TenantAtlas/specs/364-restore-high-risk-operation-reconciliation/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 364 - Restore and High-Risk Operation Reconciliation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation Created: 2026-06-07 Feature: specs/364-restore-high-risk-operation-reconciliation/spec.md

Candidate Selection Gate

• CHK001 The candidate source is explicit: direct user-provided Spec 364 draft from /Users/ahmeddarrazi/.codex/attachments/fe416f8b-141a-44eb-ae89-ab62a4691bed/pasted-text.txt.
• CHK002 No specs/364-* package existed before SpecKit branch creation.
• CHK003 No local or remote 364-* branch was detected before SpecKit branch creation.
• CHK004 The active candidate queue's empty-state note is respected; this package is an intentional manual promotion, not an auto-selected backlog item.
• CHK005 Related completed specs are treated as context only: Specs 333, 335, and 358-363 are not rewritten, unchecked, normalized, or reopened.
• CHK006 Repo-truth deviations from the user draft are recorded in spec.md, especially no new verification_required OperationRun outcome and no new restore.verify operation type.
• CHK007 Close alternatives are deferred explicitly instead of hidden inside Spec 364.

Artifact Completeness

• CHK008 spec.md exists and contains no template placeholders.
• CHK009 plan.md exists and is repo-aware.
• CHK010 tasks.md exists and is ordered, small, and verifiable.
• CHK011 This checklist exists.
• CHK012 No application implementation is included in the preparation artifacts.

Spec Quality

• CHK013 Spec Candidate Check is completed and scored above the approval threshold.
• CHK014 Problem, today's failure, user-visible improvement, smallest version, non-goals, complexity, why-now, and why-not-local are explicit.
• CHK015 User stories are prioritized and independently testable.
• CHK016 Functional requirements are testable and unambiguous.
• CHK017 Success criteria are measurable.
• CHK018 Edge cases, assumptions, risks, and follow-up candidates are documented.
• CHK019 No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

Constitution Alignment

• CHK020 The spec keeps OperationRun, RestoreRun, and audit persistence unchanged.
• CHK021 The spec forbids a new OperationRunOutcome, OperationRunStatus, restore operation type, restore verification table, Graph contract, or high-risk framework.
• CHK022 The proportionality review explains why restore-specific proof hardening is justified now.
• CHK023 The plan keeps Graph calls out of reconciliation and render paths.
• CHK024 The plan preserves service-owned OperationRun lifecycle writes.
• CHK025 RBAC, workspace isolation, managed-environment isolation, and deny-as-not-found boundaries are explicit.
• CHK026 Provider boundary classification is explicit and keeps Microsoft/Intune restore semantics provider-owned.
• CHK027 Audit metadata safety is explicit: no secrets, credentials, or raw provider payloads.

UI / Filament / Ops UX

• CHK028 UI Surface Impact is completed and classifies existing Operations and Restore surfaces.
• CHK029 UI/Productization Coverage explains why no new route/page family is expected.
• CHK030 OperationRun UX Impact is completed and reuses shared OperationRun start/completion/link behavior.
• CHK031 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance is explicit in the plan.
• CHK032 Laravel 12 Filament provider location remains apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php.
• CHK033 Global search impact is explicit: no resource global-search change expected.
• CHK034 Destructive/high-impact restore action handling is explicit: existing action path must retain ->action(...), ->requiresConfirmation(), server authorization, audit, and tests.
• CHK035 Asset strategy is explicit: no new assets expected; filament:assets only if future implementation unexpectedly registers assets.

Tasks Quality

• CHK036 Tasks start with repo truth and failing tests before runtime edits.
• CHK037 Tasks include Unit, Feature, optional Browser, validation, formatting, and close-out work.
• CHK038 Tasks include anti-creep guardrails against new outcomes, operation types, persistence, Graph contracts, and generic high-risk frameworking.
• CHK039 Tasks are small enough for a bounded later implementation loop.
• CHK040 Tasks include explicit validation commands.

Preparation Analyze Result

• CHK041 Cross-artifact terminology is consistent across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md: restore.execute, proof bundle, verification gap, OperationRun, RestoreRun, managed environment, and existing outcomes.
• CHK042 Requirements map to tasks: success proof, preview-only rejection, missing-proof handling, partial/blocked/failed mapping, wrong-scope safety, visible fallout, unsupported family guard, and validation are all covered.
• CHK043 Tasks do not require scope missing from the spec.
• CHK044 Plan surfaces do not contradict current repo architecture.
• CHK045 No open question blocks safe implementation.
• CHK046 Preparation analyze result: pass via repo-based cross-artifact review; no standalone local speckit.analyze generator command was exposed in this repo surface beyond prompts and agent instructions.
• CHK047 Tooling note: SpecKit branch/spec creation succeeded via create-new-feature.sh; setup-plan.sh generated plan.md; tasks.md and this checklist were authored manually to match repo templates and agent instructions.
• CHK048 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: the success proof bundle now has repo-real sources, missing-proof outcomes, and reason-code guidance.
• CHK049 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: not_reconciled is clarified as a non-final ReconciliationResult decision, not an OperationRun outcome.
• CHK050 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: tasks explicitly cover missing audit continuity and soft-deleted RestoreRun proof.
• CHK051 Follow-up analyze remediation is applied: Browser classification is conditional on visible hierarchy changes.

Gate Results

• CHK052 Candidate Selection Gate passes.
• CHK053 Spec Readiness Gate passes.
• CHK054 Runtime implementation has not started in this preparation step.
• CHK055 Recommended next step is implementation, not more prep.

Review Outcome

• Outcome class: acceptable-special-case.
• Workflow outcome: keep.
• Final note location for implementation PR: Guardrail / Exception / Smoke Coverage.