TenantAtlas/specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/plan.md

# Implementation Plan: Product Truth / Docs Drift Reconciliation

**Branch**: `310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation` | **Date**: 2026-05-15 | **Spec**: `specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/spec.md`
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/spec.md`

## Summary

Prepare and implement a documentation-only reconciliation pass after Specs 307, 308, and 309. The implementation must inventory drift first, then update only product-truth markdown where repo evidence proves the current docs are stale, too optimistic, too conservative, wrong-status, wrong-priority, superseded, historical, or unclear.

## Technical Context

**Language/Version**: Markdown documentation only; Laravel runtime is present but out of scope
**Primary Dependencies**: Git, Spec Kit markdown artifacts, product docs
**Storage**: N/A - no database or persisted runtime changes
**Testing**: Docs-only validation commands
**Validation Lanes**: docs/prep validation
**Target Platform**: Repository documentation
**Project Type**: Laravel monorepo with docs/specs reconciliation only
**Performance Goals**: N/A
**Constraints**: No runtime code, tests, migrations, policies, services, Filament pages, routes, config, lang files, queue jobs, or UI components
**Scale/Scope**: Targeted docs reconciliation across product docs and this Spec 310 package

## UI / Surface Guardrail Plan

- **Guardrail scope**: no operator-facing surface change.
- **Native vs custom classification summary**: N/A.
- **Shared-family relevance**: product-truth docs only.
- **State layers in scope**: none.
- **Audience modes in scope**: N/A.
- **Decision/diagnostic/raw hierarchy plan**: N/A.
- **Raw/support gating plan**: N/A.
- **One-primary-action / duplicate-truth control**: N/A.
- **Handling modes by drift class or surface**: documentation-required review for stale product status claims; report-only for files with no concrete drift.
- **Repository-signal treatment**: review-mandatory for any claim that promotes a capability to repo-real, fast sellable, sellable, historical, or security-hardening completed.
- **Special surface test profiles**: N/A.
- **Required tests or manual smoke**: N/A.
- **Exception path and spread control**: none.
- **Active feature PR close-out entry**: Product Truth / Docs Drift Reconciliation.

## Shared Pattern & System Fit

- **Cross-cutting feature marker**: no runtime feature.
- **Systems touched**: product docs and Spec Kit artifacts only.
- **Shared abstractions reused**: existing ledger, roadmap, candidate queue, and Spec Kit close-out patterns.
- **New abstraction introduced? why?**: none.
- **Why the existing abstraction was sufficient or insufficient**: The existing docs are the correct product-truth homes; they only need reconciliation.
- **Bounded deviation / spread control**: none.

## OperationRun UX Impact

- **Touches OperationRun start/completion/link UX?**: no runtime UX change.
- **Central contract reused**: N/A.
- **Delegated UX behaviors**: N/A.
- **Surface-owned behavior kept local**: N/A.
- **Queued DB-notification policy**: N/A.
- **Terminal notification path**: N/A.
- **Exception path**: none.

## Provider Boundary & Portability Fit

- **Shared provider/platform boundary touched?**: docs terminology only.
- **Provider-owned seams**: Microsoft tenant / Intune references where docs intentionally describe Microsoft-provider truth.
- **Platform-core seams**: Workspace, ManagedEnvironment, governance artifact, Decision Register, RBAC, customer-safe review consumption, and product status labels.
- **Neutral platform terms / contracts preserved**: Use `ManagedEnvironment` or `environment` where product-domain intent is provider-neutral.
- **Retained provider-specific semantics and why**: Keep `tenant` where it names Microsoft tenants, historical spec titles, existing code/test names, or repo-real domain terminology.
- **Bounded extraction or follow-up path**: document-in-feature for unclear terminology that needs future product decision.

