# Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 333 - Restore Create UX Final Productization **Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation planning and execution. **Created**: 2026-05-26 **Feature**: `specs/333-restore-create-ux-final-productization/spec.md` ## Content Quality - [x] No application implementation is included in the preparation artifacts. - [x] Focused on operator value, safety, proof visibility, and product workflow needs. - [x] All mandatory repository sections are completed. - [x] The spec preserves TenantPilot/TenantAtlas terminology and route/context language. ## Requirement Completeness - [x] No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain. - [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous. - [x] Success criteria are measurable. - [x] Acceptance scenarios are defined for each primary user story. - [x] Edge cases are identified. - [x] Scope is clearly bounded to Restore Create UX productization. - [x] Dependencies and assumptions are identified. ## Constitution / Guardrail Alignment - [x] Spec Candidate Check is filled and passes SPEC-GATE-001. - [x] UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are filled for the changed wizard surface. - [x] Proportionality review explicitly rejects new architecture, persisted truth, enum/status families, and backend rewrites. - [x] RBAC, workspace/environment isolation, proof semantics, OperationRun UX impact, and provider-boundary impact are addressed. - [x] Test governance and validation lanes are explicit. ## Feature Readiness - [x] `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, and `restore-create-state-contract.md` exist. - [x] Tasks are ordered, small, verifiable, and implementation-ready. - [x] Required screenshot artifacts path is present. - [x] Close alternatives and follow-up specs are kept out of scope. ## Notes - Preparation analysis should re-check that no task requires a backend rewrite, new presenter, migration, package, or new Product Process Flow architecture. - Implementation must update spec/plan before runtime work if repo truth differs from skip behavior, item-level selection, proof-link availability, or group picker context assumptions.