TenantAtlas/specs/136-admin-canonical-tenant/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 45a804970e feat: complete admin canonical tenant rollout (#165)
## Summary
- complete Spec 136 canonical admin tenant rollout across admin-visible and shared Filament surfaces
- add the shared panel-aware tenant resolver helper, persisted filter-state synchronization, and admin navigation segregation for tenant-sensitive resources
- expand regression, guard, and parity coverage for admin-path tenant resolution, stale filters, workspace-wide tenant-default surfaces, and panel split behavior

## Validation
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/AdminTenantResolverGuardTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/TableStatePersistenceTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact --filter='CanonicalAdminTenantFilterState|PolicyResource|BackupSchedule|BackupSet|FindingResource|BaselineCompareLanding|RestoreRunResource|InventoryItemResource|PolicyVersionResource|ProviderConnectionResource|TenantDiagnostics|InventoryCoverage|InventoryKpiHeader|AuditLog|EntraGroup'`
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved with Filament v5.
- Provider registration remains unchanged in `bootstrap/providers.php`.
- `PolicyResource` and `PolicyVersionResource` have admin global search disabled explicitly; `EntraGroupResource` keeps admin-aware scoped search with a View page.
- Destructive and governance-sensitive actions retain existing confirmation and authorization behavior while using canonical tenant parity.
- No new assets were introduced, so deployment asset strategy is unchanged and does not add new `filament:assets` work.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #165
2026-03-13 08:09:20 +00:00

1.4 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Admin Panel Canonical Tenant Resolution Full Rollout

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-11
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed on 2026-03-11.
  • No unresolved clarification markers remain.
  • Product-specific source-of-truth names are retained only where they define the required tenant-resolution rule and panel separation for this feature.
  • Spec is ready for /speckit.plan.