, provider connection needs, redirect loops, runtime errors, hidden routes, legacy ambiguity, and screenshot blockers.
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions are identified.

## Plan Quality

- [x] Laravel, Filament, Livewire, Pest, PostgreSQL, Sail, and docs/browser-audit context is recorded.
- [x] Livewire v4.0+ compliance is explicitly noted through Livewire 4.1.4.
- [x] Laravel 12 panel provider location remains `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php`.
- [x] Global search impact is assessed as unchanged because no Resource code changes are planned.
- [x] Destructive/high-impact action handling is audit-only and does not change action behavior.
- [x] Asset strategy is assessed as no new Filament assets/no new `filament:assets` step.
- [x] Existing repo seams and discovery paths are named.
- [x] Browser audit/screenshot plan is concrete and bounded.
- [x] Test governance classifies the change as Markdown/browser-audit only.

## Task Quality

- [x] Tasks are ordered from guardrails through structure, discovery, browser screenshots, reports, matrix, gate documentation, and validation.
- [x] Task IDs follow the required checkbox format.
- [x] File paths are concrete where repo surfaces and audit artifacts are known.
- [x] Tasks include explicit route discovery and file-based discovery steps.
- [x] Tasks include the ongoing Design Coverage Gate, later UI spec DoD, Spec Kit template updates, agent prompt guardrail, PR template checkbox, and CI/review guard.
- [x] Tasks include validation and final reporting obligations.
- [x] Non-goals and stop conditions prevent runtime implementation.

## Constitution / Repo Alignment

- [x] Workspace/environment/tenant context is audited but not changed.
- [x] RBAC, dangerous actions, and customer-safe exposure are reviewed but not changed.
- [x] Proportionality review covers docs-only classification ownership cost.
- [x] No runtime taxonomy, enum, persisted entity, or UI framework is introduced.
- [x] Test governance names no-runtime-impact, UI/Productization Coverage guard validation, and no full-suite requirement.
- [x] Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is explicitly addressed.
- [x] Provider-boundary terminology is flagged as audit concern only, not changed.

## Preparation Analysis Outcome

- [x] Preparation artifacts are internally consistent after manual `/speckit.analyze`-style review.
- [x] Every functional requirement maps to one or more tasks.
- [x] Every task maps to Spec 323 audit scope or stop-condition enforcement.
- [x] No preparation issue requires application implementation.
- [x] Candidate Selection Gate result: PASS.
- [x] Spec Readiness Gate result: PASS for later docs/browser-audit implementation.

## Notes

- Repository has prompt/agent definitions for `speckit.tasks` and `speckit.analyze`, but no local executable Bash command for those phases. Tasks and analysis were therefore produced repo-conformantly from the templates and checked manually in this checklist.
- Full suite is intentionally not part of preparation or later Markdown-only validation unless runtime changes are introduced, which would violate this spec's scope.