TenantAtlas/specs/123-operations-auto-refresh/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 4db73e872e Spec 123: operations auto-refresh pass (#149)
## Summary
- add conditional polling support for the tenantless operation run viewer and tenant review pack card
- add focused Pest coverage for active vs terminal polling behavior and related review pack access regressions
- add the full Spec Kit artifacts for Spec 123, including spec, plan, research, data model, contracts, quickstart, tasks, and checklist

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/OpsUx/RunDetailPollingStopsOnTerminalTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/TenantlessOperationRunViewerTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackGenerationTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackRbacTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- Manual QA task `T014` in the Spec Kit checklist remains to be completed outside this automated flow.
- Livewire v4.0+ compliance is unchanged.
- No panel provider changes were made; provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php`.
- No global-search behavior was changed.
- No destructive actions were added or modified.
- No new Filament assets were introduced; existing deployment expectations for `php artisan filament:assets` remain unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #149
2026-03-08 11:11:26 +00:00

1.3 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Operations Auto-Refresh Pass

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-08
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated after the initial draft. The spec stays focused on user-facing monitoring behavior, bounded scope, and measurable refresh outcomes.
  • Constitution-alignment sections describe unchanged operational and authorization guardrails without expanding feature scope.