TenantAtlas/specs/354-finding-exceptions-accepted-risk-resolution-guidance-v1/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido a9c54205bf feat: finding exceptions accepted risk resolution guidance v1 (spec 354) (#425)
Implemented the accepted risk resolution guidance, including the AcceptedRiskResolutionAdapter, guidance cards, and updated related Filament views. Added unit, feature, and browser tests.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #425
2026-06-05 02:20:46 +00:00

2.3 KiB

Requirements Checklist: Spec 354 - Finding Exceptions / Accepted Risk Resolution Guidance v1

Purpose: Validate preparation readiness only. This checklist does not certify implementation, runtime tests, or browser proof.

Candidate And Guardrail

  • CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user draft plus repo-real accepted-risk follow-up materials.
  • CHK002 No completed spec package is being reopened or normalized back to preparation state.
  • CHK003 The selected slice is narrower than a broad governance-workbench, portal, or GRC rebuild and fits the post-Spec-353 follow-through need.

Repo Truth Alignment

  • CHK004 The prep records the exact current accepted-risk owner surfaces instead of inventing new queue/detail pages.
  • CHK005 Existing FindingRiskGovernanceResolver truth is named explicitly as the primary guidance source.
  • CHK006 Existing customer-safe accepted-risk wording in downstream review-output surfaces is treated as continuity context, not a new owner surface.
  • CHK007 Existing queue audit coverage (ui-012) is carried forward as the strategic productization proof source.

Constitution And Scope

  • CHK008 The spec forbids new persistence, a new workflow engine, a new review-impact framework, and a broader portal/workbench rewrite.
  • CHK009 Provider/platform boundary handling is explicit and keeps this slice platform-core and governance-owned.
  • CHK010 Existing capability, audit, and OperationRun ownership remain explicit.
  • CHK011 UI/Productization coverage is explicit for queue and detail surfaces.

Test Governance And Readiness

  • CHK012 Unit, Feature/Livewire, and Browser coverage are named in the narrowest honest mix.
  • CHK013 The plan names concrete runtime seams and likely touched files instead of relying on vague architecture intent.
  • CHK014 The tasks are ordered, verifiable, and scoped to this slice only.
  • CHK015 No open question blocks a bounded implementation loop.

Review Outcome

  • Ready for implementation prep handoff.
  • Main caveat recorded: any stale-governance case based on finding-change timestamps is conditional and must be omitted if repo proof is weak.
  • This checklist validates preparation only. No application implementation, runtime test execution, or browser smoke has been performed in this prep step.