Kurzbeschreibung Implementiert Feature 055 — Ops‑UX Constitution Rollout v1.3.0. Behebt: globales BulkOperationProgress-Widget benötigt keinen manuellen Refresh mehr; ETA/Elapsed aktualisieren korrekt; Widget verschwindet automatisch. Verbesserungen: zuverlässiges polling (Alpine factory + Livewire fallback), sofortiger Enqueue‑Signal-Dispatch, Failure‑Message‑Sanitization, neue Guard‑ und Regressionstests, Specs/Tasks aktualisiert. Was geändert wurde (Auszug) InventoryLanding.php bulk-operation-progress.blade.php OperationUxPresenter.php SyncRestoreRunToOperationRun.php PolicyResource.php PolicyVersionResource.php RestoreRunResource.php tests/Feature/OpsUx/* (PollerRegistration, TerminalNotificationFailureMessageTest, CanonicalViewRunLinksTest, OperationCatalogCoverageTest, UnknownOperationTypeLabelTest) InventorySyncButtonTest.php tasks.md Tests Neue Tests hinzugefügt; php artisan test --group=ops-ux lokal grün (alle relevanten Tests laufen). How to verify manually Auf Branch wechseln: 055-ops-ux-rollout In Filament: Inventory → Sync (oder relevante Bulk‑Aktion) auslösen. Beobachten: Progress‑Widget erscheint sofort, ETA/Elapsed aktualisiert, Widget verschwindet nach Fertigstellung ohne Browser‑Refresh. Optional: ./vendor/bin/sail exec app php artisan test --filter=OpsUx oder php artisan test --group=ops-ux Besonderheiten / Hinweise Einzelne, synchrone Policy‑Actions (ignore/restore/PolicyVersion single archive/restore/forceDelete) sind absichtlich inline und erzeugen kein OperationRun. Bulk‑Aktionen und restore.execute werden als Runs modelliert. Wenn gewünscht, kann ich die inline‑Actions auf OperationRunService umstellen, damit sie in Monitoring → Operations sichtbar werden. Remote: Branch ist bereits gepusht (origin/055-ops-ux-rollout). PR kann in Gitea erstellt werden. Links Specs & tasks: tasks.md Monitoring page: Operations.php Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@adsmac.local> Reviewed-on: #64
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Ops-UX Constitution Rollout (v1.3.0 Alignment)
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-01-18 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- All items pass; spec is ready for
/speckit.plan.