## Constitution Check

- Inventory-first: PASS. No inventory/runtime truth changes.
- Read/write separation: PASS. Documentation-only.
- Graph contract path: PASS. No Graph calls.
- Deterministic capabilities: PASS. No capability derivation changes.
- RBAC-UX: PASS. Runtime RBAC is not changed; Spec 309 status must be documented accurately.
- Workspace isolation: PASS. No route/data changes.
- Tenant isolation: PASS. No route/data changes.
- Run observability: PASS. No OperationRun lifecycle changes.
- OperationRun start UX: PASS. No start/completion/link UX changes.
- Test governance: PASS. Docs-only, no test-suite impact.
- Proportionality: PASS. No new structure beyond markdown prep artifacts.
- No premature abstraction: PASS. No abstraction introduced.
- Persisted truth: PASS. No new persisted runtime truth.
- Behavioral state: PASS. No runtime state introduced.
- UI semantics: PASS. No UI semantics framework introduced.
- Shared pattern first: PASS. Existing docs locations are reused.
- Provider boundary: PASS if terminology changes remain evidence-based and targeted.
- V1 explicitness / few layers: PASS. Direct markdown reconciliation only.
- Spec discipline / bloat check: PASS. This cleanup spec groups related product-truth drift in one bounded pass.
- Filament-native UI: PASS. No Filament surface changes.
- UI/UX surface taxonomy: PASS. No UI surface changes.

## Test Governance Check

- **Test purpose / classification by changed surface**: N/A - docs-only.
- **Affected validation lanes**: docs/prep validation.
- **Why this lane mix is the narrowest sufficient proof**: Runtime behavior is not changed. Changed-file and whitespace validation prove the implementation boundary.
- **Narrowest proving command(s)**:
  - `git status --short --branch`
  - `git diff --stat`
  - `git diff --name-only`
  - `git diff --check`
  - `git diff --name-only | grep -vE '^(docs/|specs/|README\.md|AGENTS\.md|constitution\.md|\.specify/)' || true`
- **Fixture / helper / factory / seed / context cost risks**: none.
- **Expensive defaults or shared helper growth introduced?**: no.
- **Heavy-family additions, promotions, or visibility changes**: none.
- **Surface-class relief / special coverage rule**: N/A.
- **Closing validation and reviewer handoff**: Reviewer should verify no forbidden runtime path changed and every major status update cites repo evidence.
- **Budget / baseline / trend follow-up**: none.
- **Review-stop questions**: scope creep into runtime files; overclaiming product maturity; rewriting completed specs.
- **Escalation path**: none unless runtime contradiction is discovered; then document as follow-up-spec or decision needed.
- **Active feature PR close-out entry**: Product Truth / Docs Drift Reconciliation.
- **Why no dedicated follow-up spec is needed**: The docs cleanup is bounded; future product work is listed as separate next specs.

## Project Structure

### Documentation (this feature)

```text
specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/
├── spec.md
├── plan.md
├── tasks.md
└── checklists/
    └── requirements.md
```

### Product Docs Likely Affected In Implementation

```text
docs/product/implementation-ledger.md
docs/product/spec-candidates.md
docs/product/roadmap.md
```

### Supporting Docs To Check, Edit Only If Concrete Drift Exists

```text
README.md
AGENTS.md
.specify/memory/constitution.md
```

`docs/product/product-vision.md` was requested in the user draft but is not present in the current repo scan. If it appears before implementation, check it for concrete drift.

### Forbidden Runtime Paths

```text
apps/platform/app/**
apps/platform/database/**
apps/platform/routes/**
apps/platform/resources/**/*.php
apps/platform/resources/**/*.blade.php
apps/platform/tests/**
apps/platform/config/**
apps/platform/lang/**
```

**Structure Decision**: Documentation-only feature package plus targeted product-doc edits in the later implementation step.

## Complexity Tracking

| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|---|---|---|
| None | N/A | N/A |

## Proportionality Review

- **Current operator problem**: stale product-truth docs can misdirect the next spec and overclaim or underclaim maturity.
- **Existing structure is insufficient because**: the drift crosses ledger, roadmap, candidate queue, and completed spec evidence.
- **Narrowest correct implementation**: markdown-only reconciliation with drift inventory and validation guard.
- **Ownership cost created**: minimal documentation maintenance.
- **Alternative intentionally rejected**: broad roadmap rewrite or runtime correction work.
- **Release truth**: current documentation truth after Specs 307-309.

