ahmido
1655cc481e
## Summary - migrate provider connections to the canonical three-dimension state model: lifecycle via `is_enabled`, consent via `consent_status`, and verification via `verification_status` - remove legacy provider status and health badge paths, update admin and system directory surfaces, and align onboarding, consent callback, verification, resolver, and mutation flows with the new model - add the Spec 188 artifact set, schema migrations, guard coverage, and expanded provider-state tests across admin, system, onboarding, verification, and rendering paths ## Verification - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Auth/SystemPanelAuthTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantGlobalSearchLifecycleScopeTest.php tests/Feature/ProviderConnections/ProviderConnectionEnableDisableTest.php tests/Feature/ProviderConnections/ProviderConnectionTruthCleanupSpec179Test.php` - integrated browser smoke: validated admin provider list/detail/edit, tenant provider summary, system directory tenant detail, provider-connection search exclusion, and cleaned up the temporary smoke record afterward ## Filament / implementation notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance: preserved; this change targets Filament v5 on Livewire v4 and does not introduce older APIs - Provider registration location: unchanged; Laravel 11+ panel providers remain registered in `bootstrap/providers.php` - Globally searchable resources: `ProviderConnectionResource` remains intentionally excluded from global search; tenant global search remains enabled and continues to resolve to view pages - Destructive actions: no new destructive action surface was introduced without confirmation or authorization; existing capability checks continue to gate provider mutations - Asset strategy: unchanged; no new Filament assets were added, so deploy behavior for `php artisan filament:assets` remains unchanged - Testing plan covered: system auth, tenant global search, provider lifecycle enable/disable behavior, and provider truth cleanup cutover behavior Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #219
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Canonical Provider Connection State Cleanup
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-09
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated after first draft update on 2026-04-09.
|
|
- No clarification markers were required because the feature description explicitly defined scope, cutover policy, canonical truth separation, and non-goals.
|
|
- Route names and domain field names remain only where the repo template and product vocabulary require them for unambiguous scope and surface definition. |