ahmido
92f39d9749
## Summary - introduce a shared reason-translation contract with envelopes, presenter helpers, fallback handling, and provider translation support - adopt translated operator-facing reason presentation across operation runs, notifications, provider guidance, tenant operability, and RBAC-related surfaces - add Spec 157 design artifacts and targeted regression coverage for translation quality, diagnostics retention, and authorization-safe guidance ## Validation - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Architecture/ReasonTranslationPrimarySurfaceGuardTest.php tests/Unit/Support/ReasonTranslation/ReasonResolutionEnvelopeTest.php tests/Unit/Support/ReasonTranslation/ExecutionDenialReasonTranslationTest.php tests/Unit/Support/ReasonTranslation/TenantOperabilityReasonTranslationTest.php tests/Unit/Support/ReasonTranslation/RbacReasonTranslationTest.php tests/Unit/Support/ReasonTranslation/ProviderReasonTranslationTest.php tests/Feature/Notifications/OperationRunNotificationTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/OperationRunBlockedExecutionPresentationTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/TenantlessOperationRunViewerTest.php tests/Feature/ReasonTranslation/GovernanceReasonPresentationTest.php tests/Feature/Authorization/ReasonTranslationScopeSafetyTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/OperationRunBlockedSpec081Test.php tests/Feature/ProviderConnections/ProviderOperationBlockedGuidanceSpec081Test.php tests/Feature/ProviderConnections/ProviderGatewayRuntimeSmokeSpec081Test.php` ## Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance remains unchanged within the existing Filament v5 stack. - No new panel was added; provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php`. - No new globally searchable resource was introduced. - No new destructive action family was introduced. - No new assets were added; the existing `filament:assets` deployment behavior remains unchanged. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #187
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Operator Reason Code Translation and Humanization Contract
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-22
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed after correcting the feature number to `157` and confirming the spec stays bounded to the shared reason-translation contract rather than downstream domain implementation work. |