ahmido
b6343d5c3a
Implements workspace-scoped managed tenant onboarding wizard (Filament v5 / Livewire v4) with strict RBAC (404/403 semantics), resumable sessions, provider connection selection/creation, verification OperationRun, and optional bootstrap. Removes legacy onboarding entrypoints and adds Pest coverage + spec artifacts (073). ## Summary <!-- Kurz: Was ändert sich und warum? --> ## Spec-Driven Development (SDD) - [ ] Es gibt eine Spec unter `specs/<NNN>-<feature>/` - [ ] Enthaltene Dateien: `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `spec.md` - [ ] Spec beschreibt Verhalten/Acceptance Criteria (nicht nur Implementation) - [ ] Wenn sich Anforderungen während der Umsetzung geändert haben: Spec/Plan/Tasks wurden aktualisiert ## Implementation - [ ] Implementierung entspricht der Spec - [ ] Edge cases / Fehlerfälle berücksichtigt - [ ] Keine unbeabsichtigten Änderungen außerhalb des Scopes ## Tests - [ ] Tests ergänzt/aktualisiert (Pest/PHPUnit) - [ ] Relevante Tests lokal ausgeführt (`./vendor/bin/sail artisan test` oder `php artisan test`) ## Migration / Config / Ops (falls relevant) - [ ] Migration(en) enthalten und getestet - [ ] Rollback bedacht (rückwärts kompatibel, sichere Migration) - [ ] Neue Env Vars dokumentiert (`.env.example` / Doku) - [ ] Queue/cron/storage Auswirkungen geprüft ## UI (Filament/Livewire) (falls relevant) - [ ] UI-Flows geprüft - [ ] Screenshots/Notizen hinzugefügt ## Notes <!-- Links, Screenshots, Follow-ups, offene Punkte --> Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@adsmac.fritz.box> Reviewed-on: #88
37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Unified Managed Tenant Onboarding Wizard (073)
|
||
|
||
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
||
**Created**: 2026-02-03
|
||
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
||
|
||
## Content Quality
|
||
|
||
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
||
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
||
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
||
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
||
|
||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||
|
||
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
||
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
||
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
||
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
||
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
||
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
||
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
||
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
||
|
||
## Feature Readiness
|
||
|
||
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
||
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
||
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
||
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
||
|
||
## Notes
|
||
|
||
- All checklist items pass.
|
||
- The constitution-alignment paragraphs reference platform primitives (e.g., `OperationRun`) and domain integrations (e.g., Microsoft Graph) as required by this repository’s constitution.
|
||
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
|