# Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 342 - Customer Review Workspace v1 Final Consumption Productization

**Purpose**: Validate Spec 342 preparation completeness before implementation.  
**Created**: 2026-06-01  
**Feature**: `specs/342-customer-review-workspace-final-consumption-productization/spec.md`

## Candidate Selection Gate

- [x] CHK001 The selected candidate is directly user-provided as Spec 342 and maps to `customer-review-workspace-v1-completion` in `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`.
- [x] CHK002 The selected candidate aligns with the top current roadmap sellability priority: Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion.
- [x] CHK003 No existing `specs/342-*` package or branch was found before Spec Kit creation.
- [x] CHK004 Related completed/prepared specs were checked and are context only: 249, 258, 312, 326, 329, 335, 336, 337, 340, and 341.
- [x] CHK005 Close alternatives are deferred rather than hidden scope: localization, governance inbox, commercial entitlements, provider readiness, and PSA/support handoff.
- [x] CHK006 The scope is a small final-consumption productization slice on the existing `/admin/reviews/workspace` surface.

## Content Quality

- [x] CHK007 `spec.md` defines problem, user value, functional requirements, non-goals, acceptance criteria, success criteria, assumptions, risks, and open questions.
- [x] CHK008 `plan.md` lists likely affected repo surfaces and distinguishes implementation touch points from supporting surfaces to inspect.
- [x] CHK009 `tasks.md` is ordered into small phases with tests, browser smoke, UI coverage, validation, and explicit non-goals.
- [x] CHK010 `repo-truth-map.md` exists and classifies current review/evidence/pack/finding/accepted-risk/audit/operation truth.
- [x] CHK011 `customer-review-consumption-state-contract.md` exists and defines derived display states without adding persisted truth.
- [x] CHK012 No unresolved template placeholders remain in `spec.md`, `plan.md`, or `tasks.md`.

## Constitution And Scope

- [x] CHK013 Spec Candidate Check is filled, scored 11/12, and approved as Core Enterprise.
- [x] CHK014 Proportionality review is present for the possible page-local presenter/state contract.
- [x] CHK015 The spec does not introduce new migrations, persisted readiness truth, enum/status family, provider framework, or portal architecture.
- [x] CHK016 Workspace/environment isolation, deny-as-not-found semantics, and canonical `environment_id` behavior are explicit.
- [x] CHK017 UI Surface Impact and UI/Productization Coverage are completed for an existing strategic customer-facing surface.
- [x] CHK018 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance, panel provider location, global-search posture, destructive-action rules, asset strategy, and testing plan are explicit.

## Plan Quality

- [x] CHK019 The plan sequences work as repo-truth gate → tests first → state contract/presenter → first-screen productization → RBAC/context → browser smoke → validation.
- [x] CHK020 The plan states no migrations, env vars, packages, queues, scheduler, storage, Graph scopes, Dokploy, or Filament asset changes are expected.
- [x] CHK021 The plan requires spec/plan update before any high-impact action, asset registration, backend generation, or persisted truth scope appears.
- [x] CHK022 Test governance is explicit: confidence + one bounded browser smoke.

## Task Quality

- [x] CHK023 Tasks include concrete file paths and avoid inventing runtime paths beyond likely implementation touch points.
- [x] CHK024 Tasks include Feature/Livewire tests before UI implementation.
- [x] CHK025 Tasks include browser states and screenshot artifacts while allowing unreachable states to be documented rather than faked.
- [x] CHK026 Tasks include UI coverage close-out and final validation commands.
- [x] CHK027 Tasks explicitly forbid rewriting completed specs or reintroducing `/admin/t`/legacy query aliases.

## Spec Readiness Gate

- [x] CHK028 `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` exist.
- [x] CHK029 Required supporting prep artifacts exist: `repo-truth-map.md`, `customer-review-consumption-state-contract.md`, and `checklists/requirements.md`.
- [x] CHK030 No open question blocks safe implementation; unsupported runtime concepts are explicitly unavailable/deferred.
- [x] CHK031 The implementation scope is bounded enough for a later implementation loop.
- [x] CHK032 Result: ready for implementation loop.

## Review Outcome

- [x] CHK033 Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case.
- [x] CHK034 Workflow outcome: keep.
- [x] CHK035 Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Exception / Smoke Coverage`.