# Specification Quality Checklist: Required Permissions Sidebar Context Fix

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2025-02-22
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- This is a small, focused bug fix spec — no data model changes, no new UI screens.
- All constitution alignment sections are N/A or explicitly exempted with rationale.
- The spec references implementation-level details (middleware name, method names) in the Problem Statement for context — this is intentional to clearly identify the root cause for the implementer, while the Requirements and Success Criteria remain technology-agnostic.