TenantAtlas/specs/350-operator-resolution-guidance-framework-v1/repo-truth-map.md
ahmido 4cf2712f92 feat: operator resolution guidance framework v1 (spec 350) (#421)
Implemented the first version of the operator resolution guidance framework. Added new foundation classes (ResolutionCase, ResolutionAction) and a ReviewPackOutputResolutionAdapter. Updated the Customer Review Workspace and Environment Review Resource to use the new adapter. Added extensive test coverage for the framework and UI integrations.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #421
2026-06-03 15:35:25 +00:00

6.1 KiB

Spec 350 - Repo Truth Map

Created: 2026-06-03
Scope: Operator Resolution Guidance Framework v1

This map records the repo-backed truth that Spec 350 is allowed to standardize. It exists to stop the implementation from inventing a workflow engine or a second explanation subsystem.

Existing Guidance Producers

Area Repo evidence Current repo-real truth Current gap Spec 350 handling
Review output guidance apps/platform/app/Support/ReviewPacks/ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance.php Derived review/output guidance already exists with state, reason, impact, one primary action, secondary actions, technical details, and evidence-basis semantics local to review-output path; no shared source/scope/action envelope required adapter; wrap, do not replace
Customer-safe review consumer apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Reviews/CustomerReviewWorkspace.php first-screen review output uses existing output guidance plus repo-real findings and accepted-risk follow-up overrides page-local contract and helper structure first required visible consumer; preserve overrides
Review detail consumer apps/platform/app/Filament/Resources/EnvironmentReviewResource.php detail surface already exposes output guidance and qualified download wording, and customer-workspace detail mode suppresses repeated action rails not yet expressed as a shared case contract second required visible consumer; preserve detail-mode suppression
Operation follow-up apps/platform/app/Support/OpsUx/OperationUxPresenter.php dominant follow-up text already exists for runs mostly text-only; no explicit case/action/source envelope optional bounded adapter only if an in-scope consumer needs it
Shared explanation apps/platform/app/Support/Ui/OperatorExplanation/OperatorExplanationPattern.php operator explanation already separates trust/reliability/next action for some domains not a cross-domain resolution-case envelope reuse as semantic input
Shared next-step shape apps/platform/app/Support/Ui/EnterpriseDetail/EnterpriseDetailSectionFactory.php primaryNextStep() already models main text + secondary guidance local to enterprise-detail surfaces reuse as action-shape prior art
Governance Inbox apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/Governance/GovernanceInbox.php page already shows Next recommended action over lane-specific items queue-specific, not reusable across other domains optional bounded consumer
Provider readiness apps/platform/app/Support/Providers/TargetScope/ProviderConnectionSurfaceSummary.php readiness summary already exists for provider connections no shared action-safe case envelope optional adapter input only
Required permissions guidance apps/platform/app/Filament/Pages/EnvironmentRequiredPermissions.php page already exposes guidance, verification link, and provider-management link local guidance page, not shared case contract optional bounded consumer
Environment dashboard recommendations apps/platform/app/Support/EnvironmentDashboard/EnvironmentDashboardSummaryBuilder.php readiness and recommended-action summaries already exist dashboard-local action model optional bounded consumer

Existing Shared Contracts To Reuse

Contract / helper What it already solves Spec 350 rule
ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance issue + reason + impact + one action for review output do not re-derive raw output truth
OperationUxPresenter::surfaceGuidance() dominant follow-up text for run states do not replace run lifecycle or toasts/notifications
OperatorExplanationPattern trust/reliability/next-action semantics use as semantic input, not duplicate terminology
EnterpriseDetailSectionFactory::primaryNextStep() existing primary-next-step structure align action naming and supporting guidance
OperationRunLinks and existing scoped URL helpers safe deep-linking reuse for all action destinations

Verified Scope Constraints

  • No new persistence is justified by current repo truth.
  • No new route family is justified.
  • No new workflow engine is justified.
  • No hidden shell/sidebar/topbar scope is allowed.
  • Provider-specific language must remain bounded to provider-owned adapters and surfaces.
  • Any executable action must defer to existing capability, confirmation, audit, and OperationRun paths.

Known Overlap / Drift Risks

  1. ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance already looks like a case contract for one domain; Spec 350 must wrap it, not supersede it.
  2. CustomerReviewWorkspace already overrides review-output guidance for findings and accepted-risk follow-up; Spec 350 must preserve those repo-real exceptions instead of flattening them away.
  3. EnvironmentReviewResource already suppresses repeated action rails in customer-workspace detail mode; Spec 350 must preserve that behavior.
  4. OperatorExplanationPattern already exists for another domain family; Spec 350 must not become a competing explanation framework.
  5. Governance Inbox and environment dashboard already have local next-action logic; if integrating them would require a bigger taxonomy rewrite, they stay out of scope.
  6. A standalone evidence-basis adapter is not justified in v1 because the review-output path already carries evidence-basis truth through ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance.
  7. Spec 347 contains a speculative follow-up note using number 350; this is commentary only and not a real package reservation.

Narrowest Correct Implementation Boundary

The current repo truth supports:

  • one shared derived case/action envelope
  • one required review-output adapter over existing guidance producers
  • two required visible consumers on the review-output path
  • optional provider-readiness or operation-follow-up adapters only when a concrete same-slice consumer keeps the reuse cost low
  • optional additional consumers only when the reuse cost stays low

The current repo truth does not support:

  • a generic workflow engine
  • a new provider-neutral execution framework
  • a new persisted resolution queue
  • a mandatory standalone evidence-basis adapter in v1
  • a broad dashboard or governance surface redesign hidden inside this spec