ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
platform-dev
TenantAtlas/specs/319-environment-owned-surface-routing-shell-context-contract/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido edc33a5a17 spec: add environment-owned surface routing contract (#377) 
## Summary\n- add completed Spec 319 artifacts for the environment-owned Baseline Compare routing contract\n- include browser-smoke screenshots and focused validation notes\n- keep the PR diff limited to Spec 319 artifacts because runtime is already present in platform-dev via #374\n\n## Testing\n- git diff --check\n- focused validation recorded in specs/319-environment-owned-surface-routing-shell-context-contract/tasks.md

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #377
2026-05-16 22:55:57 +00:00

4.0 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Environment-Owned Surface Routing & Shell Context Contract

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation Created: 2026-05-16 Feature: spec.md

Candidate Selection Gate

  • Explicit user-provided Spec 319 request was selected as the source of truth for this preparation pass.
  • Completed-spec guardrail checked that no existing specs/319-* package was present before generation.
  • Specs 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, and 318 were treated as dependency/historical context, not rewritten.
  • Roadmap/spec-candidate queue was reviewed; active auto-prep queue is empty, so this package proceeds only because the user directly supplied/promoted Spec 319.
  • Close alternatives were deferred to follow-up specs 320, 321, and 322.
  • The selected slice is Baseline Compare Environment-owned route/shell hardening only.

Content Quality

  • Problem statement is operator-visible and tied to route/shell/copy mismatch.
  • User value is clear: self-sufficient Environment-owned Baseline Compare with no hidden fallback.
  • Scope is bounded to Baseline Compare, with related pages inspect-only.
  • Hard cutover/no compatibility posture is explicit.
  • No unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
  • Mandatory Spec Candidate Check is complete.
  • Spec Scope Fields are complete.
  • Shared pattern, OperationRun, provider boundary, UI/surface, testing, acceptance, and browser sections are complete.

Requirement Completeness

  • Functional requirements are testable and unambiguous.
  • Requirements cover canonical Environment route, old route rejection, cross-workspace protection, CTA URL generation, shell/copy, reload, back/forward, and Decision Register regression.
  • Non-goals prevent Spec 320/321/322 scope creep.
  • Edge cases are identified.
  • Assumptions and risks are documented.
  • Success criteria are measurable.
  • Open questions do not block implementation.

Plan Quality

  • Laravel, Filament, Livewire, Pest, PostgreSQL, Sail, and Dokploy context is recorded.
  • Livewire v4.0+ compliance is explicitly noted through Livewire 4.1.4.
  • Laravel 12 panel provider location remains apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php.
  • Global search impact is assessed as unchanged unless a Resource is touched.
  • Destructive/high-impact action handling is addressed for existing Compare Now.
  • Asset strategy is assessed as no new Filament assets/no new filament:assets step.
  • No migration, seeder, package, env var, queue, scheduler, storage, or deployment asset change is planned.
  • Existing repo seams are named.
  • Test strategy and browser verification plan are concrete.

Task Quality

  • Tasks are ordered from guardrails/tests through runtime changes, browser verification, and final validation.
  • Tests are required before or alongside implementation.
  • Task IDs follow the required checkbox format.
  • File paths are concrete where repo surfaces are known.
  • Non-tasks explicitly prevent compatibility layers, query alias support, and follow-up-spec scope creep.
  • Browser screenshot paths are specified.
  • Validation commands are specified.

Constitution Alignment

  • Workspace and Environment isolation are covered.
  • Cross-workspace Environment access is 404/safe no-access.
  • No new persisted truth is introduced.
  • No new abstraction/framework/taxonomy is planned.
  • OperationRun semantics are preserved for existing Compare Now behavior.
  • Audit/authorization/confirmation expectations for high-impact action remain explicit.
  • Test governance lane impact is explicit.
  • Provider/platform boundary is explicit.

Readiness Result

  • Candidate Selection Gate passes.
  • Spec Readiness Gate passes.
  • Ready for separate implementation loop.
  • No application implementation was performed during this preparation step.