## Summary - add the Spec 340 browser verification gate package for the post-338/339 workspace and environment scope contract - add a bounded Pest browser smoke that verifies clean workspace origin, environment origin, explicit `environment_id` hub filtering, remembered-environment non-authority, and Provider Connections create/view/edit authority signals - record the verification inventory, matrix, findings, checklist, and audit report under `specs/340-post-scope-contract-browser-verification-gate/` - document a `GO` recommendation with no confirmed P1/P2 drift and one backlog wording follow-up - keep the change verification-only with no runtime behavior, schema, or route-family changes ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Browser/Spec340PostScopeContractVerificationSmokeTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/ProviderConnections --filter=ScopeHardening` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `git diff --check --no-index /dev/null apps/platform/tests/Browser/Spec340PostScopeContractVerificationSmokeTest.php` - `git diff --check` ## Notes - Livewire v4 compliance unchanged - Filament provider registration remains in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - no globally searchable resource behavior changed - no destructive action behavior changed or executed in this verification gate - no new Filament assets; deploy `filament:assets` posture is unchanged Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #411
54 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
54 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 340 - Post-Scope Contract Browser Verification Gate
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate Spec 340 preparation completeness before implementation.
|
|
**Created**: 2026-05-31
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/340-post-scope-contract-browser-verification-gate/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection Gate
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK001 The selected candidate is directly provided by the user as Spec 340.
|
|
- [x] CHK002 Related existing specs were checked for completed-spec signals and are treated as context only.
|
|
- [x] CHK003 The package does not overwrite an existing `specs/340-*` directory.
|
|
- [x] CHK004 Close alternatives are deferred instead of hidden inside the primary scope.
|
|
- [x] CHK005 The candidate is narrowed to a browser/IA verification gate, not a new product feature.
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK006 The spec has a concrete problem statement, user value, and primary operator/reviewer audience.
|
|
- [x] CHK007 The spec includes functional requirements, non-functional requirements, out-of-scope boundaries, assumptions, risks, and open questions.
|
|
- [x] CHK008 The spec avoids premature implementation details except where repo truth is needed for correctness.
|
|
- [x] CHK009 No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]`, placeholder, or unresolved template marker remains.
|
|
- [x] CHK010 Acceptance criteria and success criteria are measurable enough for later implementation review.
|
|
|
|
## Constitution And Scope
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK011 The Spec Candidate Check is filled and scores above the approval threshold.
|
|
- [x] CHK012 The proportionality review states no new persisted truth, abstraction, runtime status family, or UI framework.
|
|
- [x] CHK013 Workspace/environment isolation, RBAC, Provider Connection authority, and audit/report evidence concerns are addressed.
|
|
- [x] CHK014 UI/Productization Coverage is handled as verification-only no-impact, with an explicit rule for updating artifacts before any runtime UI fix.
|
|
- [x] CHK015 Test governance identifies browser as the primary lane and keeps fixture/browser cost explicit.
|
|
|
|
## Plan Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK016 `plan.md` identifies the likely repo surfaces to inspect without requiring runtime code changes.
|
|
- [x] CHK017 The plan distinguishes verification artifacts from optional runtime/test changes.
|
|
- [x] CHK018 The plan records Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture, provider registration no-change, global search no-change, destructive-action no-execution, and asset no-change.
|
|
- [x] CHK019 Deployment/ops impact is explicitly none unless a later bounded runtime fix changes code.
|
|
- [x] CHK020 Implementation phases are ordered from preflight to discovery, browser verification, findings, optional automation, and close-out.
|
|
|
|
## Task Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK021 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered into small verification-first phases.
|
|
- [x] CHK022 Tasks include concrete file paths for artifacts and likely code surfaces.
|
|
- [x] CHK023 Tasks include browser setup, data availability, blocked-check handling, topbar semantics, Provider Connection authority, and go/no-go reporting.
|
|
- [x] CHK024 Tasks include validation commands and prevent destructive/external-provider action execution.
|
|
- [x] CHK025 Tasks explicitly forbid completed-spec rewrites and unrelated application implementation.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Readiness Gate
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK026 `spec.md`, `plan.md`, and `tasks.md` exist.
|
|
- [x] CHK027 No open question blocks safe implementation.
|
|
- [x] CHK028 The scope is small enough for a bounded implementation loop.
|
|
- [x] CHK029 Required checklist artifact exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK030 Result: ready for implementation loop as a verification-only package.
|