## Phase 0: Preparation Evidence

Prep scan found these repo signals:

- Spec 307 has completed task markers for builder/page/auth/boundary/browser validation in `specs/307-decision-register-evidence-operationrun-link-polish/tasks.md`.
- Spec 308 records implementation status, changed files, validation results, no-migration/no-asset status, browser smoke, and remaining out-of-scope gaps in `specs/308-decision-register-summary-review-pack/plan.md`.
- Spec 309 records RBAC inventory, confirmed membership-management contradictions fixed, validation results, and runtime/Filament compliance in `specs/309-rbac-role-matrix-access-boundary-audit/tasks.md`.
- Runtime evidence exists for Spec 308 `governance_package.decision_summary` and review-pack inclusion in `apps/platform/app/Services/EnvironmentReviews/EnvironmentReviewComposer.php`, `apps/platform/app/Jobs/GenerateReviewPackJob.php`, `apps/platform/tests/Feature/EnvironmentReview/EnvironmentReviewExecutivePackTest.php`, and `apps/platform/tests/Feature/ReviewPack/EnvironmentReviewDerivedReviewPackTest.php`.
- Runtime evidence exists for Spec 309 panel access hardening in `apps/platform/app/Models/User.php` and RBAC tests under `apps/platform/tests/Feature/Rbac/`.

## Phase 1: Read-Only Drift Inventory

Before editing product docs, refresh the prep-time inventory from `spec.md` against current files.

Required reads:

```text
docs/product/implementation-ledger.md
docs/product/spec-candidates.md
docs/product/roadmap.md
README.md
AGENTS.md
.specify/memory/constitution.md
specs/307-decision-register-evidence-operationrun-link-polish/spec.md
specs/307-decision-register-evidence-operationrun-link-polish/plan.md
specs/307-decision-register-evidence-operationrun-link-polish/tasks.md
specs/308-decision-register-summary-review-pack/spec.md
specs/308-decision-register-summary-review-pack/plan.md
specs/308-decision-register-summary-review-pack/tasks.md
specs/309-rbac-role-matrix-access-boundary-audit/spec.md
specs/309-rbac-role-matrix-access-boundary-audit/plan.md
specs/309-rbac-role-matrix-access-boundary-audit/tasks.md
```

Search targets:

```text
Decision Register
Decision Register v1
approval workflow
proof links
OperationRun links
customer-safe Decision Summary
Review Pack Inclusion
Customer Review Workspace
RBAC role matrix
access boundary
Manager membership management
Tenant membership management
Workspace membership management
/admin
/system
Tenant vs ManagedEnvironment terminology
Productization status
sellable / fast sellable / foundation-only labels
```

Required inventory format:

