ahmido
cd811cff4f
## Summary - replace broad substring-based masking with a shared exact/path-based secret classifier and workspace-scoped fingerprint hashing - persist protected snapshot metadata on `policy_versions` and keep secret-only changes visible in compare, drift, restore, review, verification, and ops surfaces - add Spec 120 artifacts, audit documentation, and focused Pest regression coverage for snapshot, audit, verification, review-pack, and notification behavior ## Validation - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Intune/PolicySnapshotRedactionTest.php tests/Feature/Intune/PolicySnapshotFingerprintIsolationTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackRedactionIntegrityTest.php tests/Feature/OpsUx/OperationRunNotificationRedactionTest.php tests/Feature/Verification/VerificationReportViewerDbOnlyTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Spec / checklist status | Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status | |-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------| | requirements.md | 16 | 16 | 0 | ✓ PASS | - `tasks.md`: T001-T032 complete - `tasks.md`: T033 manual quickstart validation is still open and noted for follow-up ## Filament / platform notes - Livewire v4 compliance is unchanged - no panel provider changes; `bootstrap/providers.php` remains the registration location - no new globally searchable resources were introduced, so global search requirements are unchanged - no new destructive Filament actions were added - no new Filament assets were added; no `filament:assets` deployment change is required ## Testing coverage touched - snapshot persistence and fingerprint isolation - compare/drift protected-change evidence - audit, verification, review-pack, ops-failure, and notification sanitization - viewer/read-only Filament presentation updates Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #146
37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Secret Redaction Hardening & Snapshot Data Integrity
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-06
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated against the repository spec template after correcting the feature number from `001` to `120`.
|
|
- No clarification questions are required before `/speckit.plan`.
|
|
- Existing Filament surfaces are referenced only to document impact; the spec does not introduce new user workflows or dependencies.
|