ahmido
e15d80cca5
## Summary - implement Spec 224 findings notifications and escalation v1 on top of the existing alerts and Filament database notification infrastructure - add finding assignment, reopen, due soon, and overdue event handling with direct recipient routing, dedupe, and optional external alert fan-out - extend alert rule and alert delivery surfaces plus add the Spec 224 planning bundle and candidate-list promotion cleanup ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsNotificationEventTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsNotificationRoutingTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Alerts/FindingsAlertRuleIntegrationTest.php tests/Feature/Alerts/SlaDueAlertTest.php tests/Feature/Notifications/FindingNotificationLinkTest.php` ## Filament / Platform Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved - provider registration remains unchanged in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - no globally searchable resource behavior changed in this feature - no new destructive action was introduced - asset strategy is unchanged and the existing `cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets` deploy step remains sufficient ## Manual Smoke Note - integrated-browser smoke testing confirmed the new alert rule event options, notification drawer entries, alert delivery history row, and tenant finding detail route on the active Sail host - local notification deep links currently resolve from `APP_URL`, so a local `localhost` vs `127.0.0.1:8081` host mismatch can break the browser session if the app is opened on a different host/port combination Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #261
35 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Findings Notifications & Escalation v1
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-22
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated against the existing findings workflow, ownership, inbox, intake, and alerts foundations.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain. |