| Document | Section / Line / Term | Current statement | Repo truth | Drift type | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` | Scoped maintenance / current product position | Ledger is aligned only through Spec 307 and says Decision-Register review-pack/customer-safe follow-through still remains. | Spec 308 records completed implementation and validation in `specs/308-decision-register-summary-review-pack/plan.md`; runtime evidence exists in `apps/platform/app/Services/EnvironmentReviews/EnvironmentReviewComposer.php`, `apps/platform/app/Jobs/GenerateReviewPackJob.php`, and review-pack/review tests. | stale / status wrong | Add Spec 310 maintenance note and mark Spec 308 customer-safe Decision Summary and Review Pack inclusion as repo-real. |
| `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` | Decision Register capability/status rows | Decision Register is not Greenfield after Spec 306/307, but customer-safe inclusion is still treated as a follow-up. | Spec 265 introduced the operator register, Spec 306 reconciled it as non-Greenfield, Spec 307 added proof/run link polish, and Spec 308 carried customer-safe summary into reviews and review packs. | too conservative / historical completed | Keep operator register as repo-real but not fully productized; add proof/run link and customer-safe summary/review-pack repo-real classifications. |
| `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` | Customer Review Workspace row | Workspace is marked sellable while text elsewhere says final customer-safe productization remains open. | Existing workspace and released-review detail are repo-real, but Spec 308 explicitly avoids implementing a complete customer portal/workspace v1 and leaves broader customer-safe consumption open. | too optimistic | Keep repo-real/fast-sellable foundation, but mark v1 completion as open and avoid full sellable wording. |
| `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` | RBAC / access boundary status | Capability-first RBAC is foundation-only; Spec 309 hardening is not reflected. | Spec 309 tasks record Manager membership-management removal, admin/system panel access hardening, and focused tests in `specs/309-rbac-role-matrix-access-boundary-audit/tasks.md`; runtime evidence is in `apps/platform/app/Services/Auth/WorkspaceRoleCapabilityMap.php` and `apps/platform/app/Models/User.php`. | stale / security-hardening completed | Add security-hardening completed status while keeping Support Access Governance separate. |
| `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` | Open gaps / manual promotions | `decision-register-review-pack-inclusion` and `decision-register-customer-safe-summary` remain recommended promotions. | These were promoted and completed as Spec 308. Remaining work is Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion and Decision-Based Governance Inbox v1. | historical / completed | Remove those as active gaps and replace with current productization gaps. |
| `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` | Scoped maintenance / deep research notes | Candidate queue still says later customer-safe consumption/review-pack inclusion remains after proof/run link polish. | Spec 308 is complete and repo-real. Remaining need is broader Customer Review Workspace completion and Decision-Based Governance Inbox, not the completed 308 slice. | stale / priority wrong | Update candidate notes and recommended ordering. |
| `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` | `Decision Register Customer-Safe Summary / Review-Pack Inclusion` candidate | Candidate is listed as active manual-promotion work. | Candidate was promoted to and completed by `specs/308-decision-register-summary-review-pack/`. | historical / completed | Mark historical/completed and remove from active next work. |
| `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` | Promoted / completed list | Promoted list does not include Specs 306, 307, 308, or 309 in the current completion trail. | Specs 306-309 now define Decision Register reconciliation, proof/run link polish, customer-safe review-pack inclusion, and RBAC hardening history. | too conservative / historical completed | Add these specs to the promoted/completed history. |
| `docs/product/roadmap.md` | Current priority order | Roadmap still orders artifact lifecycle, commercial maturity, PSA, and localization ahead of the new post-309 customer-facing path. | After 307-309, next priority should be Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion, Localization v1 Customer-facing Surfaces, Decision-Based Governance Inbox v1, Commercial Entitlements, Cross-Tenant Promotion, Artifact Lifecycle, PSA Handoff, and Private AI Governance. | priority wrong | Reorder near-term roadmap without broad rewrite. |
| `docs/product/roadmap.md` | Decision Register follow-up wording | Roadmap describes remaining Decision Register customer-safe/review-pack follow-through as open. | Spec 308 completed customer-safe Decision Summary and Review Pack inclusion; remaining gap is broader Decision-Based Governance Inbox and Customer Review Workspace completion. | stale / superseded | Replace completed follow-up wording with current gap wording. |
| `docs/product/roadmap.md` | RBAC audit / access boundary posture | Roadmap does not clearly state Spec 309 is completed scoped hardening. | Spec 309 completed RBAC role matrix and panel access boundary hardening; Support Access Governance remains a separate open candidate. | status wrong | Add post-309 truth and keep support access separate. |
| `README.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `.specify/memory/constitution.md`, `docs/product/product-vision.md` | Supporting docs | No concrete drift found in the checked supporting docs; `docs/product/product-vision.md` is absent. | Current drift is product-doc scope. The constitution already says closed specs should not be retroactively rewritten by default. | no drift | Do not edit unless validation later exposes a direct contradiction. |

### Completed / Historical Items

- Spec 307 Decision Register Evidence / OperationRun Link Polish is completed historical work with repo-real proof/run link polish.
- Spec 308 Decision Register Customer-Safe Summary / Review-Pack Inclusion is completed historical work with repo-real `governance_package.decision_summary` and review-pack summary/export inclusion.
- Spec 309 RBAC Role Matrix / Access Boundary Audit is completed scoped security hardening. It does not close Support Access Governance.

### Still Open Product Gaps

- Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion remains the next customer-facing productization gap.
- Localization v1 Customer-facing Surfaces remains open even though platform localization foundations are repo-real.
- Decision-Based Governance Inbox v1 remains open as a broader operator governance workflow, not as a Decision Register rebuild.
- Commercial Entitlements / Billing-State Maturity, Cross-Tenant Compare / Promotion Execution, Governance Artifact Lifecycle / Retention, External Support Desk / PSA Handoff, and Private AI Execution Governance remain separate follow-ups.

