ahmido
12ea7f9924
Implemented the output contract and readiness semantics for review packs. Also added spec 348. Includes changes to ChooseEnvironment, CustomerReviewWorkspace, GenerateReviewPackJob and related blade views. Added comprehensive tests. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #419
69 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Checklist: Spec 347 - Review Pack Output Contract & Readiness Semantics
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Preparation analysis for Spec 347 readiness
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-02
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/347-review-pack-output-contract-readiness-semantics/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection And Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided Spec 347 draft plus roadmap/spec-candidate alignment.
|
|
- [x] CHK002 No `specs/347-*` package existed before this prep.
|
|
- [x] CHK003 Related completed specs are treated as historical context only: 109, 308, 312, 337, 342, 343, and 344.
|
|
- [x] CHK004 Active Spec 346 is treated as adjacent context only and is not rewritten or normalized by this prep.
|
|
- [x] CHK005 The selected slice is narrow and reviewable: output contract, readiness semantics, workspace wording, tests, and disclosure only.
|
|
|
|
## Required Prep Artifacts
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK006 `spec.md` exists and contains no placeholder template sections.
|
|
- [x] CHK007 `plan.md` exists and is repo-aware.
|
|
- [x] CHK008 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
|
|
- [x] CHK009 `repo-truth-map.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK010 `contracts/review-pack-output-contract.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK011 `contracts/readiness-semantics.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK012 `contracts/customer-safe-output-boundary.md` exists.
|
|
- [x] CHK013 This checklist exists.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK014 Spec Candidate Check is completed.
|
|
- [x] CHK015 The spec distinguishes repo truth from the user draft, including the current `sections/` file layout and the existing `auditor_ready_executive_export.v1` contract.
|
|
- [x] CHK016 The spec states clear goals, non-goals, requirements, risks, assumptions, and acceptance criteria.
|
|
- [x] CHK017 The spec keeps readiness semantics derived-only and forbids new persisted readiness truth by default.
|
|
- [x] CHK018 The spec includes a proportionality review for the possible bounded readiness mapper.
|
|
|
|
## Plan / Task Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK019 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change.
|
|
- [x] CHK020 The plan explicitly preserves signed-download safety.
|
|
- [x] CHK021 The plan explicitly keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider registration location visible.
|
|
- [x] CHK022 The task list includes tests-first work and explicit runtime validation commands.
|
|
- [x] CHK023 The task list keeps scope bounded and includes non-goal guardrails against portal/rewrite/persistence creep.
|
|
|
|
## UI / Productization Coverage
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK024 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim no-impact.
|
|
- [x] CHK025 UI/Productization Coverage is completed for the existing strategic customer-safe workspace surface.
|
|
- [x] CHK026 The plan and spec point to the existing UI audit page report `ui-006-customer-review-workspace.md` instead of inventing a new identity.
|
|
- [x] CHK027 Audience-aware disclosure and no-false-ready/certification boundaries are explicit.
|
|
|
|
## Test Governance
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK028 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Feature plus one bounded Browser smoke.
|
|
- [x] CHK029 New test file paths are specified.
|
|
- [x] CHK030 Existing Review Pack and Customer Review Workspace regression commands are included.
|
|
- [x] CHK031 No broad new heavy-governance family is introduced.
|
|
|
|
## Readiness Gate Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK032 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK033 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK034 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
|
|
- [x] CHK035 Recommended next step is implementation, not additional prep.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
|
|
- [x] Workflow outcome: keep
|
|
- [x] Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`
|
|
- [x] Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based artifact review checklist; no standalone local `speckit.analyze` command was available in this repo surface
|