TenantAtlas/lang/en/baseline-compare.php
ahmido 7d4d607475 feat: add baseline gap details surfaces (#192)
## Summary
- add baseline compare evidence gap detail modeling and a dedicated Livewire table surface
- extend baseline compare landing and operation run detail surfaces to expose evidence gap details and stats
- add spec artifacts for feature 162 and expand feature coverage with focused Filament and baseline tests

## Notes
- branch: `162-baseline-gap-details`
- commit: `a92dd812`
- working tree was clean after push

## Validation
- tests were not run in this step

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #192
2026-03-24 19:05:23 +00:00

108 lines
5.4 KiB
PHP

<?php
declare(strict_types=1);
return [
/*
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Baseline Compare Landing Page
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
// Duplicate-name warning banner
'duplicate_warning_title' => 'Warning',
'duplicate_warning_body_plural' => ':count policies in this tenant share the same display name. :app cannot match them to the baseline. Please rename the duplicates in the Microsoft Intune portal.',
'duplicate_warning_body_singular' => ':count policy in this tenant shares the same display name. :app cannot match it to the baseline. Please rename the duplicate in the Microsoft Intune portal.',
// Stats card labels
'stat_assigned_baseline' => 'Assigned Baseline',
'stat_total_findings' => 'Total Findings',
'stat_last_compared' => 'Last Compared',
'stat_last_compared_never' => 'Never',
'stat_error' => 'Error',
// Badges
'badge_snapshot' => 'Snapshot #:id',
'badge_coverage_ok' => 'Coverage: OK',
'badge_coverage_warnings' => 'Coverage: Warnings',
'badge_fidelity' => 'Fidelity: :level',
'badge_evidence_gaps' => 'Evidence gaps: :count',
'evidence_gaps_tooltip' => 'Top gaps: :summary',
'evidence_gap_details_heading' => 'Evidence gap details',
'evidence_gap_details_description' => 'Search recorded gap subjects by reason, policy type, or subject key before falling back to raw diagnostics.',
'evidence_gap_search_label' => 'Search gap details',
'evidence_gap_search_placeholder' => 'Search by reason, policy type, or subject key',
'evidence_gap_search_help' => 'Filter matches across reason, policy type, and subject key.',
'evidence_gap_bucket_help' => 'Reason summaries stay separate from the detailed row table below.',
'evidence_gap_reason' => 'Reason',
'evidence_gap_reason_affected' => ':count affected',
'evidence_gap_reason_recorded' => ':count recorded',
'evidence_gap_reason_missing_detail' => ':count missing detail',
'evidence_gap_missing_details_title' => 'Detailed rows were not recorded for this run',
'evidence_gap_missing_details_body' => 'Evidence gaps were counted for this compare run, but subject-level detail was not stored. Review the raw diagnostics below or rerun the comparison for fresh detail.',
'evidence_gap_missing_reason_body' => ':count affected subjects were counted for this reason, but detailed rows were not recorded for this run.',
'evidence_gap_diagnostics_heading' => 'Baseline compare evidence',
'evidence_gap_diagnostics_description' => 'Raw diagnostics remain available for support and deep troubleshooting after the operator summary and searchable detail.',
'evidence_gap_policy_type' => 'Policy type',
'evidence_gap_subject_key' => 'Subject key',
'evidence_gap_table_empty_heading' => 'No recorded gap rows match this view',
'evidence_gap_table_empty_description' => 'Adjust the current search or filters to review other affected subjects.',
// Comparing state
'comparing_indicator' => 'Comparing…',
// Why-no-findings explanations
'no_findings_all_clear' => 'All clear',
'no_findings_coverage_warnings' => 'Coverage warnings',
'no_findings_evidence_gaps' => 'Evidence gaps',
'no_findings_default' => 'No findings',
// Coverage warning banner
'coverage_warning_title' => 'Comparison completed with warnings',
'coverage_unproven_body' => 'Coverage proof was missing or unreadable for the last comparison run, so findings were suppressed for safety.',
'coverage_incomplete_body' => 'Findings were skipped for :count policy :types due to incomplete coverage.',
'coverage_uncovered_label' => 'Uncovered: :list',
// Failed banner
'failed_title' => 'Comparison Failed',
'failed_body_default' => 'The last baseline comparison failed. Review the run details or retry.',
// Critical drift banner
'critical_drift_title' => 'Critical Drift Detected',
'critical_drift_body' => 'The current tenant state deviates from baseline :profile. :count high-severity :findings require immediate attention.',
// Empty states
'empty_no_tenant' => 'No Tenant Selected',
'empty_no_assignment' => 'No Baseline Assigned',
'empty_no_snapshot' => 'No Snapshot Available',
// Findings section
'findings_description' => 'The tenant configuration drifted from the baseline profile.',
'rbac_summary_title' => 'Intune RBAC Role Definitions',
'rbac_summary_description' => 'Role Assignments are not included in this baseline compare release.',
'rbac_summary_compared' => 'Compared',
'rbac_summary_unchanged' => 'Unchanged',
'rbac_summary_modified' => 'Modified',
'rbac_summary_missing' => 'Missing',
'rbac_summary_unexpected' => 'Unexpected',
// No drift
'no_drift_title' => 'No Drift Detected',
'no_drift_body' => 'The tenant configuration matches the baseline profile. Everything looks good.',
// Coverage warnings (no findings)
'coverage_warnings_title' => 'Coverage Warnings',
'coverage_warnings_body' => 'The last comparison completed with warnings and produced no drift findings. Run Inventory Sync again to establish full coverage before interpreting results.',
// Idle
'idle_title' => 'Ready to Compare',
// Buttons
'button_view_run' => 'View run',
'button_view_failed_run' => 'View failed run',
'button_view_findings' => 'View all findings',
'button_review_last_run' => 'Review last run',
];