# Preparation Review Checklist: Customer Review Workspace v1

**Purpose**: Validate the customer-safe review-consumption package against the repo's guardrail, disclosure, shared-family, and close-out workflow before implementation  
**Created**: 2026-04-27  
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Applicability And Low-Impact Gate

- [x] CHK001 The package explicitly treats this as an operator-facing and read-only/customer-safe surface change, so the low-impact `N/A` path is not used.
- [x] CHK002 The spec, plan, and tasks carry the same native/shared-primitives-first classification, shared-family relevance, state ownership, and close-out targeting without inventing second wording.

## Native, Shared-Family, And State Ownership

- [x] CHK003 The primary surface remains a native Filament page that composes existing review, pack, and evidence viewers instead of introducing a fake-native shell or standalone customer portal.
- [x] CHK004 Shared detail families remain shared: tenant review, review pack, and evidence detail stay on their existing resource routes, while the new page stays a calm entry point rather than a parallel viewer family.
- [x] CHK005 Shell, page, and URL/query state owners are named once, and the package does not collapse them into new persisted customer-review state.
- [x] CHK006 The likely next operator action and primary inspect/open model stay coherent: `Open latest review` is primary, `Download review pack` is the only safe inline shortcut, and deeper proof stays secondary.

## Shared Pattern Reuse

- [x] CHK007 Cross-cutting interaction classes are explicit, and the shared reuse path is named once through `TenantReviewRegisterService`, existing resource URL helpers, `ArtifactTruthPresenter`, `ReviewPackService`, `RedactionIntegrity`, and the audit pipeline.
- [x] CHK008 The package extends existing shared paths where they are sufficient, and any fallback to a bounded page-local read helper or additive audit action is explicitly constrained as a last resort rather than a new default abstraction.
- [x] CHK009 The package does not create a parallel customer-review UX language; it reuses current artifact-truth, publication-readiness, review-pack, and redaction vocabulary.

## OperationRun Start UX Contract

- [x] CHK019 The package explicitly states that the new page does not create, queue, deduplicate, resume, block, complete, or deep-link to an `OperationRun` as a primary workflow.
- [x] CHK020 Any existing `OperationRun` links remain on reused detail surfaces, so queued toast/link/browser-event/dedupe behavior is not reimplemented on the customer workspace page.
- [x] CHK021 No queued DB notification behavior or terminal notification path is added because the slice stays read-only and never starts a run.
- [x] CHK022 No OperationRun exception is required; if implementation later promotes run-oriented behavior onto the page, that deviation must be recorded in the active close-out entry before merge.

## Provider Boundary And Vocabulary

- [x] CHK010 The package keeps provider-specific semantics behind existing normalized review, evidence, and artifact-truth seams and does not spread provider language into a new platform-core contract.
- [x] CHK011 No retained provider-specific shared boundary is introduced; the slice stays within current workspace, tenant, review, evidence, review-pack, accepted-risk, and audit vocabulary.

## Signals, Exceptions, And Test Depth

- [x] CHK012 The triggered repository signal is explicitly handled as `review-mandatory`, with no hidden hard-stop drift accepted into the package.
- [x] CHK013 No bounded exception is required in the preparation package; if implementation discovers a local read helper or additive audit action is unavoidable, that exception must be documented in the active feature close-out entry instead of becoming silent spread.
- [x] CHK014 The required surface test profile is explicit: `standard-native-filament` for the page plus `shared-detail-family` for navigation into existing review, pack, and evidence detail surfaces.
- [x] CHK015 The chosen lane mix is the narrowest honest proof for this disclosure-heavy slice: focused Feature coverage plus one bounded Browser smoke, with optional Unit coverage only if a small read helper is extracted.

## Audience-Aware Disclosure And Decision Hierarchy

- [x] CHK023 Default-visible content stays decision-first and clearly separated from deeper diagnostics and support/raw evidence.
- [x] CHK024 The read-only/customer-safe default path does not expose raw JSON, copied payloads, fingerprints, internal reason ownership, platform-debug semantics, or unrestricted audit detail by default.
- [x] CHK025 Exactly one dominant next action is primary: `Open latest review`; safe artifact download remains secondary and does not compete at equal weight.
- [x] CHK026 Duplicate visible blocker, status, or next-action summaries are avoided by reusing one artifact-truth summary per row and leaving detailed proof to the existing detail surfaces.
- [x] CHK027 Support/raw sections remain hidden or capability-gated through reused detail routes only, and the page keeps Filament visual language, progressive disclosure, and calm read-only presentation.

## Review Outcome

- [x] CHK016 Review outcome class: `acceptable-special-case`
- [x] CHK017 Workflow outcome: `keep`
- [x] CHK018 The final note location is explicit: the active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Exception / Smoke Coverage` records the guardrail result, smoke outcome, and any bounded implementation exception.

## Notes

- This checklist validates the preparation package only: `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, and the supporting design artifacts. It does not claim application code already exists.
- The slice remains bounded to one read-only customer-safe workspace surface in the current admin plane. No new identity plane, persistence layer, review-generation workflow, remediation path, or raw-diagnostic default path is approved by this package.
- If implementation later proves `TenantReviewRegisterService` reuse insufficient or shows that explicit artifact access requires a new stable `AuditActionId`, that must be recorded as a bounded note in `Guardrail / Exception / Smoke Coverage` rather than silently widening the architecture.

## Implementation Close-out Addendum

- Implemented surface: native `CustomerReviewWorkspace` page and Blade view in the existing admin-plane reviews family, still reusing current tenant review, review-pack, evidence, artifact-truth, RBAC, and audit seams.
- T010 outcome: direct workspace links landed on tenant review detail, review-pack detail, evidence related context, and the tenant review-pack widget. `ReviewRegister` and `EvidenceOverview` remained acceptable reuse via existing row/detail navigation.
- T020 outcome: pack-download plumbing changed, so `ReviewPackDownloadTest.php` and `ReviewPackRbacTest.php` were updated and passed after request-time membership plus `REVIEW_PACK_VIEW` enforcement was added to the signed download route.
- T023 outcome: the current audit infrastructure was reused with additive `tenant_review.opened` and `review_pack.downloaded` action IDs. No new audit store was introduced.
- Smoke evidence outcome: the implementation close-out used the bounded Pest browser smoke plus the focused feature lane as executed smoke proof. No separate manual integrated-browser run was completed.
- Final review outcome class: `acceptable-special-case`.
- Final workflow outcome: `keep`.