ahmido
210cf5ce8b
Implements 064-auth-structure (Auth Structure v1.0): Adds platform_users + PlatformUser identity (factory + seeder) for platform operators Introduces platform auth guard/provider in auth.php Adds a dedicated Filament v5 System panel at system using guard platform (custom login + dashboard) Enforces strict cross-scope isolation between /admin and system (deny-as-404) Adds platform capability gating (platform.access_system_panel, platform.use_break_glass) + gates in AuthServiceProvider Implements audited break-glass mode (enter/exit/expire), banner via render hook, feature flag + TTL config Removes legacy users.is_platform_superadmin runtime usage and adds an architecture test to prevent regressions Updates tenant membership pivot usage where needed (tenant_memberships) Testing: vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Auth (28 passed) vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty Notes: Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compatible. Panel providers registered in providers.php. Destructive actions use ->action(...) + ->requiresConfirmation() where applicable. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@MacBookPro.fritz.box> Reviewed-on: #77
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Auth Structure v1.0: Panel & Identity Separation
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: Tuesday, January 27, 2026
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
All checks passed. The specification is comprehensive and ready for the planning phase. The provided input was exceptionally detailed, leaving no room for ambiguity.
|