ahmido
548a37c888
Implemented sync capture backup operation semantics as requested. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #433
66 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Checklist: Spec 362 - Sync, Capture, and Backup Operation Semantics
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Preparation analysis for Spec 362 readiness
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-07
|
|
**Feature**: `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/wt-plattform/specs/362-sync-capture-backup-operation-semantics/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection And Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: the direct user-provided Spec 362 draft from `/Users/ahmeddarrazi/.codex/attachments/c6e1919f-3e04-4f47-b6a8-58c0fdc2ab82/pasted-text.txt`.
|
|
- [x] CHK002 No `specs/362-*` package existed before Spec Kit branch creation.
|
|
- [x] CHK003 The active candidate queue's empty-state note is respected; this package is an intentional manual promotion, not an auto-selected queue item.
|
|
- [x] CHK004 Related specs were checked and treated correctly: Specs 358, 359, and 361 are implementation context, and Spec 360 remains canonical-cutover context only.
|
|
- [x] CHK005 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in `spec.md`, especially the narrowed safe scope around `inventory.sync`, `baseline.capture`, and `backup.schedule.execute` plus the explicit defer/fail-closed treatment for `policy.sync` and `backup_set.update`.
|
|
|
|
## Required Prep Artifacts
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK006 `spec.md` exists and contains no template placeholders.
|
|
- [x] CHK007 `plan.md` exists and is repo-aware.
|
|
- [x] CHK008 `tasks.md` exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
|
|
- [x] CHK009 This checklist exists.
|
|
|
|
## Spec Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK010 Spec Candidate Check is completed and scores above the approval threshold.
|
|
- [x] CHK011 The spec keeps `OperationRun`, `InventoryItem`, `BaselineSnapshot`, `BackupSet`, and `BackupItem` persistence unchanged.
|
|
- [x] CHK012 The spec explains why bounded adapter extension is justified now under ABSTR-001: the repo already has real registry-backed reconciliation consumers and current proof seams for the selected families.
|
|
- [x] CHK013 The spec keeps scope bounded to inventory-sync reconciliation, baseline-capture reconciliation, backup-schedule reconciliation, and honest unsupported-family handling.
|
|
- [x] CHK014 The proportionality review rejects a generic sync/backup engine, new operation types, new persistence, and weak "latest artifact exists" heuristics.
|
|
|
|
## Plan / Task Alignment
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK015 The plan identifies the actual repo surfaces likely to change, including the current registry, write seam, proof models, proof presenters, and operations/detail pages.
|
|
- [x] CHK016 The plan keeps Filament v5 / Livewire v4 posture and provider-registration location visible.
|
|
- [x] CHK017 The plan explicitly states that no migration, no new panel/provider, no new global search change, and no new asset strategy are expected.
|
|
- [x] CHK018 The tasks start with repo truth and failing tests before runtime edits.
|
|
- [x] CHK019 The tasks include explicit anti-creep guardrails against new persistence, new queue families, generic sync/backup heuristics, and unsupported-family widening.
|
|
- [x] CHK020 The tasks keep the current `OperationRun` lifecycle owner, current presenter/link surfaces, and current workspace-first RBAC model authoritative.
|
|
|
|
## UI / Monitoring / Proof Coverage
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK021 UI Surface Impact is completed and does not claim a new page family.
|
|
- [x] CHK022 The changed surfaces are correctly classified as existing operations monitoring/detail plus existing inventory, baseline, and backup detail follow-through, not a new strategic customer-facing page.
|
|
- [x] CHK023 No new page-report identity or route-inventory expansion is required unless implementation proves a materially new visible hierarchy.
|
|
- [x] CHK024 Audience-aware disclosure and no-overclaim wording boundaries are explicit for operations, run detail, and current proof/detail surfaces.
|
|
|
|
## Test Governance
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK025 The declared test families are the narrowest honest proof: Unit + Feature + one bounded Browser smoke.
|
|
- [x] CHK026 No heavy-governance family or PGSQL-only schema lane is introduced by default.
|
|
- [x] CHK027 Planned validation commands are explicit, partitioned into the primary Spec 362 gate and bounded contextual regressions, and remain scoped to selected-family fallout only.
|
|
|
|
## Readiness Gate Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK028 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK029 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
|
|
- [x] CHK030 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
|
|
- [x] CHK031 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK032 Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
|
|
- [x] CHK033 Workflow outcome: keep
|
|
- [x] CHK034 Final note location: active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`
|
|
- [x] CHK035 Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based cross-artifact review; no standalone local `speckit.analyze` command was exposed in this repo surface beyond prompts and agent instructions
|
|
- [x] CHK036 Tooling note: Spec Kit branch/spec creation succeeded via `create-new-feature.sh`, `setup-plan.sh` generated the plan file, and `tasks.md` plus this checklist were authored manually to match the repo's Spec Kit templates and agent instructions
|