ahmido
417df4f9aa
## Summary
- centralize tenant operability into a lane-aware, actor-aware policy boundary
- align selector eligibility, administrative discoverability, remembered context, tenant-bound routes, and canonical run viewers
- add focused Pest coverage plus Spec 148 artifacts and final polish task completion
## Validation
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Tenants/TenantOperabilityServiceTest.php tests/Unit/Tenants/TenantOperabilityOutcomeTest.php tests/Feature/Workspaces/ChooseTenantPageTest.php tests/Feature/Workspaces/SelectTenantControllerTest.php tests/Feature/TenantRBAC/ArchivedTenantRouteAccessTest.php tests/Feature/TenantRBAC/TenantRouteDenyAsNotFoundTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/TenantlessOperationRunViewerTest.php tests/Feature/OpsUx/OperateHubShellTest.php tests/Feature/Rbac/TenantLifecycleActionVisibilityTest.php tests/Feature/TenantRBAC/TenantSwitcherScopeTest.php tests/Feature/Rbac/TenantResourceAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/ManagedTenantsLandingLifecycleTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantGlobalSearchLifecycleScopeTest.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/OnboardingDraftLifecycleTest.php tests/Feature/Onboarding/OnboardingDraftAuthorizationTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- manual browser smoke checks on `/admin/choose-tenant`, `/admin/tenants`, `/admin/onboarding`, `/admin/onboarding/{draft}`, and `/admin/operations/{run}`
## Filament / platform notes
- Livewire v4 compliance preserved
- panel provider registration unchanged in `bootstrap/providers.php`
- Tenant resource global search remains backed by existing view/edit pages and is now separated from active-only selector eligibility
- destructive actions remain action closures with confirmation and authorization enforcement
- no asset pipeline changes and no new `filament:assets` deployment requirement
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #177
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Central Tenant Operability Policy
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-17
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation completed after first draft review.
|
|
- No clarification questions were required because lifecycle expectations, affected routes, ownership boundaries, and policy outcomes were explicit in the feature brief.
|
|
- Spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`. |