### Proposed Minimal Docs Updates

- Update `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md` for Spec 310 maintenance, Spec 307/308/309 status, corrected Customer Review Workspace maturity, open gaps, and recommended promotions.
- Update `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` to mark completed 307/308/309 items historical/promoted and add the recommended next-spec sequence.
- Update `docs/product/roadmap.md` to reflect post-307/308/309 truth and the current priority order.
- Leave README, AGENTS, constitution, and absent product vision unchanged unless a later validation pass finds direct drift.

## Phase 2: Implementation Ledger Reconciliation

Update only stale status areas in `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`.

Required outcomes:

- Add a scoped maintenance note for Spec 310.
- Mark Spec 307 proof/run link polish as repo-real.
- Mark Spec 308 customer-safe Decision Summary and Review Pack inclusion as repo-real.
- Mark Spec 309 RBAC role/access-boundary hardening as `security-hardening completed` if repo evidence remains consistent.
- Update Decision Register status so it is not Greenfield and not overstated as fully productized.
- Update Customer Review Workspace status so v1 completion remains open unless repo evidence proves otherwise.
- Update open gaps and recommended promotions.
- Keep test-run language exact: repo-present tests are not the same as tests run in this branch.

## Phase 3: Spec Candidate Queue Reconciliation

Update `docs/product/spec-candidates.md` so completed/promoted items are not active next work.

Required outcomes:

- Move Spec 307 Decision Register Evidence / OperationRun Link Polish to historical/promoted/completed.
- Move Spec 308 Decision Register Customer-Safe Summary / Review-Pack Inclusion to historical/promoted/completed.
- Move Spec 309 RBAC Role Matrix & Access Boundary Audit to historical/promoted/completed if listed or implied as active.
- Remove or downgrade broad Decision Register v1 as active Greenfield.
- Keep Decision-Based Governance Inbox v1 open if still needed.
- Promote Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion and Localization v1 Customer-facing Surfaces as the next near-term candidates.
- Keep Commercial Entitlements / Billing-State, Cross-Tenant Compare / Promotion Execution, Governance Artifact Lifecycle, External Support Desk / PSA Handoff, and Private AI Execution Governance as distinct follow-ups.
- Add or refresh the recommended next-spec order.

## Phase 4: Roadmap Reconciliation

Update `docs/product/roadmap.md` to reflect current repo truth and remaining gaps.

Required outcomes:

- Current state clearly includes Spec 307 proof/run links, Spec 308 customer-safe summary/review-pack inclusion, and Spec 309 RBAC hardening.
- Roadmap sequence prioritizes:
  1. Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion
  2. Localization v1 Customer-facing Surfaces
  3. Decision-Based Governance Inbox v1
  4. Commercial Entitlements / Billing-State Maturity
  5. Cross-Tenant Compare & Promotion Execution
  6. Governance Artifact Lifecycle & Retention
  7. External Support Desk / PSA Handoff
  8. Private AI Execution Governance Foundation
- RBAC audit is completed hardening, not an active blocker, while Support Access Governance remains separate.
- Customer Review Workspace is not claimed fully complete unless repo evidence proves complete self-serve consumption.

## Phase 5: Supporting Docs Check

- Check `README.md` only for stale active-spec or path statements; do not turn it into roadmap.
- Check `AGENTS.md` only for instructions that contradict repo reality; avoid broad rewrites.
- Prefer no constitution changes. Change `.specify/memory/constitution.md` only if it directly contradicts repo truth and the product decision is clear.
- If `docs/product/product-vision.md` exists by implementation time, check it for concrete drift and edit minimally.

## Phase 6: Validation and Close-Out

Required commands:

```bash
git status --short --branch
git diff --stat
git diff --name-only
git diff --check
git diff --name-only | grep -vE '^(docs/|specs/|README\.md|AGENTS\.md|constitution\.md|\.specify/)' || true
```

Required close-out in this plan or a Spec 310 close-out section:

- changed files
- drift categories fixed
- completed/historical candidates
- still-open gaps
- deferred decisions
- next recommended specs
- no runtime changes
- no tests required because docs-only

## Implementation Close-Out

### Changed Files

- `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`
- `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`
- `docs/product/roadmap.md`
- `specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/spec.md`
- `specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/plan.md`
- `specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/tasks.md`
- `specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/checklists/requirements.md`

