# Specification Quality Checklist: Drift MVP (044)

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to implementation
**Created**: 2026-01-12
**Feature**: [specs/044-drift-mvp/spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) (spec.md contains scenarios/rules/states/acceptance only)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs (spec.md: Purpose, User Scenarios, Acceptance Criteria)
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders (spec.md uses plain language; avoids code/framework terms)
- [x] All mandatory sections completed (spec.md includes Purpose, User Scenarios, Rules, Acceptance Criteria)

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain (spec.md: no "[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]" markers)
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous (spec.md: Rules + Acceptance Criteria)
- [x] Success criteria are measurable (spec.md: Acceptance Criteria)
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) (spec.md: Acceptance Criteria)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined (spec.md: Scenario 1/2/3)
- [x] Edge cases are identified (spec.md: blocked state; error state; acknowledgement per comparison)
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded (spec.md: Rules → Coverage (MVP))
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified (spec.md: Rules → UI states; Run tracking)

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria (spec.md: Rules + Acceptance Criteria)
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows (spec.md: Scenario 1/2/3)
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria (spec.md: Acceptance Criteria are measurable and testable)
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification (spec.md avoids implementation and names a generic “persisted run record” only)

## Notes

- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`.
- Constitution gate: this checklist must exist for features that change runtime behavior.