TenantAtlas/docs/ui-ux-enterprise-audit/target-images/target/provider-readiness-target.md
ahmido 3eff4d8579 Spec 325: add screenshot-anchored strategic target images (#385)
## Summary
- add the Spec 325 artifacts for screenshot-anchored strategic target images
- update the UI/UX enterprise audit documents to capture strategic surfaces and grouped follow-up candidates
- add supporting follow-up specs, target experience briefs, and target image assets for the audit workflow

## Testing
- not run (documentation/spec artifact changes only)

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #385
2026-05-18 07:18:13 +00:00

2.1 KiB

Provider Readiness Target Image Sidecar

Not Implementation Truth

This target image is visual direction only. It is not runtime implementation truth, not a product capability claim, and not a substitute for later repo, RBAC, data, audit, and browser verification.

Item Link
Source route /admin/provider-connections plus create/detail family
Source screenshot ../../screenshots/desktop/ui-009-provider-connections.png
Source page report ../../page-reports/ui-009-provider-connections.md
Target brief ../../target-experience-briefs/provider-readiness.md
Dark target image provider-readiness-target-dark.png
Light target image provider-readiness-target-light.png

Transformation Table

Current state Target direction
Provider table needs stronger readiness hierarchy. Readiness, permission gaps, verification, and next action lead.
Raw integration details can dominate. Diagnostics are collapsed and redacted.
Dangerous actions need safety posture. Rotate, disconnect, and re-consent actions require confirmation/audit notes.

Repo-Truth Classification

Element in target image Classification Implementation note
Provider route and screenshot repo-verified Existing route/screenshot anchor.
ProviderConnection model repo-verified Existing model.
Permission readiness summary plausible-existing Needs mapping to existing contracts/permissions.
Capability impact copy foundation-only Requires deterministic capability mapping.
Multi-provider neutral language spec-only Product direction for later implementation.

Conceptual Elements Requiring Verification

  • Permission gap source
  • Capability impact mapping
  • Credential lifecycle status
  • Re-consent and rotation action rules

Implementation Notes

Later implementation should keep provider-specific semantics bounded and never expose secrets or raw credential payloads.

Do Not Implement Blindly

Do not create a provider framework or new provider taxonomy from this image.