TenantAtlas/specs/323-tenantial-enterprise-ui-audit-foundation/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Tenantial Enterprise UI Audit Foundation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness, preparation quality, and readiness before implementation. Created: 2026-05-17 Feature: specs/323-tenantial-enterprise-ui-audit-foundation/spec.md

Candidate Selection Gate

• Explicit user-provided Spec 323 request was selected as the source of truth for this preparation pass.
• The additional user requirement that 323 becomes an ongoing Design Coverage Gate baseline is included.
• Completed-spec guardrail checked that no existing specs/323-* package or 323-* branch was present before generation.
• Specs 318, 319, 320, 321, and 322 were treated as dependency/historical context and not rewritten.
• Roadmap/spec-candidate queue was reviewed; active auto-prep queue is empty, so this package proceeds only because the user directly supplied/promoted Spec 323.
• Close alternatives were deferred to Specs 324, 325, 326, and 327.
• The selected slice is docs-first UI audit foundation plus ongoing registry gate only.

Content Quality

• Problem statement is product-visible and tied to route/page design-coverage debt.
• User value is clear: every reachable page receives a design decision or an explicit unresolved/internal/deprecated marker.
• Scope is bounded to audit docs, screenshots, page reports, matrix, follow-up grouping, registry gate, Spec Kit process templates/prompts, PR template, and PR guard script.
• No runtime redesign or application implementation is included in preparation artifacts.
• No migration, seeder, package, env var, queue, scheduler, storage, route, auth, runtime deployment, or deployment asset change is planned.
• No unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
• Mandatory Spec Candidate Check is complete.
• Spec includes explicit non-goals and stop conditions.

Requirement Completeness

• Functional requirements are testable and unambiguous.
• Requirements cover audit structure, route inventory, screenshots, page reports, coverage matrix, strategic surfaces, grouped follow-ups, unresolved pages, dangerous actions, customer-safe review, context ambiguity, misleading status, ongoing gate, Constitution principle, Spec Kit templates, implementation prompts, PR template, and PR guard script.
• Non-functional requirements cover repo truth, Markdown stability, screenshot naming, bounded responsive review, no runtime frameworking, and validation.
• Success criteria are measurable by artifact existence, counts, links, and validation result.
• User stories include independent test descriptions and acceptance scenarios.
• Edge cases cover auth blocks, seeded-data needs, provider connection needs, redirect loops, runtime errors, hidden routes, legacy ambiguity, and screenshot blockers.
• Dependencies and assumptions are identified.

Plan Quality

• Laravel, Filament, Livewire, Pest, PostgreSQL, Sail, and docs/browser-audit context is recorded.
• Livewire v4.0+ compliance is explicitly noted through Livewire 4.1.4.
• Laravel 12 panel provider location remains apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php.
• Global search impact is assessed as unchanged because no Resource code changes are planned.
• Destructive/high-impact action handling is audit-only and does not change action behavior.
• Asset strategy is assessed as no new Filament assets/no new filament:assets step.
• Existing repo seams and discovery paths are named.
• Browser audit/screenshot plan is concrete and bounded.
• Test governance classifies the change as Markdown/browser-audit only.

Task Quality

• Tasks are ordered from guardrails through structure, discovery, browser screenshots, reports, matrix, gate documentation, and validation.
• Task IDs follow the required checkbox format.
• File paths are concrete where repo surfaces and audit artifacts are known.
• Tasks include explicit route discovery and file-based discovery steps.
• Tasks include the ongoing Design Coverage Gate, later UI spec DoD, Spec Kit template updates, agent prompt guardrail, PR template checkbox, and CI/review guard.
• Tasks include validation and final reporting obligations.
• Non-goals and stop conditions prevent runtime implementation.

Constitution / Repo Alignment

• Workspace/environment/tenant context is audited but not changed.
• RBAC, dangerous actions, and customer-safe exposure are reviewed but not changed.
• Proportionality review covers docs-only classification ownership cost.
• No runtime taxonomy, enum, persisted entity, or UI framework is introduced.
• Test governance names no-runtime-impact, UI/Productization Coverage guard validation, and no full-suite requirement.
• Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is explicitly addressed.
• Provider-boundary terminology is flagged as audit concern only, not changed.

Preparation Analysis Outcome

• Preparation artifacts are internally consistent after manual /speckit.analyze-style review.
• Every functional requirement maps to one or more tasks.
• Every task maps to Spec 323 audit scope or stop-condition enforcement.
• No preparation issue requires application implementation.
• Candidate Selection Gate result: PASS.
• Spec Readiness Gate result: PASS for later docs/browser-audit implementation.

Notes

• Repository has prompt/agent definitions for speckit.tasks and speckit.analyze, but no local executable Bash command for those phases. Tasks and analysis were therefore produced repo-conformantly from the templates and checked manually in this checklist.
• Full suite is intentionally not part of preparation or later Markdown-only validation unless runtime changes are introduced, which would violate this spec's scope.