ahmido
a4f2629493
## Summary - add the tenant review domain with tenant-scoped review library, canonical workspace review register, lifecycle actions, and review-derived executive pack export - extend review pack, operations, audit, capability, and badge infrastructure to support review composition, publication, export, and recurring review cycles - add product backlog and audit documentation updates for tenant review and semantic-clarity follow-up candidates ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact --filter="TenantReview"` - `CI=1 vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact` ## Notes - Livewire v4+ compliant via existing Filament v5 stack - panel providers remain in `bootstrap/providers.php` via existing Laravel 12 structure; no provider registration moved to `bootstrap/app.php` - `TenantReviewResource` is not globally searchable, so the Filament edit/view global-search constraint does not apply - destructive review actions use action handlers with confirmation and policy enforcement Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #185
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Review Layer
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-20
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- This spec intentionally separates tenant-scoped recurring review workflows and executive packs from the later framework-oriented Compliance Readiness layer.
|
|
- Workspace scope is limited to canonical review register behavior in this slice; portfolio dashboards and SLA reporting remain separate future work. |