### Drift Categories Fixed

- `stale`: Spec 308 customer-safe Decision Summary / Review Pack inclusion is no longer described as pending in product-truth docs.
- `status wrong`: Spec 309 RBAC role matrix / access boundary hardening is now positioned as completed scoped security hardening.
- `too optimistic`: Customer Review Workspace is repo-real, but v1 completion remains an open gap instead of being treated as fully sellable.
- `too conservative`: Decision Register proof/run links and customer-safe summary/review-pack inclusion are now acknowledged as repo-real where evidence supports them.
- `priority wrong`: Roadmap and candidate queue now list the post-310 priority sequence.
- `historical / completed`: Specs 307, 308, and 309 are marked as promoted/completed context, not active next work.
- `superseded`: Broad Decision Register v1 / approval-workflow Greenfield language is closed in favor of the existing operator register plus narrower follow-ups.

### Completed / Historical Candidates

- Spec 307 `decision-register-evidence-operationrun-link-polish`: repo-real Decision Register proof/run link polish.
- Spec 308 `decision-register-summary-review-pack`: repo-real customer-safe Decision Summary and Review Pack inclusion.
- Spec 309 `rbac-role-matrix-access-boundary-audit`: scoped `security-hardening completed` for owner-only membership boundaries and admin/system panel access boundaries.

### Still-Open Gaps

- Customer Review Workspace v1 Completion.
- Localization v1 Customer-facing Surfaces.
- Decision-Based Governance Inbox v1.
- Commercial Entitlements / Billing-State Maturity.
- Cross-Tenant Compare / Promotion Execution if current spec-backed execution work still lacks runtime/product proof.
- Governance Artifact Lifecycle & Retention.
- External Support Desk / PSA Handoff productization.
- Support Access Governance, separate from Spec 309 hardening.
- Private AI Execution Governance runtime consumer.

### Supporting Docs

- `README.md`: checked; no concrete Spec 310 drift found.
- `AGENTS.md`: checked; no concrete Spec 310 drift found.
- `.specify/memory/constitution.md`: checked; no change needed because Spec 309 aligned runtime to existing owner-only membership semantics.
- `docs/product/product-vision.md`: absent in this repo state.
- Completed specs 307, 308, and 309 were not rewritten as active requirements.

### Validation Results

- `git status --short --branch`: showed only tracked product-doc changes plus the new `specs/310-product-truth-docs-drift-reconciliation/` docs package.
- `git diff --stat`: product-doc tracked diff only, 116 insertions and 64 deletions.
- `git diff --name-only`: `docs/product/implementation-ledger.md`, `docs/product/roadmap.md`, `docs/product/spec-candidates.md`.
- `git diff --name-only | grep -vE '^(docs/|specs/|README\.md|AGENTS\.md|constitution\.md|\.specify/)' || true`: no output.
- `git status --short | awk '{print $2}' | grep -vE '^(docs/|specs/|README\.md|AGENTS\.md|constitution\.md|\.specify/)' || true`: no output, including untracked Spec 310 files.
- `git diff --check`: passed after close-out.
- Untracked Spec 310 markdown whitespace check using `git diff --check --no-index /dev/null <file>` for each untracked Spec 310 file: no output.
- Stale-claim search after product-doc edits found no active product-doc claim that Spec 308 customer-safe summary/review-pack inclusion remains pending. Remaining matches are intentional Spec 310 inventory/search-task text, historical completed-spec context, or anti-reopen guardrails.
- No Pest/PHP tests were required or run because this is docs-only and no runtime files changed.

### Next Recommended Specs

1. `311-customer-review-workspace-v1-completion`
2. `312-localization-v1-customer-facing-surfaces`
3. `313-decision-based-governance-inbox-v1`
4. `314-commercial-entitlements-billing-state-maturity`
5. `315-cross-tenant-compare-promotion-execution`
6. `316-governance-artifact-lifecycle-retention`
7. `317-external-support-desk-psa-handoff`
8. `318-private-ai-execution-governance-foundation`

## Spec Readiness Gate

- `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, and `checklists/requirements.md` exist.
- Scope is documentation-only and explicitly forbids runtime paths.
- Drift inventory format and target documents are defined.
- Ledger, candidate queue, roadmap, supporting-doc, and validation phases are defined.
- RBAC, workspace/tenant isolation, OperationRun semantics, auditability, and Filament implications are N/A for runtime and are covered as documentation truth only.
- No open question blocks implementation.